Why Our Company’s Trucks Won’t Carry Lidar 28 Nov

About the Cars That Think blog

IEEE Spectrum’s blog about the sensors, software, and systems that are making cars smarter, more entertaining, and ultimately, autonomous.

Follow @/CarsThatThink

Philip E. Ross, Senior Editor

Willie D. Jones, Assistant Editor

Evan Ackerman, Senior Writer

Lucas Laursen, Contributor

Subscribe to RSS Feed

  Luminar and Volvo Show Off High-Res, Long-Range Lidar 27 Nov

About the Cars That Think blog

IEEE Spectrum’s blog about the sensors, software, and systems that are making cars smarter, more entertaining, and ultimately, autonomous.

Follow @/CarsThatThink

Philip E. Ross, Senior Editor

Willie D. Jones, Assistant Editor

Evan Ackerman, Senior Writer

Lucas Laursen, Contributor

Subscribe to RSS Feed

  Daimler and Bosch Will Launch a Pilot Robotaxi Program in San Jose in 2019 8 Nov

About the Cars That Think blog

IEEE Spectrum’s blog about the sensors, software, and systems that are making cars smarter, more entertaining, and ultimately, autonomous.

Follow @/CarsThatThink

Philip E. Ross, Senior Editor

Willie D. Jones, Assistant Editor

Evan Ackerman, Senior Writer

Lucas Laursen, Contributor

Subscribe to RSS Feed

  Milton Keynes, the Model Town Building Itself Around Self-Driving Cars 21 Nov

About the Cars That Think blog

IEEE Spectrum’s blog about the sensors, software, and systems that are making cars smarter, more entertaining, and ultimately, autonomous.

Follow @/CarsThatThink

Philip E. Ross, Senior Editor

Willie D. Jones, Assistant Editor

Evan Ackerman, Senior Writer

Lucas Laursen, Contributor

Subscribe to RSS Feed

  An Airplane With No Moving Parts 21 Nov

About the Cars That Think blog

IEEE Spectrum’s blog about the sensors, software, and systems that are making cars smarter, more entertaining, and ultimately, autonomous.

Follow @/CarsThatThink

Philip E. Ross, Senior Editor

Willie D. Jones, Assistant Editor

Evan Ackerman, Senior Writer

Lucas Laursen, Contributor

Subscribe to RSS Feed

  Tesla Releases New Autopilot “Navigate” Feature 29 Oct

About the Cars That Think blog

IEEE Spectrum’s blog about the sensors, software, and systems that are making cars smarter, more entertaining, and ultimately, autonomous.

Follow @/CarsThatThink

Philip E. Ross, Senior Editor

Willie D. Jones, Assistant Editor

Evan Ackerman, Senior Writer

Lucas Laursen, Contributor

Subscribe to RSS Feed

  New Auto Safety Technologies Push Repair Bills Up 2 Nov

About the Risk Factor blog

IEEE Spectrum’s risk analysis blog, featuring daily news, updates and analysis on computing and IT projects, software and systems failures, successes and innovations, security threats, and more.

Follow @RiskFactorBlog

Robert Charette, Editor

Willie D. Jones, Contributor

Subscribe to RSS Feed

  Gill Pratt of Toyota: Safety Is No Argument for Robocars 10 Oct

Photo: Toyota

Advertisement

Editor’s Picks

GM Says: Look, Ma, No Steering Wheel

The Big Problem With Self-Driving Cars Is People

Toyota's Gill Pratt on Self-Driving Cars and the Reality of Full Autonomy

Going for Level 4 autonomy—where the car drives itself and you can go to sleep—is typically justified on the grounds that such cars will be very safe. And they had better be, or we’d never let them loose on the roads.

But the safety-first argument is flawed, says Gill Pratt, who heads up self-driving car research for Toyota. Reason: Safety can be obtained by other means.

“The reason for Level 4 being done—to save lives—is backwards thinking, even if you assume it’ll be 10 times safer,” he tells IEEE Spectrum. “That’s not the only way to save lives; there are multiple ways to do it.”

Pratt allows that there’s a purely economic argument for self-driving cars—remove the driver and you cut expenses in any commercial application, like taxi service and trucking. But that decides things only after self-driving tech can be proven far better than the best human driver. A system that’s just 10 percent better will win over statisticians and philosophers but not the general public.

This isn’t the first time Pratt has poured cold water on the idea that we’re on the verge of getting rid of the steering wheel and pedals, as GM Cruise plans to do in a pilot program next year. Read our Q&A with him from early last year. But nowadays, Pratt’s emphasizing how a system that is essentially Level 4 can be repurposed as a teammate to the driver, rather than a replacement.

Toyota is developing Level 4 systems, he said, but when they’re purposed to drive the car—and thus called Chauffeur—they need vastly more validation than has been done yet to be made into a generally useful product. Toyota doesn’t expect to hand a Level 4 Chauffeur to the public for years, though the company plans to demonstrate one during the 2020 Olympic Games, in Japan, within a relatively limited environment.

But what Pratt calls the “technological equivalent to Level 4” is coming much faster. It’s called Guardian, and he says it’s a lot better than today’s advanced driver assistance systems (ADAS), which offer lane keeping, active cruise control, and emergency braking. “We think Guardian features will trickle into production vehicles soon,” he says.

Here’s how it looks in practice:

Guardian uses a diversity of sensors and maps which, though they might be a little out of date, at least tell the system the most likely environment it’s in and the location of the car in that environment. A prediction system figures out how the environment around the car is likely to evolve, and then a planner works out the car’s trajectory and other behaviors.

“It asks if there’s an unprotected left-hand turn or a highway merge coming up,” he says. “When the system’s functioning as Guardian, it’s there to warn or nudge the driver, and if things are really bad, to take over temporarily.”

We already have a Level 2 system—the Super Cruise function, which is available in the Cadillac CT6. As Lawrence Ulrich reported in April, it’s the current self-driving champion of production cars. But to make sure that the driver doesn’t get lulled into dangerous complacency, the car uses cameras to observe the driver’s eyes and body posture and to jostle him or her back to situational awareness if necessary.

But Pratt suggests that approach reflects backward thinking, too.

“We’ve known since the 1940s that the better the autonomy, the more you tend to overtrust the system,” Pratt says. “That’s why Super Cruise has a monitor that watches you. In Guardian, we’ve flipped the whole nature of who guards whom: We have the person drive.”

  Fireproof Lithium-Ion Batteries That Harden When Hit 22 Aug

Gabriel Veith

Adding powdered silica (in blue container) to the plastic layer (white sheet) that separates electrodes inside a test battery (gold bag) will prevent lithium-ion battery fires.

Advertisement

Editor’s Picks

Ionic Materials Expands Lab Where It Makes Safer, More Efficient Lithium Batteries From Plastic

Solid Electrolyte Leads to Safer Energy-Dense Li-ion Batteries

Will a New Glass Battery Accelerate the End of Oil?

To make lithium-ion batteries safer, researchers have come up with a novel solution: a liquid electrolyte that becomes solid on impact. The electrolyte could keep batteries from heating up and bursting into flames when they are in a car crash or take a hard fall. And it could be cost-effectively and easily employed in today’s battery production lines, its developers say.

Lithium-ion battery cells contain two electrodes separated by a thin plastic sheet and submerged in a liquid electrolyte. If the plastic separator breaks, the electrodes can “touch” each other, shorting the battery and heating it up, which could cause the volatile liquid electrolyte to ignite.

For years, researchers have been trying to make batteries safer with nonflammable solid electrolytes. But these solids, typically plastics or ceramics, don’t conduct ions as well as their liquid counterparts. Some groups are also making batteries with paste-like semi-solid electrolytes and glassy electrolytes.

Gabriel Veith and his colleagues at Oak Ridge National Laboratory instead made an electrolyte that is normally a liquid but becomes solid when subjected to strain. So if a battery is crushed or penetrated, the electrolyte would harden, keeping the electrodes from coming in contact. The researchers are presenting their work at the American Chemical Society’s meeting in Boston.

The recipe for the electrolyte is straightforward. Veith was inspired by materials known as shear-thickening fluids. A simple example is a suspension of corn starch and water, known in kid circles as oobleck. When you hit oobleck with some force, it thickens and feels hard because the cornstarch particles come together.

Veith and his colleagues added 200-nanometer-wide silica particles to a conventional liquid electrolyte, which is a dilute solution of lithium salts. The silica nanoparticles come together in the new electrolyte and make it a hard solid, not just a thick liquid. The key to the behavior is controlling the size of the nanoparticles. “We find that particle sizes have to be very, very uniform,” Veith says. “We’re talking plus or minus a nanometer.” The researchers turn out nearly identical particles using a highly controlled chemical process known as the Stöber method.

The material remains solid as long as the battery is under strain, he says. And as an added bonus, silica also absorbs heat, so the electrolyte does not catch fire as easily.

In the lab, batteries tested with the new solidifying electrolyte behave roughly the same as those filled with liquid. The silica nanoparticles do reduce the electrolyte’s ability to conduct ions, which reduces the battery’s capacity and slows down charging. The capacity of a battery is measured in C rates, where 1C is the ability of a battery to charge or discharge in 1 hour, and 2C is charging in 30 minutes. “Our battery works well at rates of up to 2C, which is okay for most electronics,” Veith says.

As opposed to switching to solid electrolytes, the silica-laced electrolyte could be incorporated into current battery manufacturing processes. It would require first loading the plastic separator with silica nanoparticles and injecting the liquid electrolyte into a prepared cell. The silica would then diffuse into the electrolyte. “It’s a drop-in tech rather than revamping your production lines,” Veith says.