How UAW’s transforming itself ahead of contract talks with automakers

The UAW will take a new direction under a new and relatively unknown leader after what’s been a turbulent few years as the union emerges from a scandal and enters a new era of unifying to fight for a new contract with Detroit automakers.

For the first time, the UAW has a leader elected by the rank-and-file. On Saturday, Shawn Fain was declared the winner over incumbent President Ray Curry in a runoff election. On Sunday, Fain was sworn in and the next day he took to the podium at the union’s bargaining convention in Detroit to declare it is “a new day in the UAW.” Fain said the union must present a united front after the divisive election and when it comes to contract talks this year, the union will be ready to fight for more gains.

Newly elected union President Shawn Fain called it a "new day in the UAW" during the first day of the union's special bargaining convention Monday in Detroit.

More:UAW to bring militant negotiations like Detroit Three haven’t seen in years, experts say

Here’s background on where the UAW stands today.

Why are there two factions in the UAW?

For more than 70 years, the UAW had one group in charge. That group, which came to be known as the administration caucus, oversaw a growing union that was able to deliver for its members in the years when the domestic auto industry was the undisputed king. In recent decades, however, the caucus was in charge as the domestic auto industry faced increased competition from foreign automakers and a reckoning during the financial crisis that led the union to agree to concessions such as tier wages. Efforts to challenge the administration caucus gained momentum after a corruption scandal, involving the misuse of millions of dollars of worker training funds and dues money. The scandal sent former top union officials and auto executives to prison. The union avoided a federal takeover by agreeing to reforms that included a referendum — which a dissident group known as Unite All Workers for Democracy championed — on the way the union picks its top leaders. That dissident caucus increasingly began to challenge the administration caucus, and with the success of candidates associated with Unite All Workers for Democracy in the recent election, the union now has two clear factions operating.

How was this election different from previous years?

This was first time the UAW membership chose its leaders in a direct election, which reform advocates pitch as more democratic. Previously, delegates from UAW locals chose the union’s leaders at its conventions. Delegates from union locals are still part of the nominating process, and they play a big role in the current special bargaining convention by voting on the resolutions that will come out of the convention. The election, which was overseen by an independent, court-appointed monitor as a result of the agreement with the government, included two slates of candidates, one supported by the dissidents and one supported by the administration caucus, as well as a number of independent candidates.

How were the two main candidates viewed?

Automakers saw Curry as someone with whom they had developed a working relationship. Some union members, including some rank-and-file, viewed him as an experienced negotiator and stable leader who was instrumental in helping to move the union forward after the scandal. But others in the rank-and-file thought Curry was too chummy with the establishment and would not push hard enough to get what the workers want.