London-based vehicle data startup Cazana sets out to raise €1.15 million on Crowdcube for global expansion

London-based vehicle data company Cazana has opened up a part of their Series A funding round to their users and fans with a €1.15 million crowd-fundraise on Crowdcube.

Using big data and predictive analytics, Cazana provides automotive insights for vehicle owners and renters, analysing millions of automotive transactions daily to assess the value and risk associated with every vehicle on the road. Founded in 2013, Cazana is already used by manufacturers, finance companies, dealerships, and insurers across the globe.

The funding round is set to be led by Passion Capital, along with industry heavyweights David Hammond and Robert Diamond, along with existing Cazana customers and motoring enthusiasts also expected to take a stake.

The funding will support the global expansion of the business, and be used to develop Cazana’s growing suite of services, including the newly acquired Car & Classic website – the largest classic and specialist vehicle marketplace in Europe, with over 2 millio..

FlixBus, the German Uber-like bus service, is buying rival Eurolines from Transdev

While all eyes are on what Uber, Lyft and Didi will do this year as transportation-on-demand using private vehicles continues to consolidate, there’s also some interesting moves being played out in the adjacent business of bus and coach services. Today, FlixBus, the German startup backed by Daimler, General Atlantic, Silver Lake and others that has… Continue reading FlixBus, the German Uber-like bus service, is buying rival Eurolines from Transdev

Go-Jek pulls in $100M more for its massive Series F round

U.S. ride-hailing giants Lyft and Uber are going public in the U.S. imminently, but over in Southeast Asia, the two largest on-demand companies are still madly fueling up on investment capital. The latest update to that story today saw Go-Jek, the Indonesian ride-hailing firm aiming to go regional in Southeast Asia, announced that it has… Continue reading Go-Jek pulls in $100M more for its massive Series F round

CrimpIQ Cloud-Based Industrial Solution Saves Time and Money for Hydraulic and Industrial Hose Customers

European premiere: Smart crimper for hydraulic and industrial hose markets reduces costly downtime Coupling solution for digital age: CrimpCloud connectivity platform provides latest specifications and updates and enables remote maintenance Hanover, March 2019. Technology company Continental will be unveiling its smart crimper for hydraulic and industrial hoses, the CrimpIQ controller, to a European audience for… Continue reading CrimpIQ Cloud-Based Industrial Solution Saves Time and Money for Hydraulic and Industrial Hose Customers

Mercedes-Benz EQ Silver Arrow Formula E electric racing car debuts in special livery

Follow Bengt

Mercedes-Benz EQ Silver Arrow 01 concept
Mercedes-Benz is formally entering Formula E electric-car racing for the upcoming 2019-2020 season, and for the upcoming Geneva Motor Show it has revealed what it terms a “teaser” version of the racing car, called the EQ Silver Arrow 01.

Mercedes says that it “provides an idea of the team’s Formula E campaign to come.” The vehicle won’t be shown in its final livery, according to a release “at a later stage ahead of the season opener.”

DON’T MISS: 11 things you need to know about Formula E electric-car racing

“The blue touches and the subtle contrast between matte and gloss in conjunction with the star motif at the rear of the vehicle convey the concept of progressive luxury in electric motorsport,” said chief design officer Gordon Wagener of this version, in a company press release, with notes that the horizontal blue line symbolizes Mercedes’ electrification-focused EQ brand and is in contrast to the green hue of its Formula 1 car, the Mercedes-AMG F1 W10 EQ Power+.

“Formula E is going to be a completely new playing field for us,” said Toto Wolff, the head of Mercedes-Benz Motorsport. “But we are looking forward to the challenge of demonstrating the performance of our intelligent battery-electric drives in motorsport and of giving a positive boost to the EQ brand.”

CHECK OUT: Formula E signs on to complete battery recycling

Mercedes-Benz EQ Silver Arrow 01 concept

The upcoming 2019-2020 racing season will be the first one in which Mercedes will compete in both Formula 1 and Formula E.

Season 6 of Formula E, slated to start in December 2019, will also include Porsche for the first time. With the current Season 5, BMW entered as a manufacturer team, and Nissan entered Formula E, replacing its Renault affiliate.

Mercedes lists the top speed of its car as 174 mph, with an acceleration time of 0-60 mph in about 2.7 seconds.

READ MORE: New York race closes out Formula E season and multi-car strategy

The current season is the first with an all-new Gen2 racing car, with “halo” cockpit protection for the driver, higher power and top speeds, and no full-car swaps mid-race. At 52-kwh and 849 pounds, the battery that needs to power all Formula E cars for the entire 45-minute races is a product of McLaren Applied Technologies and Lucid Motors (Atieva), with Sony cells.

Three of 13 Season 5 races have already been held, with the next one on March 10 in Hong Kong and the season ending with two Brooklyn street circuit races on July 13-14, 2019.

Marshall buys Progress Group, adds more Skoda dealerships

Marshall Motor Holdings is claiming the title of the UK’s largest Skoda dealer after its takeover of Progress Group. Having recent added two outlets representing the Czech brand of Volkswagen Group from Sandicliffe Motor Group, it has now added four more Progress Skoda dealerships at Bedford, Harlow, Letchworth and Northampton. Once rebranded, these take the… Continue reading Marshall buys Progress Group, adds more Skoda dealerships

78% Of Tesla’s 2018 Model 3 Sales Were Online — Musk Email Sheds Light On New Sales Strategy

InvestElectric CarsElectric Car BenefitsElectric Car SalesSolar Energy RocksRSSAdvertisePrivacy Policy
Cars Published on March 3rd, 2019 | by Dr. Maximilian Holland
78% Of Tesla’s 2018 Model 3 Sales Were Online — Musk Email Sheds Light On New Sales StrategyTwitterLinkedInFacebookMarch 3rd, 2019 by Dr. Maximilian Holland

An email sent to Tesla employees by Elon Musk on Thursday explains some of the reasons for Tesla’s shift in sales strategy from brick-and-mortar stores to an online focus. Notably, 78% of all Model 3 sales in 2018 were already conducted online. Further, 82% of buyers didn’t even take a test drive before buying. Added to this, awareness of the Tesla brand is as strong as it has ever been, and prospective customers are forward-looking and tech-savvy, comfortable with online purchases. Transitioning from store-based sales to online sales, along with other efficiencies, reduces vehicle costs by an average 6%. That made this a priority area for overall savings and cost reductions.
The net effect of the shift is that Tesla’s vehicles are now being sold at more affordable price points, increasing demand and accelerating Tesla’s core mission.

Understanding the Change in Tesla’s Sales StrategyAny loss of jobs is never good news for those affected. It remains to be seen what proportion of store sales staff can be transitioned to roles in the galleries, showcases, and information centres that will be maintained in high traffic locations. There will be increasing positions in service and in manufacturing as well, but how many can transition to such jobs is unclear.
Tesla went from 899 employees in 2010 to an estimated 45,000 in Q4 last year, but with several periodic cutbacks to the workforce along the way. The cutbacks are unfortunate, but not unexpected in a fast evolving company seeking to ramp up the number of vehicles sold, learn on its feet, and seek cost efficiencies in every area of its operations.
In a phone-in session for journalists on Thursday, Musk called the move to online sales a “hard decision” which “unfortunately will entail a reduction” in the sales staff, but also called it an “extremely important strategic decision.”
Whilst the phone call did not go deep into the reasoning for the shift in sales strategy (instead focusing on the announcement of the $35,000 Model 3 and details about the car), the employee email on the same day did shed more light. I have attached the full text of the email at the end of this article. Obviously, reducing internal costs enough to enable the sale of the $35,000 Model 3 was a key proximate motivation for the strategy shift. But there’s also more context to understand the overall change in strategy. Amongst other points, the email noted that, in 2018:
“78% of all Model 3 orders were placed online, rather than in a store, and 82% of customers bought their Model 3 without ever having taken a test drive.”
Given that 140,000 Tesla Model 3s were sold in 2018, 78% online sales corresponds to almost 110,000 vehicles, of the 240,000 total 2018 vehicle sales (when we include Models S and X). That’s some 46% of the total. In 2019, the Model 3 will likely sell close to 300,000 units or more, and the S and X 80,000–100,000 (combined). This means that — assuming the same 78% online sales proportion of 2018 Model 3 sales — at least some 62% of overall sales would likely have come from online anyway, even without the recent changes.
The key question is: does Tesla actually need brick-and-mortar sales outlets to maintain brand awareness, drive demand, and create sales?

The EV Transition & Tesla’s Brand AwarenessConsider that, in the comments section of Zach’s recent article, one of our UK readers pointed out that the release of the $35,000 Model 3 was the #2 news story on the BBC. Given that the Tesla Model 3 won’t even begin delivery in the UK until sometime in the second half of 2019, that’s pretty healthy brand awareness right there.
There has been dramatic growth in awareness of EVs in general over the past couple of years. The vast majority of people who are considering transitioning to an EV are without doubt aware of Tesla. With the availability of the $35,000 variant of the Model 3, and low running costs, a Tesla EV is now within reach of a greater proportion of aspirational new car buyers in the key markets in which the company operates. Of the folks in these markets that are considering buying a new premium car anyway, many if not most of them are already aware of the Tesla brand. All in, it’s not hard to conceive that — even without brick-and-mortar sales stores — there’s enough demand to keep Tesla running at full production potential for at least the medium term. The upcoming Model Y reveal (and likely many more reservations) will only boost brand awareness and demand.
Tesla Model Y teaser.
Tesla has obviously crunched the numbers and decided that encouraging an online sales process — whilst keeping vehicles visible and curated by a few personnel in high-traffic areas in galleries (and similar locations) — will result in more than sufficient demand going forwards. Whilst being a calculated guesstimate, there’s surely a positive feedback between removing the significant cost of sales locations, thus allowing Tesla “to lower all vehicle prices by about 6% on average” (Musk email), thus bootstrapping relatively more demand and resulting in more customers overall.
As quoted above, that “82% of customers bought their Model 3 without ever having taken a test drive” shows that test drives are not needed for most prospective buyers to pull the trigger on a purchase — at least, they haven’t been. Tesla’s tweaked sales contract now allows customers who have not previously test driven the vehicle to return it within 7 days (or 1,000 miles) for a fast, full refund if they are not happy with the purchase. (This was also was part of the reasoning given in the employee email). Since driving a Tesla for the 1st time is invariably a revelation, the percentage of returns will likely be negligible. And there will likely still be some opportunities for test drives in key locations, even if that’s arranged via a service centre location (or even a mobile service/test drive) rather than a sales location per se. Our own Kyle Field got a home test drive from Tesla before purchasing his Model 3.

Finally, there are additional demand levers that Tesla can still pull if necessary. The company could readily re-introduce a referral program (albeit a more cost efficient and capped one). And leasing is not even offered yet on the Model 3. That’s a huge demand lever right there.
In short, with three Model 3 choices at price points between $35,000 and $40,000 — themselves to a large extent enabled by the move to an online sales focus — Tesla calculates that this reconfigured approach to sales and costs will generate more than enough demand going forwards, and further the company’s mission.
Whilst we can all agree that the loss of store sales jobs is sad, do you agree or disagree with Tesla’s reconfigured sales approach from the point of view of the business case? Please provide your own thoughts in the comments.
Here’s Elon Musk’s email to employees (Thursday, February 28):
Last month, I noted in my email that the fundamental issue Tesla must overcome is that our products remain too expensive for most people. We know there are many people who want to buy Model 3, but simply can’t afford to do so.
That is why we’re excited to announce today that we are now offering the standard Model 3 at $35,000. This is a significant milestone for Tesla, the culmination of years of hard work by employees across the company, and something of which you should all be very proud. You can read the details of the announcement on our blog: https://www.tesla.com/blog/35000-tesla-model-3-available-now
In addition, we are also making the decision to shift all sales worldwide to online only.
Last year, 78% of all Model 3 orders were placed online, rather than in a store, and 82% of customers bought their Model 3 without ever having taken a test drive. Customers can now buy a Tesla in North America via their phone in about 1 minute, and that capability will soon be extended worldwide. We are also making it much easier to try out and return a Tesla without a test drive. You can now return a car within 7 days or 1,000 miles for a full refund. Customers are becoming increasingly comfortable making purchases online, and that is especially true for Tesla — which is a testament to the products we make.
As a result, over the next few months, we will be winding down many of our stores and significantly reducing our spend on sales and marketing, which will help make the price changes we’ve announced today possible. Shifting all sales online combined with other ongoing cost efficiency will enable us to lower all vehicle prices by about 6% on average, allowing us to achieve the $35,000 Model 3 price point.
A small number of stores in high-traffic locations will remain as galleries, showcases and Tesla information centers. At the same time, we will be increasing our investment in the Tesla service system and manufacturing, and I expect that headcount to grow next year.
Unfortunately, this means that some jobs will be impacted or transitioned to other areas of the business. This is a hard decision, but it necessary to make our cars more affordable. Our sales team has fought on the front lines of advancing our mission and has been our connection to hundreds of thousands of customers along the way. I want to express my sincere gratitude for all that you’ve done.
In the coming weeks, we will be evaluating all of our sales and marketing organization to understand where there are operational efficiencies, and how best to support the transition to online sales while also continuing to deliver a truly awesome and educational Tesla buying experience.
We’ll be sharing more information on this transition soon.
Thank you,
Elon

About the ..

UPDATE 1-Tesla’s store-shuttering strategy may pull the rug out of solar

SAN FRANCISCO (Reuters) – Tesla Inc’s sudden decision to shutter the bulk of its stores around the world raises a red flag over the future of its solar branch, a declining business it paid $2.6 billion for in a controversial 2016 deal. FILE PHOTO: A SolarCity vehicle is shown in San Diego, California, U.S., November… Continue reading UPDATE 1-Tesla’s store-shuttering strategy may pull the rug out of solar

RPT-Tesla’s store-shuttering strategy may pull the rug out of solar

SAN FRANCISCO (Reuters) – Tesla Inc’s sudden decision to shutter the bulk of its stores around the world raises a red flag over the future of its solar branch, a declining business it paid $2.6 billion for in a controversial 2016 deal. FILE PHOTO: A SolarCity vehicle is shown in San Diego, California, U.S., November… Continue reading RPT-Tesla’s store-shuttering strategy may pull the rug out of solar