Stellantis leader says negotiations with UAW require ‘focus on reality’

Mark Stewart, Stellantis' lead executive in North America, pushed back in a letter to employees on Friday against UAW President Shawn Fain's recent Facebook Live appearance where Fain threw the company's contract proposal in the trash.

The head of Stellantis in North America is pushing back after UAW President Shawn Fain recently tossed the company’s contract proposal in the garbage.

Mark Stewart, chief operating officer for Stellantis North America, said he was “incredibly disappointed” to see Fain’s online communications earlier in the week, presumably referring to Fain’s dramatic Facebook Live video on Tuesday where he described the proposal as “trash.”

Stellantis, which owns the Jeep, Ram, Chrysler, Dodge and Fiat brands, is negotiating with the United Auto Workers union, along with Ford and General Motors, ahead of the expiration of their contracts next month. The talks and the lead-up to them have been marked by assertive comments from the union and predictions from numerous industry watchers of a strike.

Stewart, in a letter to employees Friday posted on a company website focused on negotiations, suggested that Fain’s approach was counterproductive.

“It does not fairly represent what is happening in these negotiations. The theatrics and personal insults will not help us reach an agreement that continues our proud history of providing good wages and benefits to our employees and maintaining Stellantis’ ability to be competitive in the market. These negotiations are critical and require cool heads and a focus on reality from everyone involved,” the letter said.

Stewart also dismissed the idea that the company isn’t focused on UAW demands, which include “double-digit pay increases,” restoration of cost-of-living adjustments and a right to strike over plant closures, among other issues.

“Let me assure you that the company is taking the negotiations process very seriously. Our negotiators are listening to the union’s position and seeking to understand their point of view,” the letter said, noting that “we expect the same courtesy and professionalism from Mr. Fain. At this very early stage, no one should jump to any conclusions about the outcome of this process.”