Union Road Transport and Highways Minister Nitin Gadkari today strongly refuted concerns surrounding the implementation of E20 fuel (20% ethanol-blended petrol), calling allegations against the policy a “political campaign” aimed at targeting him personally. Speaking at the Society of Indian Automobile Manufacturers (SIAM) annual convention in Delhi, Gadkari asserted there was “no truth” to the criticisms that have emerged on social media platforms.
Addressing industry stakeholders, Gadkari acknowledged that automobile companies had initially expressed concerns about E20 compatibility with existing vehicle engines. He noted that the Automotive Research Association of India (ARAI) and other technical bodies had submitted their findings on the matter, and that even the Supreme Court had taken cognizance of the industry’s position.
“The concerned auto companies. ARAI and others submitted their findings. The Supreme Court also took their stand,” Gadkari stated, before dismissing the social media backlash as politically motivated rather than technically grounded.
Background of the E20 Push
The Indian government has been aggressively promoting ethanol blending as part of its strategy to reduce petroleum imports and carbon emissions. The E20 fuel program, which mandates 20% ethanol blending with petrol, was originally targeted for nationwide implementation by 2025, later advanced to 2023 in some states.
The policy forms a crucial component of India’s energy security strategy and commitment to reducing its carbon footprint. Ethanol, primarily derived from sugarcane and food grains, is seen as a cleaner alternative that could help India save billions in foreign exchange while supporting farmers.
Industry Concerns and Technical Challenges
However, the rollout has faced resistance from various quarters. Automobile manufacturers have raised concerns about potential engine damage, reduced fuel efficiency, and increased maintenance costs for vehicles not specifically designed for high ethanol blends. Consumer groups have also questioned whether older vehicles can safely use E20 fuel without modifications.
Environmental activists have additionally pointed to concerns about food security, arguing that diverting agricultural produce for fuel could impact food prices and availability.
Political Dimensions
Gadkari’s characterization of the criticism as a “political campaign” comes amid intensifying debates over the policy on social media platforms. The minister, known for his ambitious infrastructure and transport initiatives, suggested that opposition to E20 was less about technical merit and more about political opportunism.
The controversy highlights the challenges facing India’s renewable energy transition, where technological, economic, and political considerations often intersect. As the government pushes ahead with its ethanol blending targets, the industry and consumers await further clarity on implementation timelines and technical standards.