The US state has introduced a new law that makes manufacturers more responsible.
The manufacturer Tesla has an assistance system that he likes to call Full Self Driving (FSD) or Enhanced Autopilot designated. However, neither is true, because the car is neither actually able to drive itself nor is it an autopilot. Next to the criticism of the terminology you have to have some too fatalities and accidents complain because many people thought the car could drive itself. The US agency NHTSA examines the accidents and the Californian Department of Motor Vehicles (DMV) criticizes a false application.
But that’s not all, because California introduced a law that primarily targets Tesla’s system, even if the company is of course not explicitly mentioned. The law was probably inspired by the DMV’s complaint about Tesla’s confusing advertising. Although Tesla makes it clear on the website that the cars need full control at all times, they also advertise with irritating terms and statements.
The draft law makes it clear that the designation of autonomous or semi-autonomous features must not be misleading. It states that it is not allowed to use language that misleads into assuming that the car would drive itself or would contain functions that are not there. This is considered misleading advertising.
Furthermore, more transparency is required. Such car sales are not permitted if at the time of purchase the car does not have the advertised features, even if they are added later via an update. A clear indication of this is required.
If the draft is ratified, Tesla would have to name its autopilot system differently. However, only in California. However, insiders do not believe that the draft will become law.