Stellantis plan to end Jeep joint venture in China leaves analysts pondering what’s next

Stellantis is resetting its Jeep brand plans for the Chinese market, where the company and its predecessors have struggled to make an impact.

Rather than producing Jeeps in China, the company said in a news release Monday, it will support the brand’s customers in the world’s largest automotive market with an “electrified lineup of imported Jeep vehicles and experienced Chinese dealers.”

The company said it would terminate its joint venture with China’s GAC Group, which it noted had been a money loser in recent years, and it would report a $302 million (297 million euros) non-cash impairment charge in its financial results for the first half of this year, which are scheduled to be released on July 28.

The company had said earlier this year that it would take a majority share in the joint venture, but on Monday cited a “lack of progress” in its plans. GAC Group did not respond to a Free Press request for comment. Reuters said GAC had “reprimanded” Stellantis over its announcement in January that it would boost its share of the joint venture.

The joint venture dates to 2010, well before Fiat Chrysler Automobiles merged last year with Peugeot maker PSA Group to form Stellantis.

The news does not mean Stellantis is out of China. The company also has a joint venture with Dongfeng Motor to produce Peugeot and Citroen vehicles, according to company spokesperson Fernao Silveira.

However, the announcement prompted a number of analysts to ponder what’s next for the automaker and its key Jeep brand.

Karl Brauer, executive analyst at iSeeCars.com, said that even though the joint venture hadn’t yet proven profitable, it would be difficult to see the change as a “positive long-term move.”

“China is the largest automotive market, and every global automaker has to find success in this region or risk losing ground to competitors,” Brauer said. “It’s certainly possible to build cars outside of China and import them for sale, but there are substantial financial disadvantages to that arrangement. It’s also discouraging to see a recognized and powerful global brand like Jeep struggle to achieve profitability in this joint venture.”