GM says it plans to relocate 1,100 factory workers

Cole Burston | Bloomberg | Getty Images
A General Motors Co. worker attends an information meeting at Unifor Union Hall in Oshawa, Ontario, Canada, on Monday, Nov. 26, 2018.

More than 1,100 General Motors employees have already volunteered to transfer from plants where the automaker is cutting jobs to other GM factories, the company said Friday.

GM has about 2,700 job openings at U.S. manufacturing plants in several states, including Michigan and Ohio, the company said. It will also be providing training and tuition assistance for affected employees as part of its plan to cut roughly 14,000 North American jobs, GM said.

“Strong U.S. and Canadian economies enable us to provide these opportunities now as we position General Motors for long-term success,” GM Chairman and CEO Mary Barra said in a statement. “Our focus remains on providing interested employees options to transition including job opportunities at other GM plants. We remain committed to working with local government officials, our unions and each individual to find appropriate opportunities for them.”

The news comes as GM files layoff notices with federal regulators. GM recently said it will cut up to 14,000 salaried and hourly jobs at facilities across the U.S. and Canada. The decision was viewed by some in the industry as a necessary step for GM to stay competitive in the short term and make investments to grapple with disruptive businesses and technologies such as ride sharing and automated driving technologies. However the move has also drawn criticism, particularly from labor leaders, politicians in the affected regions, and President Donald Trump.

The story is breaking news. Please check back for updates.

WATCH: Local governments are offering millions for Amazon's HQ2, but it may be a bad deal

Local governments are offering millions for Amazon's HQ2, but it may be a bad deal
4:04 PM ET Thu, 25 Oct 2018 | 06:59

Trump says ‘GM is not going to be treated well’

Andrew Harrer | Bloomberg | Getty Images
President Donald Trump, left, listens during a Strategic and Policy Forum meeting with business leaders and White House advisors in the State Dining Room of the White House in Washington, D.C., U.S., on Friday, Feb. 3, 2017.

President Donald Trump criticized job cuts at General Motors as well as CEO Mary Barra again Thursday, saying the U.S. automaker isn't “going to be treated well.”

“I don't like what she did, it was nasty,” Trump said on Fox News.

The recent decision by the largest U.S. automaker to cut up to 14,000 jobs that span three states has brought the company controversy with lawmakers from the affected areas and drawn the president's ire.

Trump: General Motors won't be treated well
3 Hours Ago | 04:07

“To tell me a couple of weeks before Christmas that she's going to close in Ohio and Michigan, not acceptable to me,” Trump said Thursday on Fox News. “General Motors is not going to be treated well.”

Trump also criticized GM's use of Mexican labor and said the recently signed United States-Mexico-Canada Agreement that replaces the North American Free Trade Agreement “really makes it uncomfortable for people to go out of the country, and I think it will be very uncomfortable for them.”

Trump is not the only U.S. politician who has been critical of the decision. Barra met with lawmakers from Ohio, Michigan and Maryland last week over the automaker's plans. Since then, Democratic Sen. Sherrod Brown and Republican Sen. Rob Portman, both from Ohio, sent a letter to Barra seeking more information about the company's plans for its assembly plant in Lordstown, Ohio, and asking Barra to consider retooling the plant for more popular vehicles.

“As we previously stated, our focus remains on our employees currently working at the impacted plants in Maryland, Michigan and Ohio,” GM said in a statement. “Our announcement was timed to enable interested employees job opportunities that are available at other GM plants beginning in early 2019.”

Mark Fields, Ford's former CEO, said GM is doing what's right for the business and investors, but closing factories always draws attention.

“Any time you close a plant or idle a plant around the world, you are going to get attention from the government because it's so important to the economy and jobs,” he said on CNBC's “Closing Bell.” “When you take these kind of actions, you need to make sure that you are doing it in a way that allows you to tell what the story is and at the same time make sure you have a narrative around why it's good for the business over the medium to long term, why you have to take these short-term painful actions.”

GM's shares closed down 1.6 percent Thursday.

China auto sales keep falling and falling

Fred Dufour | AFP | Getty Images
Vehicles at a Hongqi car dealer in Beijing. – Car sales are falling in China this year but one brand is speeding ahead: The national 'Red Flag' sedan is flying high, powered by purchases from the government, state companies and patriotic citizens.

Auto sales in China fell 14 percent in November over the same month in 2017, the Chinese Association of Automobile Manufacturers said Tuesday.

Sales fell 14 percent compared with November 2017, continuing a downward trend that started in July. It is the largest decline so far this year, the association said in a press release.

“This is the first sustained downturn in memory,” said Michael Dunne, CEO of ZoZoGo, a firm that advises automakers on doing business in China. “We would have to go back to the Asian financial crisis in 1998-1999 to see the last time China had flat or down sales for four months or more in a row.”

A slowing economy, a crackdown on certain types of auto lending and a trade war with the United States have all been factors in contributing to the slowdown, Dunne said.

There were a couple of bright spots though. Heavy truck sales rose last month, which was surprising, Piper Jaffray analyst Alexander Potter said in a note published Tuesday. The growth came primarily from a jump in the sale of semi-trucks, which outsold construction trucks for the first time in more than a year.

Soul-searching is in order for Nissan’s board after Ghosn allegations, governance experts say

Takashi Aoyama | Getty Images News | Getty Images
A general view of Nissan Crossing showroom in the Ginza district on November 21, 2018 in Tokyo, Japan.

Turmoil at Japan's Nissan Motor surrounding allegations of impropriety by ousted chairman Carlos Ghosn raises questions about the oversight role of the company's board of directors, corporate governance experts said this week.

Ghosn, long seen as a superstar of the global auto industry, was arrested last month after allegedly under reporting compensation and misusing assets.

He gained renown for reviving Nissan after French automaker Renault took a large stake in the company nearly two decades ago. He later went on to oversee an alliance involving Renault, Nissan and Mitsubishi Motors.

But Ghosn was dumped by the boards of Nissan and Mitsubishi after his arrest on Nov. 19, though is still chairman and CEO of Renault. He remains in custody in Tokyo and has yet to be charged.

Japanese broadcaster NHK, citing unnamed sources, reported last month that Ghosn has denied under reporting his earnings.

Jamie Allen, secretary general of the Asian Corporate Governance Association, said that a key concern about the allegations against Ghosn is why Nissan's board of directors was seemingly unaware.

“I think there is a clear issue of internal controls in that company that they're not properly addressing,” Allen told reporters in Hong Kong on Wednesday.

“If the board really didn't know about that, and maybe they really didn't know about that, then that doesn't speak … very highly of their internal controls, or their governance,” Allen said. “My point is boards have collective responsibility … so I think the board at Nissan really needs to do some soul-searching.”

Other experts also questioned the role of oversight at Nissan.

“I think it is extremely unlikely that the board did not know about this,” Jesper Koll, head of Japan at WisdomTree Investments, told CNBC on Friday.

“Because the reality is any board, whether it is a purely local Japanese company or whether it is an international, global company, whatever corporation you run, the executive compensation and CEO compensation is an extremely important issue,” Koll said.

John Buchanan, an expert in Japanese corporate governance at the Centre for Business Research at Cambridge Judge Business School, said that a lack of formal charges against Ghosn makes it difficult to assess the board's role, though he added it was unlikely to have been completely in the dark regarding remuneration.

And Nissan's decision to “disgrace the company by calling in public prosecutors” resulted in “effectively advertising the inadequacy of the board and Nissan's internal controls,” Buchanan said in an email.

“This can be seen as a demonstration that Japanese corporate governance is still largely internally focused,” he said.

'Foreign majority shareholders'

Contacted by CNBC for comment, Nick Maxfield, a spokesman for Nissan, which is headquartered in Yokohama, Japan, said by email that the company went to Japanese prosecutors with results of an internal probe spurred by a whistleblower that had “uncovered substantial evidence” of alleged under reporting of compensation and misuse of assets and funds.

Maxfield, who said Nissan could not disclose specifics of the probe, referred to comments made by Nissan CEO Hiroto Saikawa at a press conference the day Ghosn was arrested.

Saikawa had said Nissan would need to “identify the issues of governance (and) really look back on what happened seriously and take immediate and fundamental countermeasures” because the alleged misconduct had been lengthy.

Maxfield also said that Nissan's board on Nov. 22 vowed to create a special committee to receive advice from an independent third party on governance and managing compensation.

A team of Jefferies analysts suggested in a report last month that foreign shareholders — who, by their calculation, hold more than 80 percent of Nissan's stock — also cannot shirk responsibility.

“If Nissan was badly governed, then the blame should rest squarely on the shoulders of its foreign majority shareholders,” the report said.

Renault has the largest single stake in Nissan at more than 40 percent.

The European automaker did not immediately respond to a request by email for comment from CNBC.

Some experts also cautioned against reading too much into Nissan's problems and losing sight of positive changes that have taken place in broader Japanese corporate governance in recent years, such as greater power for whistle-blowers — a key element of the Nissan case — and a new ombudsman clause.

“That actually shows, I think, that corporate governance in terms of the structure that is being put into place is actually looking to improve,” WisdomTree's Koll said.

Ulrike Schaede, professor of Japanese Business at the University of California San Diego, agreed that the overall situation has improved, but stressed that corporate abuses will occur even with the best of safeguards.

“If a CEO wants to do something that benefits him or her more than the company, they will be able to do it no matter what the governance system does,” Schaede said.

“It happens in all systems,” she added. “So in that sense I don't think that this is indicative of a system failure in Japan.”

Ford and VW considering an expansive alliance likely to echo across the global auto industry

David Becker | Getty Images
Volkswagen Passenger Cars CEO Dr. Herbert Diess speaks at CES 2016 next to the Budd-e electric van.

Barring a last-minute hitch, two of the world's largest automakers plan to announce a far-reaching alliance shortly after the new year, one that will cover a wide swath of territory and a broad range of technologies, new and old.

The deal will serve as something of a jointly played jigsaw puzzle, allowing Ford Motor and Volkswagen to leverage their strengths and offset weaknesses at a time when the global automotive industry is facing not only traditional competitive challenges but the risks posed by massive technological transformation. Among the key elements expected to be part of the deal will be a cooperative effort to bring to market electrified and autonomous vehicles, something each of the companies already has spent billions of dollars developing.

“We are in quite advanced negotiations and dialog with Ford to really build up a global automotive alliance, which also would strengthen the American automotive industry,” Volkswagen CEO Herbert Diess told reporters in Washington, D.C. after meeting with President Donald Trump earlier this week, offering the most substantial comment on the carmakers' negotiations yet.

The meeting, which included other European auto executives such as Daimler CEO Dieter Zetsche, was aimed at easing trade tensions that have seen Trump threaten to impose major new tariffs aimed at restricting access to the American market by European automakers.

Diess noted that he had told the president VW is”considering building a second car plant” that would supplement the automaker's existing facility in Chattanooga, Tennessee that has already doubled in size since opening in 2011.

But there appear to be other options Volkswagen is considering as it moves forward with talks with Ford. That includes the possibility of taking over one of the American company's existing, underutilized assembly plants. It is also possible, several sources close to the talks have hinted, that VW could wind up sharing more than one plant with Ford.

Far-reaching options

The two have been talking for the better part of a year. Confirming widespread rumors, they formally signed a memorandum of understanding last June that focused on efforts to jointly develop and assemble commercial vehicles.

“Ford is committed to improving our fitness as a business and leveraging adaptive business models — which include working with partners to improve our effectiveness and efficiency,” Jim Farley, Ford's president of global markets, said at the time.

But Farley offered a clear hint that there could be more to come when he noted, “We look forward to exploring with the Volkswagen team in the days ahead how we might work together to better serve the evolving needs of commercial vehicle customers — and much more.”

Patrick T. Fallon | Bloomberg | Getty Images
Jim Farley

How much more is now the central question, but in conversations with senior Ford and VW executives they do little to hide the likelihood that the answer will be “lots.” About the only thing off the table, said an executive with frequent C-suite access, is any sort of cross-equity swap.

Along with the possible collaborations on vans and other commercial vehicles, the talks now have expanded to include:

The sharing of assembly plants in the U.S. and other markets;The possibility of combining marketing and distribution operations that would leverage each company's strengths. Ford could play lead in the U.S., for one thing, while VW would be dominant in Europe and China, both markets where the American carmaker is struggling;They may work jointly on products in other segments. While VW has been struggling to expand its presence in the booming light truck market, that's one of Ford's real strengths;Perhaps the most far-reaching collaboration would see Ford and Volkswagen partner up on the development of autonomous and electrified vehicles.

Right now, autonomous and fully driverless vehicles remain largely the stuff of science fiction but the technology is expected to begin playing a major role in the transportation world within a decade. A study released late in 2017 by the Boston Consulting Group forecast nearly a third of the miles Americans clock on the road each year could be in fully driverless vehicles operated by ride-sharing services such as Lyft and Uber by 2030.

Those vehicles are also expected to be powered by electric drivetrains. Collectively, hybrids, plug-ins and pure battery-electric vehicles captured barely 4 percent of the U.S. market in 2017, but that has begun to surge, particularly in China, which has enacted strict new regulations promoting zero-emissions vehicles.

Ford's focus on new technology is underscored by its repositioning as a “mobility company,” rather than an automotive manufacturer. The Dearborn, Michigan-based company was an early player in electrification but is playing catch-up now when it comes to longer-range models capable of challenging the likes of Tesla. Volkswagen, however, is going flat out.

Its Audi brand recently debuted the e-tron SUV that will be the automaker's first Tesla fighter. A second all-electric Audi, the e-tron GT debuted at this month's Los Angeles Auto Show. The all-electric Porsche Taycan follows next year, as does the first long-range battery electric vehicle (BEV) under the new sub-brand Volkswagen I.D. The second I.D. model, reports Reuters, will start as low as $23,000, sharply undercutting the Tesla Model 3. There's an all-electric reincarnation of the legendary VW Microbus, to be called the I.D. Buzz, coming, as well. All-told, the dozen VW retail brands will have close to 50 battery-electric vehicles by mid-decade.

Source: Audi
Audi E-Tron

In the wake of its embarrassing diesel emissions scandal — which cost VW about $30 billion in the U.S. alone — the carmaker has become such a believer in electrification that it has indicated a new family of internal combustion engines will be the last developed specifically to run on gasoline or diesel, with the German manufacturer planning to go all-electric by 2030.

The cost is staggering, Diess recently announcing its commitment will cost at least $50 billion over the next decade. Pairing development efforts and parsing up costs could be one of the biggest payoffs from the planned alliance between Ford and VW, experts like David Cole, director-emeritus of the Center for Automotive Research, believe.

The same is the case with autonomous technology. Ford, for its part, has committed $4 billion to autonomous driving, including the $1 billion acquisition of Pittsburgh-based autonomous vehicle development company Argo AI. The U.S. automaker also plans to invest $740 million to transform the long-abandoned Michigan Central Depot — a symbol of Motor City blight — and other buildings nearby into the headquarters of its new subsidiary, Ford Autonomous Vehicles.

“A lot of these things are very long-term, 10, 15, 20 years away,” said Cole. “And the challenge is figuring out how to afford that in the near-term.”

Ford and VW are by no means the only ones looking for synergies that could overcome traditional rivalries. Two months ago, Honda signed on as a partner with General Motors' autonomous vehicle program, investing $750 million in its Cruise Automation subsidiary and committing to spend nearly $2 billion more over the next decade. The Japanese and American makers previously formed a joint venture aimed at the development and production of fuel-cell technology.

Risky ventures

Joint ventures and broader alliances can be risky, however, something GM found out when, in 2005, it tried to exit a dysfunctional relationship with Fiat. The divorce eventually cost it $2 billion. Now, there are growing concerns that the 20-year-old Renault-Nissan-Mitsubishi Alliance could be coming undone following the arrest last month of Carlos Ghosn, the man who initially put it together.

Volkswagen and Ford also know how fragile relationships can be. Four decades ago they combined their operations in South America's two largest markets, Brazil and Argentina. The joint venture helped them weather a long economic slump but, as the regional economy recovered during the mid-1980s, VW decided to exit Autolatina and go it alone. Because of the way the market had shifted, however, it left Ford in a weakened position that it has never fully recovered from.

Several at Ford have said that there is still institutional memory of that soured relationship that, at the very least, is informing how the U.S. carmaker approaches negotiations with its erstwhile ally.

But the many potential benefits have the automakers plowing ahead. There had been some indication that a deal could be announced before the end of the year but, CNBC was advised by a highly placed source at one of the carmakers, it now looks like it will take until sometime in January.

..

Tesla needs ‘seasoned’ operator to take on execution hurdles: Analyst

Tesla still has execution hurtles, says expert
2 Hours Ago | 03:28

Tesla needs to consider adding a “really seasoned operator” to manage the mass-market manufacturer, Consumer Edge Research's James Albertine told CNBC on Friday.

“They need to prove that there's true independent, sort of, checks and balances between the board and senior management,” the senior analyst said on “Power Lunch.”

Albertine, who is equal weight on the stock, commended CEO Elon Musk for making his mark in the automotive industry with his electric car company. But Tesla needs a “different skill set” to build 500,000 units a year and expand into China, he contended.

“There are significant execution hurdles ahead,” Albertine added.

Musk's leadership skills have come into question ever since he started acting erratically months ago. Most notably, he found himself in trouble with the SEC when he tweeted about taking the company private. He also appeared to smoke pot on a podcast.

Albertine said Tesla has to continue to progress from its third-quarter earnings before he decides to upgrade to a buy rating. He will take into consideration who the company nominates to the board of directors.

“This is a long overdue sort of call here for more streamlined kind of focus on operations and kind of corporate governance from an independent board perspective,” he said.

On Friday, a Jefferies analyst raised Tesla's price target from $360 to $450, saying the company improved productivity.

Shares of the automotive company reached a turning point Thursday when they closed higher than the roughly $360 conversion price on the $920 million in convertible bonds due in March. It was the first time they closed above that price since early August when Musk floated the idea of taking the company he co-founded private.

The stock dipped 1.4 percent Friday to close at around $358.

Tesla did not immediately respond to a request for comment.

Disclaimer

Tesla General Counsel Todd Maron is leaving the company

Bobby Yip | Reuters
Tesla Chief Executive Elon Musk stands on the podium as he attends a forum on startups in Hong Kong, China.

Tesla announced on Friday that General Counsel Todd Maron is leaving the electric vehicle maker, the second high-ranking attorney to do so this quarter. Last month, Phil Rothenberg left his post as Tesla's Vice President of Legal, to become general counsel at Sonder, a hospitality start-up.

The Wall Street Journal reported news of Maron's departure, and Tesla acknowledged the personnel moves in a blog post following the report.

The electric car company said it plans to replace Maron with seasoned Beltway trial lawyer Dane Butswinkas, a chairman at Williams & Connolly, who was also a Co-Chair in the firm's Commercial Litigation, Financial Services and Banking Groups.

Butswinkas will report directly to CEO Elon Musk, and will oversee Tesla's legal and government relations teams, according to Tesla's statement.

Tesla specified, in their announcement, that Maron will stay on through January to ensure a smooth hand-off to his successor.

Maron's leaving Tesla comes as a surprise to many due to his longstanding relationship with Musk. He served as the billionaire's divorce attorney via a boutique family law firm, Jaffe and Clemens, prior to joining Tesla in 2013 as deputy counsel.

Tesla is currently facing a host of lawsuits and regulatory probes.

And the company is working to become compliant with terms of a settlement it struck earlier this year with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission, after Musk tweeted that he could take the company private at $420 a share. The settlement requires Tesla to employ an “experienced securities lawyer” to review social media communications by its senior officers, including Musk.

Fiat Chrysler plans to open factory in Detroit to build new three-row, Jeep Grand Cherokee: Sources

Rebecca Cook | Reuters
Fiat Chrysler Automobiles assembly workers build 2019 Ram pickup trucks at the FCA Sterling Heights Assembly Plant in Sterling Heights, Michigan, October 22, 2018.

Fiat Chrysler, riding a wave of strong truck and SUV sales, is planning to build a new final assembly plant in Detroit even as other American automakers scale back operations in the U.S., according to people familiar with the plan.

The assembly plant, an old Mack II Engine Plant that closed in 2012, will build a new three-row, Jeep Grand Cherokee SUV starting in 2020 as the automaker moves to keep up with strong demand for utility vehicles, the people said. A spokesperson for Fiat Chrysler would not comment on the report, nor confirm the automaker's plans.

The move comes as the industry faces pressure from President Donald Trump to keep manufacturing jobs in the U.S. and stands in stark contrast to the recent decision by General Motors to stop production and idle five plants in North America including four in the United States.

GM has come under fire after announcing last week that it plans to cut 14,000 jobs in the U.S. and Canada, citing a weakening economy, the escalating trade war and a desire to reposition itself as a smaller, more nimble company. Ford is also scaling back, saying last week that it planned to cut a shift at two of its U.S. plants in an attempt to avoid more onerous layoffs.

Detroit will lose two GM facilities altogether. Both were performing well under capacity and contributing to a dismal capacity utilization rate of just 76 percent across the United States, far below Fiat Chrysler's rate of 90 percent.

Fiat Chrysler's plants are running at close to capacity due to continued strong demand for trucks and SUV's. Overall, Fiat Chrysler's sales in the U.S. are up 8 percent this year, easily outpacing the industry less than one percent according to the market research firm Autodata.

All of Detroit's Big Three automakers are abandoning sedan lines in favor of more popular and profitable SUVs and cross-over vehicles.

Sales of SUVs and pickups have been one of Fiat Chrysler's biggest areas of growth and have kept it ahead of its U.S. rivals. Overall sales jumped 17 percent in November over the same month last year — fueled largely by its popular Jeep SUVs and Ram Trucks.

Ford's sales, by comparison, dropped by about 7 percent in the same period.

Jeep unveiled the Gladiator pickup truck at the LA Auto Show last week, inspired by its popular and iconic Wrangler off-road SUV.

Fiat Chrysler CEO Mike Manley ran both the Jeep and Ram brands for FCA before he replaced late former CEO Sergio Marchionne in July as Marchionne's health rapidly declined.