Elon Musk suspected sabotage when Tesla factory robots stopped working earlier this month

Joshua Lott | Getty Images
Engineer and tech entrepreneur Elon Musk of The Boring Company talks about constructing a high speed transit tunnel at Block 37 during a news conference on June 14, 2018 in Chicago, Illinois.

Elon Musk was up early on Saturday. He departed Los Angeles, where he runs SpaceX, his private rocket venture, and flew north in his white Gulfstream jet. Stopping in Silicon Valley, he picked up two engineers from Tesla, his electric-car company. They flew on to Reno, Nev., where they spent the day at Tesla's battery plant, the Gigafactory.

It might have been just another workday for Mr. Musk — a multistate jaunt to personally fix a drive-unit production line. But this was no ordinary morning. He was a brief night's sleep removed from one of his most consequential decisions: scrapping his plan to take Tesla private.

It was an abrupt about-face, and it capped a tumultuous two and a half weeks that began with a single tweet and wound up roiling markets, setting off regulatory alarms and raising questions about his judgment. Even by Mr. Musk's standards — this is a C.E.O. who believes Tesla is under attack by saboteurs, has a personal life playing out in the gossip blogs and is prone to fiery outbursts on Twitter — it has been a time of high intrigue.

“The reason Elon seems to attract drama is that he is so transparent, so open, in a way that can come back to bite him,” said Kimbal Musk, Mr. Musk's younger brother and a Tesla board member. “He doesn't know how to do it differently. It's just who he is.”

Mr. Musk, a brilliant but erratic billionaire, is the animating force behind Tesla, responsible for everything from its push into renewable energy to the design of the air vents in its newest electric car. His singular role gives him extraordinary influence over the fate of Tesla, its more than 40,000 employees and its investors.

Associates, including several people inside the company interviewed over the past week, portray him as a workaholic who zeroes in on the smallest details. His deep involvement suggests that the company can't do without him. Yet these days, it's not always clear that he knows what's best for Tesla.

More from The New York Times:
Google Attacked by Trump With Claim It Is Burying Conservative News
Silicon Valley Takes a (Careful) Step Toward Autonomous Flying
In a Shift in Driverless Strategy, Uber Deepens Its Partnership With Toyota

Even before taking Tesla investors on a roller-coaster ride, Mr. Musk was increasingly unpredictable, marketing flamethrowers online and dispatching a submarine to assist in a rescue in Thailand, then calling a critic of the gesture a pedophile. In an interview this month with The New York Times, Mr. Musk said he was physically exhausted and emotionally drained, causing some to question his fitness for the job.

Mr. Musk's personal life is no less chaotic. He was dating Grimes, the Canadian pop musician, but the two stopped following each other on social media last week, leading gossip blogs to speculate they had broken up. That followed a bizarre run-in with the rapper Azealia Banks, who intimated that Mr. Musk had written his going-private tweet while on acid. (He denied it.) Amid the fallout, he took to Twitter, posting cryptic messages about love and quoting T. S. Eliot.

And at the office, he is hardly a typical chief executive. Racing to resolve critical production issues, he can often be found on the factory floor, working to fix robots. At night, he sometimes sleeps under his desk. All the while, he has been confronting an exodus of senior employees, preparing to be interviewed by the Securities and Exchange Commission, and was working with Goldman Sachs and Saudi Arabia's sovereign wealth fund to take Tesla private — until he wasn't.

Some board members have been dismayed at Mr. Musk's behavior, according to people familiar with the directors' thinking, but no active search is underway for a replacement — although there have been fitful efforts to find a top lieutenant.

James Anderson, the head of the asset management firm Baillie Gifford, Tesla's biggest shareholder after Mr. Musk, said he still had faith in the 47-year-old chief executive, calling him a “visionary leader” who had unmatched technical expertise and remained “obsessive about the details.”

Yet Mr. Anderson said he had grown increasingly worried about Mr. Musk, believing that his volatile personal life and intense work ethic were taking a steep toll. “He is so demanding, so driven by the imperative to do something good for the world,” Mr. Anderson said. “You could always see something like this happening.”

'We feel like we are at war'

At 6:30 a.m. on Aug. 18, three robots in the paint shop at the Tesla factory in Fremont, Calif., started malfunctioning. The incident forced a production halt on the Model 3, the key to the company's future.

Made aware of the stoppage, Mr. Musk went to the factory and worked into the night. The problem was resolved, but Tesla reached a troubling conclusion: The robots had been infected with malware in an act of industrial sabotage. And though they could not prove it, executives suspected they knew the culprit: a rogue employee, working at the behest of short-sellers.

Tesla is among the most shorted stocks, meaning that hedge funds are betting against it and quick to note a missed production goal or cash shortfall. David Einhorn, the billionaire founder of Greenlight Capital, is in that camp. In a letter to investors last month detailing his argument, Mr. Einhorn wrote, “Elon Musk appears erratic and desperate.”

Mr. Musk believes that the short-sellers spread misinformation about the company, and perhaps much worse. In June, Mr. Musk accused an employee of sabotage that had slowed Model 3 production, and suggested short-sellers might be to blame.

Kimbal Musk, reflecting on the battles with short-sellers, said, “We feel like we are at war.”

Plenty of other companies face the wrath of short-sellers. The issue at Tesla seems to be that for Mr. Musk — who talks earnestly about weaning the world off fossil fuels with Tesla, and colonizing the solar system with SpaceX — these attacks are not just the cost of doing business. They are malicious and misguided efforts to derail his efforts to help humanity.

“Tesla is his baby,” said Deepak Ahuja, Tesla's chief financial officer. “He takes it extremely personally.”

But with Tesla now staying public, Mr. Musk will have to continue to contend with those who doubt his vision and are rooting for Tesla to fail.

The most difficult time

When Mr. Musk ceremonially unveiled the Model 3 last summer, he billed it as the first mass-market electric vehicle, and predicted monthly production of 20,000 by year's end. But in the final three months of 2017, just 2,425 were completed.

The delays were a result of what Mr. Musk called “manufacturing hell,” an inferno that has preoccupied him for much of the past year. “This has been the most difficult time for Tesla,” said JB Straubel, the company's chief technical officer. “We knew this was going to be the case, but it's been even harder than any of us expected.”

Some of the wounds were self-inflicted.

In preparing the assembly lines, Mr. Musk became convinced that the process should be close to fully automated, using robots rather than humans whenever possible. Doing so, he believed, could make cars move through the factory at one meter per second, 10 to 20 times the speed of existing lines.

So Tesla built a factory with hundreds of robots, many programmed to perform tasks that humans could easily do. One robot, which Mr. Musk nicknamed the “flufferbot,” was designed to simply place a sound-dampening piece of fiberglass atop the battery pack.

But the flufferbot never really worked. It would fail to pick up the fiberglass, or put it in the wrong place, frequently delaying production. It was eventually replaced by factory workers.

Mr. Musk has accepted responsibility for some of these missteps, occasionally with humor. In late June, he wore a T-shirt depicting a robot that passes butter. It was an inside joke, lampooning the notion of technology for technology's sake.

After the debacle, Mr. Musk tweeted: “Excessive automation at Tesla was a mistake. To be precise, my mistake. Humans are underrated.”

As the challenges have mounted, Mr. Musk has thrown himself into his work, spending hours each week walking factory floors, trying to diagnose and fix various problems on the assembly line.

“He demands personal accountability from the people that are closest to the machines,” Mr. Straubel said. “This freaks people out. They are worried that they wi..

Fiat Chrysler’s Cheapskate Strategy for the Future of Driving

Terms of Service Violation Your usage has been flagged as a violation of our terms of service. For inquiries related to this message please contact support. For sales inquiries, please visit http://www.bloomberg.com/professional/request-demo If you believe this to be in error, please confirm below that you are not a robot by clicking “I’m not a robot”… Continue reading Fiat Chrysler’s Cheapskate Strategy for the Future of Driving

Tesla board should rein in Elon Musk’s tweets and appoint a second in command: Former Toyota exec

Elon Musk needs a number two to help run Tesla: Experts
3 Hours Ago | 06:19

Tesla CEO Elon Musk should not step down, but the board should really consider regulating Musk's Twitter use and appointing Musk a “No. 2,” Jim Press, former COO and president of Toyota Motor Sales U.S.A., told CNBC on Monday.

“Twitter helps instantly communicate, so there are some advantages to it, but it needs to be disciplined and needs to be throttled in, I think,” Press, who was also the deputy CEO of Chrysler, said on CNBC's “Closing Bell.”

Just weeks after an Aug. 7 tweet in which Musk said he was considering taking Tesla private at $420 per share and had “funding secured,” he abandoned the idea. In a Friday blog post, Musk explained that “it's apparent most of Tesla's existing shareholders believe we are better off as a public company.”

But that may not be enough to dissuade the Securities and Exchange Commission, which, according to a New York Times report on Aug. 15, served Tesla with a subpoena to determine whether Musk violated securities laws by claiming he had funding for the take-private maneuver.

Furthermore, Musk himself has been criticized for erratic behavior, both online and off. He confessed in an interview with The New York Times the toll of the “excruciating” year he has had leading Tesla, particularly when crunching to meet Model 3 production goals.

“Twitter has become this direct line of public communication,” Press said. “And in a good company with governance, you've got coordination, and you're working through a communications strategy within the organization. It seems to me that [Tesla's Twitter activity] needs to go through a more formal channel to be part of exactly what the company is saying.”

Vocal Tesla short Gabe Hoffman, who founded activist hedge fund Accipiter Capital Management, thinks Musk's go-private tweet was more than just a slip-up in corporate communications.

“This was, in my view, the most egregious and naked example of securities fraud I have ever seen from a CEO in my 18 years as a hedge-fund manager,” Hoffman said Monday on “Closing Bell.”

“I believe imminently, in the next couple of months, Elon Musk will be removed as CEO of Tesla,” Hoffman added.

William G. Pietersen, businessman and professor at Columbia University Graduate School of Business, placed some of the blame for the behavior of an “overwhelmed and emotionally exhausted” Musk on Tesla's board.

“If you think about a board's responsibility of oversight — to make sure there's a strong strategy in place to lead the company to a good place, that there's a team that's able to implement that strategy and to be able to … insist that the CEO, in the interest of shareholders, undertakes those steps — I think there's a fundamental governance issue of responsibility here,” Pietersen said in a “Closing Bell” interview.

But critical of the situation as Pietersen was, he said the frazzled CEO doesn't necessarily need to leave the company. He should really rethink how the company is being run, Pietersen said.

“The truth of the matter is this classic dilemma of whether the original visionary can lead a large, complex organization with a lot of operating problems,” Pietersen said. “Leadership is a team sport; it's not a solo effort. And I think if you show me a successful company, I'll show you a strong leader that can lead a strong team.”

Press, who just last week defended Musk's vision, agreed and maintained that Musk was still the right one to lead Tesla, so long as he had a team underneath him.

“He's really the visionary; he's the creative genius. His imprint is really on the company, but he has to stay high enough to stay strategic and let somebody else worry about the day-to-day business. A 'No. 2' makes a lot of sense,” Press said.

“It seems logical as this company grows to bring in somebody to worry about growing the company, operating it day-to-day, and allowing him to really focus on strategy,” he added.

Tesla closed down 1.10 percent at $319.27. Tesla is down about 8.3 percent year over year.

Tesla: Bull and Bear investors debate
4 Hours Ago | 05:20

AutoX is using its self-driving vehicles to deliver groceries

Autonomous vehicle startup AutoX has launched a grocery delivery and mobile store pilot in a partnership with GrubMarket.com and local high-end grocery store DeMartini Orchard. The pilot will initially be limited to an area of about 400 homes in north San Jose. The company, which employees nearly 90 people, has just two autonomous vehicles that… Continue reading AutoX is using its self-driving vehicles to deliver groceries

Ford Taps Baumbick to Head Product Line Management; Deeper Customer and Market Insights Key to New Approach

Ford is establishing 10 product line management teams to better meet emerging customer needs, drive top-line growth and maximize returns   Ford appoints Jim Baumbick as vice president, Enterprise Product Line Management, to lead the teams, which will include cross-functional expertise in engineering, product planning, manufacturing, marketing, and finance The new Enterprise Product Line Management organization… Continue reading Ford Taps Baumbick to Head Product Line Management; Deeper Customer and Market Insights Key to New Approach

Quanergy Announces Expansion of Manufacturing Facility

SUNNYVALE, Calif.–(BUSINESS WIRE)–Quanergy Systems Inc., a global leader in the design and development of LiDAR sensors and smart sensing solutions, today announced the expansion of its current manufacturing facility located in Sunnyvale, California. The expanded factory doubles the size of the facility and is part of Quanergy’s strategy to increase its global manufacturing capacity to… Continue reading Quanergy Announces Expansion of Manufacturing Facility

China Turns To CHAdeMO For Fast Charging: Single Unified Standard

CHAdeMO signs an MoU with China Electricity Council (CEC) for co-development of next generation ultra-fast EV charging standard New ultra-fast charging standard will ensure backward compatibility with both current CHAdeMO and GB/T standards, in order not to penalize current EV users Both Japanese and Chinese governments support this industry initiative, which is expected to lead… Continue reading China Turns To CHAdeMO For Fast Charging: Single Unified Standard

Second profit warning: Continental loses the confidence of investors

HannoverFour four weeks ago, optimism dominated in Hannover. Continental, Germany’s second largest automotive supplier, just had one comprehensive corporate restructuring announced. Construction, reorientation, securing the future – wanted with it Conti shine. “With the new holding structure, we are ensuring that the decisions are delegated out of the central office, better even two stages. We… Continue reading Second profit warning: Continental loses the confidence of investors

LG Chem Secures More Materials For Future Battery Production

35 M BY VANJA KLJAIC The South Korean company will increase cell manufacturing capacity to 90 GWh in 2020 from a previous forecast of 70 GWh The battery business is set to become one of the foundations for the automotive industry in the forthcoming years. With so many new plug-in hybrid and fully electric vehicles slated… Continue reading LG Chem Secures More Materials For Future Battery Production

US carmakers must win in China, but it's going to get more difficult

US carmakers must win in China, but it's going to get more difficultThe fortunes of Detroit automakers increasingly lie some 7,000 miles to the east — in China.
China is already the world's largest car market, selling 29 million light vehicles a year. By 2025, China's new car sales will be double those of the United States, analysts said. To put that in perspective, about 17.2 million new light vehicles were sold last year in the U.S., according to Kelley Blue Book data.
And while new car sales are ballooning in China, they have leveled in the U.S.
This puts Detroit's car companies at a critical juncture. They must focus on growing their sales in China if they want to sustain total profits enough to succeed elsewhere in the world.
Yet Ford and Fiat Chrysler struggled in China in the second quarter, and it isn't getting any easier in the future for them and General Motors.
“It's going to get more and more difficult to compete in China,” said John Bonnell, senior adviser of ZoZo Go, an investment advisory firm specializing in China's electric and autonomous vehicle industries. “With the heavy competition, demand for more electric vehicles, trade wars … it's not an easy business there.”
Also on Freep.com:
U.S. automaker see profits dip, predict pitfalls
Ford profit drops $1B due to China, tariffs
Detroit's reality checkThe Chinese car market is intensely competitive given the rising success of some Chinese car companies in the last few years. Then there is the looming threat of President Donald Trump's proposed 25 percent tariffs on imported cars and parts, which could inflate prices across the board.
But carmakers that succeed in China will gain a big advantage in other markets, said Bonnell.
“It will impact their performance here, eventually,” said Bonnell. “If you just have the U.S., you wouldn't have those million-dollar sales to spread to your tooling costs” and to cover other research and development expenses.
In fact, said Bonnell, looking at Volkswagen's success in China, “Its market share in Europe, since they have succeeded in China, has gone straight up.”
But the Chinese consumer has distinct needs and requires products tailored to them, said Jeremy Acevedo, manager of data strategy with Edmunds. Therefore, product becomes king if Detroit carmakers are to attract new buyers there. “They can't rely on shopper loyalty in the booming Chinese auto market,” said Acevedo.
As for Trump's proposed tariff hike and retaliation by the Chinese, Detroit Three exports to China are not a factor because they account for less than 5 percent of sales, Michael Dunne, CEO of ZoZo Go, wrote in a newsletter.
“But if tensions escalate, Chinese leaders could steer consumers away from American-brand cars,” wrote Dunne.
He noted Chinese leaders did just that in the past with Korean and Japanese cars to “great effect” when political relations soured.
“So, a reality check is in order,” said Dunne. “Intensifying competition from Chinese automakers, plus a dose of acute consumer nationalism, could spell the beginning of the end of Detroit in China.”
China salesBesides fierce competition in China — about 110 car brands are sold in China, 60 of which are Chinese — the Chinese government is also pushing automakers for more electric vehicle production by 2020, said Bonnell. It has set strict regulations around EVs, he said.
As Ford and FCA try to compete, they are already behind the curve. Through June, Ford had sold 313,000 vehicles, down 38 percent from the same period a year ago giving it a 2 percent market share in China, said Bonnell, who references data from LMC Automotive.
In that same period, FCA's Jeep brand was down 34 percent to 115,000 units. It sells such a small number of vehicles, though, that FCA's market share is negligible, said Bonnell.
For GM, through June, sales of its Buick, Chevrolet, Cadillac brands were 960,000, up 10 percent from the same period a year ago. Including GM's minority share in SAIC GM Wuling, GM's sales through June totaled 2 million, up 7 percent from the same year ago period, said Bonnell.
GM President Dan Ammann told Wall Street analysts Thursday that GM is successful in China because it has invested in the product and the dealer network there for many years.
But the market in China has been intensely competitive, Ammann said. GM continues to invest in its business there and, “Make sure we’re prepared for the next phase of the market there” as it pushes for more electric vehicles and strict emissions.
The strongest non-Chinese automaker is Volkswagen, which has seen consistent growth in China.
“They were the first one to set up in the mid-'80s and they have strong partners and worked hard to get their brand established and dealer network established,” said Bonnell. “Being the first mover offered a big advantage for them.”
Volkswagen had sold 2.1 million cars through June in China, up 7 percent from the year-ago period, he said.
Ford's problemsFord China has struggled with an aging product portfolio and a thin, unprofitable dealer network. In the second quarter, it lost $483 million, a decline of $506 million from last year, Ford's CFO Bob Shanks said in a call with analysts.
Current products in the showroom are dated. Five new models, arriving this autumn, should help, but there is a lot of lost ground to make up. Ford China sales this year could fall 25 percent below their 2016 peak of 1.2 million. That's a 300,000-vehicle hole to dig out of, Shanks said.
Shanks blamed unfavorable market factors for Ford and Lincoln imports into China, and lower net pricing, some of which is related to tariff changes.
But Ford's Jim Farley said the deterioration of Ford's business in China has been swift.
“I can assure you, we understand the importance of getting our China business back on track,” Farley, Ford's executive vice president and president of Global Markets, told analysts.
Ford will launch a new, low-priced, midsize sport utility vehicle called Territory in China early next year, Farley said. The SUV will be built in China and was developed strictly for that market. It will give Ford a better chance to compete against lower priced vehicles than it had in the past there, said Farley.
Ford combats China struggles with low-cost SUV
Ford has serious shortfalls in its go-to-market capabilities, “including inadequate dealer profitability, excess stock including our high-volume (compact) cars,” Farley said. “We haven't maintained a fresh enough product lineup for this rapidly changing and dynamic China market.”
Those missteps along with an uncompetitive cost structure hurt Ford China, and Farley said Ford is taking “urgent action.”
By the end of next year, 60 percent of Ford China's vehicle lineup will be refreshed or new, said Farley. He said Ford is improving its competitiveness with aggressive cost cuts and more localized product such as the Explorer.
“We're close to hiring a new CEO for Ford China and we have already onboarded a number of local Chinese talent in key management positions such as marketing and sales leads for both Ford and Lincoln to drive not only our strategy but they're already reinvigorating our sales,” said Farley.
But until all of Ford's SUVs are launched in China, he warned, “We'll continue to face this mix deficit.”
GM's successFord's new products will be competing against several new products from GM China, which already has a strong foothold in the market.
In the second half of the year, GM China will introduce 10 new models including the Cadillac XT4 small SUV.
“The focus is on high-demand segments including SUVs and multipurpose vehicles and luxury vehicles,” GM CEO Mary Barra said in an analyst call.
GM China reported record results in the second quarter with equity income of $600 million, up $100 million year-over-year. The bulk of those sales are from Baojun, Cadillac and Chevrolet, and GM said it had a “continued focus on cost efficiencies” there.
GM will incur higher costs in the second half because of the cost to launch new vehicles. With competitors launching new vehicles, pricing will come under pressure too, she said.
“But we remain confident in our 20 years of market strength in China,” said Barra. “Due to established local and U.S. brands and our strong Chinese partner, our current outlook does not assume any comprehensive impact in China beyond existing trade flows.”
Still, GM's growth is driven by the affordable Baojun (pronounced bow joon) brand and the surging Cadillac brand. Buick and Chevrolet are “crimped at the edges and stalling,” wrote Dunne.
Baojun is GM's ultrasubcompact that costs less than $15,000. It will account for one in every four GM China sales this year, said Dunne.
But Dunne wrote that the “squeeze on Chevy and Buick reveals a larger, deeper threat to the Detroit Three in China.” Consumers there are much less attracted to mass market global brands than they were a few years ago. Instead, they are switching to Chinese brands such as Great Wall, BYD and Geely, wrote Dunne.
Geely is China's largest private automaker. It will sell almost twice as many cars in China as FCA and Ford combined this year, said Dunne.
FCA's futureIn Fiat Chrysler's second-quarter earnings call, CEO Mike Manley acknowledged that “the biggest challenges we face, and frankly we're going to continue to face to some extent for the balance of the year, are all focused in China.”
Changes in the tariff drove down sales of Maserati cars and shipments to dealers, Manley said. But he was quick to add, “With all of these duty changes behind us, I'm clearly expecting improved sales performance,” Manley said.
That's provided that FCA manages inventory to meet demand ahead of the transition to China's tougher emission regulations, he said. FCA has lowered its expected..