Car buyers considering an EV have more options thanks to a weird loophole in the law

Car buyers considering an electric vehicle now have more options to ease their pocketbook thanks to a loophole in the Inflation Reduction Act that allows vehicles made outside of North America to qualify for the tax credits anyhow.

The government laid out the IRA’s rules last year. It specified: For a buyer to get some or all of a $7,500 federal tax credit, the EV had to be assembled in North America and the battery and a percentage of other components could not be sourced by “a foreign entity of concern” — which many interpret to be China. Beginning next year and in following years, an eligible clean vehicle can’t contain any critical minerals that were sourced by a foreign entity of concern.

There are also price caps and income caps to meet: A car has to be priced less than $55,000, and pickups or SUVs must be less than $80,000. The income for an individual buyer has to be less than $150,000 a year and for a household, less than $300,000 annually.

General Motors' 2024 Chevy Silverado EV. (Credit: Provided by General Motors)

But because of a loophole Congress put in the law in August, which the U.S. Treasury defined in December, consumers can now capture that full incentive by leasing the car rather than buying it — regardless of where it is made, where the materials are sourced or any of the other rules.

“The tax credit for leased EVs is more Washington theater where politicians boast about their support for U.S. industry but don’t mention the loopholes lobbyists bought that gut the pretend support,” said Erik Gordon, of the University of Michigan’s Ross School of Business. “Any car that is leased is classified as a commercial vehicle, even if it is a two-seat convertible. It would make more sense to classify tennis rackets as medical equipment because you get exercise when you use them.”

Trading partners revolted

The reason behind Washington lawmakers’ wishy-washiness lies in the nation’s relations to its trading partners, who objected after President Joe Biden’s administration laid out the rules intended to support domestic EV development, said Chad Bown, senior fellow at the Peterson Institute for International Economics.