Lawyers question how the executive, who had been banned from leaving Japan, had managed to escape without any of his passports
Carlos Ghosn has left Japan and arrived in Lebanon, according to media reports, but it is not clear whether he has fled or has negotiated new bail conditions.
Photograph: Kazuhiro Nogi/AFP via Getty Images
Japan is urgently investigating after former Renault-Nissan chairman Carlos Ghosn fled court-imposed bail ahead of his trial on charges of financial misconduct and arrived in Lebanon where he said he would “escape injustice”.
Ghosn issued a statement on Tuesday morning in which he said he would “no longer be held hostage by a rigged Japanese justice system where guilt is presumed”.
“I have not fled justice – I have escaped injustice and political persecution,” Ghosn said in the statement, adding that he could “finally communicate freely with the media, and look forward to starting next week”.
It was not clear how Ghosn, who had surrendered his passports as part of his bail conditions and barred from leaving Japan, had fled the country.
One of Ghosn’s Japanese lawyers told reporters on Tuesday that his legal team were still holding all three of his passports and that he could not have used any of them to escape Japan. The former auto executive has French and Lebanese citizenship and was born in Brazil.
Junichiro Hironaka said he had not spoken to Ghosn since last week and that he was “surprised” by his client’s arrival in Lebanon. His client’s actions were “inexcusable”, he said.
Ghosn arrived in Beirut from Turkey on a private plane, Lebanese newspaper Al Joumhouria said, adding that he was expected to hold a news conference in the coming days. “Ghosn reached Beirut, but it’s unclear how he left Japan,” Agence France-Presse quoted a Lebanese security official as saying.
Japanese public broadcaster NHK cited an anonymous source as saying the Japanese immigration authorities had no record of a Carlos Ghosn leaving the country, and authorities were reviewing whether he left using another name.
There is no extradition agreement between Japan and Lebanon.
Masahisa Sato, an MP from Shinzo Abe’s ruling Liberal Democrat party, said: “It was not ‘departing the country’, it was an illegal departure and an escape, and this itself is a crime.
“Was there help extended by an unnamed country? It is also a serious problem that Japan’s system allowed an illegal departure so easily.”
The Tokyo prosecutor’s office had no comment when contacted about Ghosn and a Nissan spokesman declined to comment. A spokeswoman for the Lebanese embassy in Tokyo said: “We did not receive any information.”
Agnes Pannier-Runacher, a junior minister in the French government, said she was “very surprised” by Ghosn’s flight to Lebanon. She told France Inter radio that no one was above the law but Ghosn would be able to get French consular support.
Ghosn, 65, who rescued Nissan from the brink of bankruptcy two decades ago and masterminded a successful alliance with Renault, was arrested in November 2018 shortly after arriving in Japan on his private jet. He faces four charges, including hiding income and enriching himself through payments to dealerships in the Middle East.
He has consistently denied the charges and spent more than 120 days in detention before being released on bail for a second time in late April. His treatment drew international criticism and claims that prosecutors were subjecting him to “inhuman” treatment.
Japan’s justice system has been criticised at home and abroad during Ghosn’s detention for provisions that allow suspects to be held for long periods. One of the reasons used to justify his detention before he was allowed out on bail was that he was considered a flight risk.
Ghosn’s bail conditions required him to surrender his passport and remain at a court-designated house in Tokyo preparing for his trial, which was expected to begin in April. He was forbidden from seeing his Lebanese-born wife, Carole Nahas, without special permission, and had limited internet access.
Ghosn said in a video message in April that he had been unfairly portrayed by “backstabbing” Nissan executives as “a personage of greed and a personage of dictatorship”.
He said he had been the victim of a boardroom coup, accusing former colleagues of targeting him in an attempt to derail a closer alliance between Nissan and Renault.