Tesla eliminates annual service, keeps some periodic maintenance

2019 Tesla Model 3 Performance
Electric cars are supposed to be more reliable than internal combustion models. Certainly, they have a lot fewer moving parts and need a lot less lubrication.

Yet Tesla, like most corner auto dealerships, has made money selling extended service plans for annual maintenance on its cars, sometimes mandatory.

With hundreds of thousands more Teslas hitting the road, all those service visits—along with repair work—have reportedly backed up the company's service centers. Now the company has reportedly put an end to those extended service plans and is hoping instead to highlight electric cars' inherent reliability—and hopefully reduce the wait times at those service centers.

DON'T MISS: Tesla aims to make service quicker, roadside assistance automatic

In an earnings call in January, Tesla CEO Elon Musk said improving service is one of his main priorities for 2019. He later made another change to eliminate parts distribution centers and stock common Tesla repair parts, including some body-repair panels, at the service centers themselves.

Tesla hasn't revealed what percentage of its service-center visits are for annual maintenance versus repairs. The annual maintenance schedule covers things like the cabin air filter (or HEPA filter, in the case of cars that include Tesla's Bioweapons Defense Mode), replacement of air-conditioner desiccant, tire rotation and wheel alignment, and brake fluid tests every two years, since the hydraulic brakes don't get used as much in electric cars and the hygroscopic brake fluid (which attracts water) tends to sit still for too long in the brake lines where it can cause rust.

READ THIS: Tesla opens its first in-house body shops to reduce repair times

Tesla recommended the service every year or 12,500 miles for the Model S and Model X and every two years or 25,000 miles for the Model 3.

Now Tesla tells owners: “Your Tesla does not require annual maintenance and regular fluid changes,” and instead recommends only periodic, as-needed servicing of brake fluid, pads, and calipers, filters, and air conditioning.

CHECK OUT: Tesla Model S Service Contract: $600/Year, Or Warranty Voided (2012)

In independent reliability reports, such as those from Consumer Reports, electric car cars have proven to require vastly fewer repairs of critical systems such as their drivetrains—if not necessarily any better overall reliability based on body hardware and minor annoyances such as squeaks and rattles. These are the kinds of things that independent mechanics can mostly accomplish if they have access to the parts.

It remains to be seen whether eliminating annual service visits in favor of waiting for problems to crop up will improve or diminish either customer satisfaction or service-center wait times.

In the meantime, in Texas, which has banned Tesla from selling through stores in the state, the legislature has introduced a bill to ban the company from working on its cars at its service centers. So far, there's no indication how likely it is to pass.

Faraday Future gets new money from gaming company to build in China, and the US

Faraday Future FF91 prototype
The shame of Faraday Future's financial struggles is that it has what looks to be a viable new electric car, not just on paper, but ready to roll on the road—in prototype form—that may never actually make it to market.

On Sunday, the company revealed a new joint venture with a video-game company in China that could bring it $600 million to build a version of its FF91 in China.

The company will form a joint venture with The9, a Chinese video-game company that launched the first Chinese virtual currency and community in 1999 and once had the exclusive license to operate World of Warcraft in China. It trades on the NASDAQ stock exchange and is reportedly worth $100 million.

READ THIS: With cease-fire agreement, spark flickers toward Faraday's Future

The joint venture aims to produce a new model for the Chinese market based on the FF91, called the V9. The joint company plans to produce up to 300,000 V9s per year for the Chinese market.

In a statement released Sunday, Faraday Future said that The9 will initially invest $5 million, which Faraday Future will use to “overcome its short-term cash flow difficulties and support its ongoing equity financing efforts.”

The balance of the $600 million is dependent on meeting certain investment contingencies.

DON'T MISS: Faraday Future posts “For Sale” signs, as Evergrande backer announces first EV

The company also said the joint venture will help it get the FF91 into production in the U.S.

Faraday Future has a factory in California, where it planned to build the FF91, and had talent from Tesla, Apple, and quite a few automakers to develop the FF91, but it has laid off most of it staff after a funding dispute with its previous backer, Evergrande Health, a large, Hong Kong-based conglomerate intent on getting into the electric-car business. Evergrande also holds a majority stake in National Electric Vehicles Sweden, a Chinese company that builds electric versions of the last Saab 9-3 in China.

CHECK OUT: Faraday Future funder writes its own Saab story

That $2 billion funding deal fell apart in a volley of lawsuits when Faraday Future spent through the first round of funding building running production prototypes of the FF91. The lawsuits were later withdrawn as Evergrande agreed to let Faraday Future seek additional funding from other sources.

The company has since struggled to do so, and The9 represents its first new source of major funding since the $2 billion deal with Evergrande fell apart.

Chinese EV startup XPeng is at the center of major trade secret disputes with Apple and Tesla

Last summer, a former Apple employee was charged by the FBI for allegedly stealing trade secrets related to the company’s secretive self-driving car project. This week, Tesla sued a former employee for allegedly stealing trade secrets related to Autopilot. While they happened many months apart, both sets of allegations have something in common: the employees… Continue reading Chinese EV startup XPeng is at the center of major trade secret disputes with Apple and Tesla

Tesla Autopilot now gives red light warnings & right of way for lane changes

Tesla is continuing to improve Autopilot’s abilities in both documented and undocumented ways.  Just recently the system has gained two new capabilities: detecting stop lights and detecting lane change intention from other cars. Lane change detection In the last few weeks, some drivers have noticed that Autopilot seems to be detecting lane change intention from… Continue reading Tesla Autopilot now gives red light warnings & right of way for lane changes

760,000 Cars Are Compatible With CHAdeMO (1.3 Million Including Tesla)

2 H BY MARK KANE CHAdeMO still keeps a strong position, but changes are coming. CHAdeMO Association released interesting numbers on the CHAdeMO fast charging standard popularity, using EV-Volumes.com data. As it turns out, among about 5 million plug-in cars of any kind sold globally, two-thirds are BEVs and one third are PHEVs. 49% of… Continue reading 760,000 Cars Are Compatible With CHAdeMO (1.3 Million Including Tesla)

Tesla Accusing Ex-Employee Of Selling Self-Driving Technology To Chinese Rival

Tesla has been renowned as a pioneer in its field, creating incredible, more environmentally friendly cars that run without petroleum gas and working on technology that will one day mean cars will be able to completely drive themselves.

That technology has been improving drastically under the Tesla banner, but the brand has recently had some trouble with Chinese rival Xiaopeng Motors. The California-based company has accused a former employee, engineer Guangzhi Cao, of stealing their self-driving tech, the Autopilot source code, and selling it to the Chinese startup, according to a report by CNN.

The legal complaint filed by Tesla states that “Cao uploaded complete copies of the company’s self-driving source code to his personal Apple iCloud account.”

It is believed that he took a total of “300,000 files and directories” during his time working with Tesla.

But the lawsuit then explains that after Cao was given a job at Xiaopeng Motors, he suddenly deleted 120,000 of those files and even disconnected his Apple account from his work computer. He then proceeded to repeatedly log into his Tesla account and delete his browser history.

In the meantime, Xiaopeng Motors has denied any knowledge of such underhanded business regarding Cao, but state that it has launched an internal investigation within the company to determine if Tesla’s accusation is true.

“XMotors fully respects any third-party’s intellectual property rights and confidential information. The company has been complying and will comply [with] all applicable laws and regulations,” they said in a statement, according to a recent Reuters report.

Tesla’s claim goes back to January, shortly before Cao left Tesla for Xiaopeng officially.

Cao is one of four former employees who Tesla is going after in cases of intellectual property theft, according to the lawsuit filed on Wednesday. U.S. self-driving car startup Zoox Inc. is also part of the lawsuit for stealing “proprietary information and trade secrets for developing warehousing, logistics and inventory control operations.”

Tesla has been working on self-driving technology for a while now and has been testing it on the road already. But competition, particularly of the variety that could be promising the same product for a much lower price, could cause a serious problem for them in the long run.

As Reuters points out, Tesla has also started construction on a production factory in Shanghai, putting it in direct competition if the Xiaopeng Motors company has, in fact, gotten ahold of its coding technology.

SK Innovation Plans 100 GWh Of Battery Production Capacity

1 H BY MARK KANE Break even expected in 2021 SK Innovation has bold investment plans in new lithium-ion cell production capacity around the world. The output is set to increase from 5 GWh annually today, to 20 GWh annually by the end of 2019, to 40 GWh annually in 2020 and 100 GWh annually… Continue reading SK Innovation Plans 100 GWh Of Battery Production Capacity

Early Customer Basks In The Glow Of His New Tesla Solar Roof Tile Install

Invest
Electric Cars
Electric Car Benefits
Electric Car Sales
Solar Energy Rocks
RSS
Advertise
Privacy Policy

Clean Power

Published on March 21st, 2019 |

by Kyle Field

Early Customer Basks In The Glow Of His New Tesla Solar Roof Tile Install

Twitter
LinkedIn
Facebook

March 21st, 2019 by Kyle Field

Another Tesla Solar Roof Tile customer (Blu_Beauties on Instagram and YouTube) has taken to the interwebs to show off his new system, and it gives us a view of what an installed retrofit system looks like. To date, installations of the sexy new Tesla Solar Roof Tiles have only trickled out, but Tesla CEO Elon Musk said at the Model Y unveiling last week that, “this is definitely going to be the year of the Solar Roof and Powerwall.”

This particular customer was able to cram an 18.5kW Solar Roof Tile system onto his roof, which he will use to power his Tesla Model X P100D and his home. Excess daytime solar generation will be stored on site in his cluster of three Tesla Powerwall 2s, with a storage capacity of 13.5kWh each. The Powerwalls will then be able to provide backup power in the event of a grid outage as well as providing nighttime power to his home after the sun goes to sleep.

The new customer video highlights a retrofit install, where the existing roof is removed and a new Tesla Solar Roof Tile roof is installed in its place. The installation of a solar roof tile roof is more complex than a traditional roof, with the Solar Roof Tiles arriving on site in blocks of 8 or 12 tiles that are then physically installed on the roof and wired up in succession.

Being made from glass, the solar roof tiles definitely aren’t your average roof covering. They aim to make use of the existing expense and effort to install a traditional roof to lower the cost of going solar. Installing a solar roof tile roof also eliminates the need to create new holes in an existing roof to mount traditional solar panels to the roof, which can be the cause for roof leaks years after the installation of the solar system.

I have been working with Tesla for a few months now to see if we can squeeze our home rebuild into the Tesla Solar Roof Tile program. We are rebuilding our home from the ground up after losing it in the Thomas Fire in December of 2017 and Tesla has not officially opened up Solar Roof Tile installations to new construction, which has been the only sticking point, but I’m not giving up yet.

I was initially skeptical of the return on investment, but after getting a few real quotes for normal roof installations from contractors and adding traditional solar onto the price, Tesla’s Solar Roof Tiles turned out to be fairly competitive. Either way, keep your eyes peeled for more scoops on Tesla’s Solar Roof Tiles and what should be an exciting year for Solar at Tesla.

About the Author

Kyle Field I'm a tech geek passionately in search of actionable ways to reduce the negative impact my life has on the planet, save money and reduce stress. Live intentionally, make conscious decisions, love more, act responsibly, play. The more you know, the less you need. TSLA investor.

Back to Top ↑

Advertisement

Advertise with CleanTechnica to get your company in front of millions of monthly readers.

CleanTechnica Clothing & Cups

Top News On CleanTechnica

Join CleanTechnica Today!

Advertisement

Advertisement

Follow CleanTechnica Follow @cleantechnica

Our Electric Car Driver Report

Read & share our new report on “electric car drivers, what they desire, and what the demand.”

The EV Safety Advantage

Read & share our free report on EV safety, “The EV Safety Advantage.”
EV Charging Guidelines for Cities

Share our free report on EV charging guidelines for cities, “Electric Vehicle Charging Infrastructure: Guidelines For Cities.”

30 Electric Car Benefits

Our Electric Vehicle Reviews

Tesla News

Cleantech Press Releases

Congress, Listen Up: The Answer To Climate Change Is Blowin’ In The Wind

Cascadia CleanTech Accelerator Announces Grant Winners, Opening of 2019 Application Period

Carbon Clean 200: The Companies Leading us to a Clean Energy Future

38 Anti-Cleantech Myths

Wind & Solar Prices Beat Fossils

Cost of Solar Panels Collapses

© 2018 Sustainable Enterprises Media, Inc.

Invest
Electric Cars
Electric Car Benefits
Electric Car Sales
Solar Energy Rocks
RSS
Advertise
Privacy Policy

This site uses cookies: Find out more.Okay, thanks

Tesla Service Struggles To Keep Up With Sales Volume

Invest
Electric Cars
Electric Car Benefits
Electric Car Sales
Solar Energy Rocks
RSS
Advertise
Privacy Policy

Cars

Published on March 21st, 2019 |

by Chris Boylan

Tesla Service Struggles To Keep Up With Sales Volume

Twitter
LinkedIn
Facebook

March 21st, 2019 by Chris Boylan

While Tesla’s car production and sales volumes have grown at an unprecedented pace, the company continues to struggle with the challenges of servicing this massive influx of new customers. As the volume of cars delivered has grown, so have the complaints about long waits for scheduled service, extended delays in having even basic service jobs completed, and the inability to get replacement body and mechanical parts in a timely fashion. While electric vehicles typically require much less maintenance than ICE (internal combustion engine) vehicles, and many issues can be addressed via over-the-air software updates, there are times when physical service needs to be performed.

Last month, Consumer Reports dropped the Model 3 from its recommended vehicles list due to owner reports about reliability, and yet the publication also reports that Tesla is the top brand in terms of overall owner satisfaction. Why the dichotomy?

“In most cases, reliability issues will undermine satisfaction,” says Jake Fisher, senior director of auto testing at Consumer Reports. “But when a vehicle has an enthusiastic following, like with Tesla, owners may overlook some issues.”

But just how much leeway will customers — particular customers who are new to the brand — give the company if their service experiences are below par?

This year’s Bernstein survey of Tesla owners exposes a troubling trend. While 87% of Tesla owners who responded to the survey said they “love their Tesla” (up 2% from last year), only 42% of respondents rated their Tesla service experience as “excellent” — a 15% drop from last year. Long wait times for appointments and poorer rates of problem resolution were cited as the most common issues related to poor marks.

Too Many Cars, Not Enough Parts
As a Model 3 owner, I’ve suffered with my own service issues and extended loss of use due to parts delays. A little fender dent on my Model 3 last spring led to the loss of my car for over a month. There’s currently only one Tesla authorized body shop in New York City, and they can only turn cars around as quickly as they can get the parts and do the work. More recently, I had to have the trunk lid replaced on my Model 3 Performance, and that led to another six weeks in the body shop. Again, the delay was blamed on inability to get replacement body parts: a simple trunk lid. And when the trunk lid finally arrived, the existing license plate mount wouldn’t fit on it. Apparently, Tesla made a running change to this part. So, for now, the shop has taped the license plate right onto the trunk using double-sided tape while waiting for the new mount to arrive.

Other Tesla owners have had it far worse. “We had one Tesla Model X in last year. The car had been struck in a front-end collision, causing damage to the steering link,” a service tech (who preferred to remain anonymous) told me recently. “We had that Model X up on the lift for well over two months while waiting for the necessary parts from Tesla, and this is a car that was only a few years old.”

Accidents happen. And when they do, a reliable supply of body parts is necessary. In this pic, a Tesla sits on a lift while getting some major surgery.

Good Service? Bad Service? It Depends Where You Live
As for the traditional service experience, results seem to vary significantly, depending on the customer’s location. “Service has been excellent in recent months. I brought my Model X to Rocklin (CA) for an airbag warning message and it was fixed in about 2 hours. Loaner cars have been plentiful. Mobile service has also been great. Have used them several times recently,” says Matthew Chan from Davis, California. Tomas in Chicago has also had good luck. “Just today, in advance of next week’s service visit, a tech reviewed my logs, did remote diagnostics, determined a fix in a specific coming software release, and saved me a service visit. They also gave me a personal phone number and email in case I want to check back. This is typical of the excellent service I’ve had since 2012.”

Rajinder S., from San Jose, California, has had mixed results, depending on which service center he visits. “San Jose has the best Tesla service center! They go well beyond what is expected, addressing issues other service centers could not. I had previously gone to Fremont and Sunnyvale Service Centers and had horrible experiences: my brand new Model S with 100 miles on it was at those two centers for two months; they just couldn’t get it right. More than that, communication was horrible. But the techs and service staff at San Jose are great. They fixed an issue with my Model 3 driver’s seat in about 45 minutes.”

Living in Ithaca, NY, Nathanael Nerode has also had mixed results. A Tesla owner since 2013, Mr. Nerode would have to drive five hours to get to his nearest Tesla service center. Fortunately, Nerode purchased an “unlimited” Ranger Service plan (which is no longer offered) when he bought his first Tesla. With the Ranger service, Tesla techs come to you to perform any necessary service. But even that is no magic bullet. “Until recently, service communications have been appalling. I’ve spent hours on the phone having to repeat my story to each new person. And then when the tech arrives, I have to explain it all over again. But those techs that do arrive have been great, at least for hardware issues. Every time I’ve had a hardware problem, it has been fixed permanently with an upgraded, improved hardware component. But software issues are a different story.”

Tesla’s Ranger service will come to your home or place of business to perform routine maintenance or repairs.

According to Nerode, Tesla’s integrated media player — the software used to play digital music from a USB thumb drive — leaves a lot to be desired. There’s a 92-page discussion about this on the Tesla Motors Club forum. After two and a half years, things have only gotten worse. Not better. Nerode has tried everything he can to get these software bugs fixed, including “executive escalation” … twice. But these requests appear to be falling on deaf ears. I, myself, have noted multiple audio glitches when listening to streaming media on my Model 3. I had been hoping that a software upgrade would make things better, but the glitches remain a year after my initial purchase.

“If something ‘non-critical’ is broken in software, you are screwed,” says Nerode. “They never fix software bugs. They just break stuff in the new releases. I would consider switching from the USB player to Bluetooth, but Tesla is still using a lower quality ancient version of Bluetooth that really isn’t conducive to music playback.”

My own experience at the Brooklyn, NY, service center has been less than positive. My first Tesla Model 3 needed to have its touchscreen replaced. It had been randomly responding to phantom touches, which caused the navigation system to shut itself off repeatedly and the audio system volume to randomly turn itself up or down. On one occasion, this happened while I was double-parked and out of the vehicle, causing permanent damage to the sound system. Replacing the screen only took about a week, as the service center was able to source the part locally. But the service rep said they were unable to reproduce the audio problem, so they didn’t repair it. Meanwhile, I experienced the issue again 10 minutes after leaving. I did not return to have the issue addressed, as this particular service center is inconvenient for me to get to. I just lived with the low-quality audio until I traded the Model 3 Rear Wheel Drive in for a Model 3 Performance.

That Model 3 Performance has had its own issues. While in Autopilot mode, the car won’t reliably change lanes. Sometimes, when I signal to the right, the car begins the lane change, then goes back into its original lane. After that stutter, the car sometimes stays in its original lane or it tries again and completes the lane change via a second attempt. Not only does this make me look to other drivers like a drunken fool, it also sort of undermines my faith in the Autopilot system. During a recent long-distance trip, I saw this failed lane change happen for about a third of the attempted lane changes, but only when changing lanes to the right, never to the left. I captured a couple of these failed lane change attempts via the built-in dash cam, and noted the date/time of the occurrences. You can see what this looks like in the video below.

Also, when I was negotiating out of a really tight parking space, I struck a 1-foot-wide pole in reverse with my Model 3 at very low speed. I thought it looked a bit close, but the proximity sensor said I was still at least 12 inches away. My mistake: I trusted the sensor instead of my eyes. I had hoped that the service center would find some flaw in the hardware and/or software, that they would repair the damage and the sensors and I’d be back up and running quickly. But this was not the case.

Need Tesla service in Paramus, NJ? Better be patient. On March 7th, the earliest availability for a service appointment there was nearly two months out, on May 2nd.

The earliest appointment I could get for the Tesla service center in Brooklyn to see the car was more than two weeks out. Checking online now, some of the service centers in the New York City area now have over a two month delay in scheduling basic service. The service center had the car for about 4 or 5 days, said that it found no fault in the proximity sensors (“working normally”) and that it could not reproduce the Autopilot lane change problem. So, they asked me to come and pick up the car immediately. I suggested that they try again to reproduce the lane change problem, as..