Here’s what happened when UAW, Detroit Three leaders kicked off bargaining

UAW President Shawn Fain speaks with the media during the shift change at GM's Factory Zero in Detroit on July 12, the day before the launch of contract talks with the Detroit Three.

If it wasn’t clear before contract talks opened this month between the UAW and Ford, General Motors and Stellantis that this round of negotiations would take a different tone than years past, a flurry of announcements in recent days sharing what happened during those initial meetings has made the point firmly.

United Auto Workers union leaders had pledged more transparency about the negotiations — and that approach is being used by the automakers, too, with all three either launching or saying they would launch websites that would include bargaining information. The union has its own bargaining web pages focused on each automaker, as well.

Several automaker and union leaders have also already issued memos or letters to the press, union officials and employees offering their takes so far. This move follows the union’s decision last week to ditch the traditional ceremonial handshake with company leaders in favor of a meet-and-greet members’ handshake outside the gates of three Detroit-area auto plants.

“Both sides realize that they have entered a new era of bargaining,” said Marick Masters, a business professor and labor expert at Wayne State University who cited changes in the union for the tone shift. “This is driven primarily by recent changes in the makeup of the leadership of the UAW due to the historic direct elections that took place a few months ago. Under Shawn Fain and his UAWD (Unite All Workers for Democracy) allies, the UAW has a much more bottom-up approach toward governance and bargaining. This requires more transparency and openness in terms of rank-and-file participation on an ongoing basis.

“The UAW seeks to galvanize the workers on a bargaining position that will yield sustainable improvements in contract terms.”

Masters, however, highlighted the challenges ahead for the union and the automakers.

“The issues at stake between the Detroit Three and the UAW are difficult and costly, and only a partial solution may be achievable through collective bargaining. Because of the political and public-policy significance of electrification, it may be necessary for government to aid the effort to find a longer-term solution through policies that subsidize wages and change labor laws to facilitate union organizing. This itself is a heavy lift, but clearly all parties are to varying degrees dependent on each other and government intervention for electrification … to succeed,” Masters said.