Excess plant capacity helps hasten GM cuts

Excess plant capacity helps hasten GM cutsGeneral Motors Co. and Ford Motor Co. both are cutting slow-selling sedans from their U.S. lineups, but only GM is threatening to close at least five plants here and in Canada to make it happen.
The difference lies, in part, in a wonkish industry term that means the difference between profit and loss, jobs or the road to unemployment in modern auto plants: “capacity utilization.” That's the percentage of a plant's maximum capacity being used to build vehicles. Break-even is considered 80 percent, and GM has a lot more U.S. plants running below that threshold than rivals Ford and Fiat Chrysler Automobiles.
Eight of 12 GM assembly plants in the U.S. were operating at 80 percent capacity or less this year, according to data from LMC Automotive. That's a stark contrast with crosstown rivals Ford and Fiat Chrysler Automobiles. Only three of Ford's nine U.S. assembly plants were running below 80 percent of capacity in 2018; two of Fiat Chrysler's six plants were below that same threshold.
“There's no question that when you look across the region, GM's (plant utilization) is behind both” Ford and Fiat Chrysler, said Jeff Schuster, an analyst with LMC Automotive. “We've been flagging that as a warning sign…They got caught with more of a car-capacity. Their scale led to this, and they also had too much on the car side.”
As a result, GM is forced to make painful moves to brace for an uncertain future. The automaker last week announced it would idle four U.S. facilities in 2019 as it gears up to spend billions preparing for the electric and autonomous vehicles of the future.
Ford and Fiat Chrysler also assemble more of their top-selling vehicles trucks and SUVs exclusively in the United States than GM, according to LMC data. GM's San Luis Potosi plant in Mexico that produces GM's second-best selling vehicle, the Equinox, has run at 91 percent capacity utilization this year; its Silao, Mexico, plant is running at 145 percent building the four-door Silverado and Sierra. Automakers can run above 100 percent capacity utilization by running extra shifts.
“Some of it is due to what the types of products in those plants are,” said Kristin Dziczek, vice president of the Ann Arbor-based Center for Automotive Research. “GM has a dedicated plant for Corvette…”
Ahead of the curve
Ford and Fiat Chrysler closed plants and cut UAW workers a decade ago, ahead of the recession. GM closed plants then, too.
But now, as U.S. vehicle sales flatten after an extended period of growth — and as U.S. consumers increasingly turn away from sedans — under-utilization of plants became a problem for GM. Some of the Detroit automaker's under-producing plants have been operating below 80 percent capacity since 2016.
Of the eight GM U.S. plants running at 80 percent or lower, six build sedans or compact cars. That wouldn't be a problem if GM was gearing up to build new SUVs or trucks in those facilities, experts said. But the automaker has yet to announce plans for such vehicles, leaving the plants “unallocated,” an industry term that essentially means a plant has no product to build — the first step toward closure.
“GM is spread out with more facilities,” said Dziczek. “Ford builds more of what it sells in the U.S. in the U.S.” That includes its best-selling F-Series pickups, all of which are built in the United States.
For now, that's keeping Ford and Fiat Chrysler safe from President Donald Trump's scrutiny. “They haven't been tweeted at, have they?” Dziczek asked.
GM CEO Mary Barra's austerity measures drew the ire of the president and other politicians, and left the United Auto Workers and hourly employees boiling. GM expects to cut 8,000 salaried positions by January — some 3,300 hourly employees are at risk due to the plant idlings tied to sedan cuts announced last week.
Preparing for future
GM says its restructuring actions are proactive steps to prepare for the future. It plans to idle four U.S. plants at the height of national contract negotiations next year with the UAW. And that would cut some of its money-losing sedans after the plants building the Buick Lacrosse, Cadillac CT6 and Chevrolet Impala and Volt stop production.
“We continuously look at our operations for opportunities to improve our efficiency and capacity utilization,” Kimberly Carpenter, head of GM labor communications, said in a statement. “We believe the recent actions move us in the right direction based on changing market conditions and customer preferences.”
Former Fiat Chrysler CEO Sergio Marchionne saw the sedan's decline coming more than three years ago. Fiat Chrysler in 2016 began expanding capacity for Jeeps and trucks after it decided to cut most of its sedans. Its plants are running so near capacity that the automaker has trouble shutting down facilities to retool for profitable new products.
Ford said in April it plans to drop five sedans by the beginning of the next decade. It already had plans to build SUVs and trucks in their place in the U.S.
Ford hasn't said officially how large its headcount reduction will be. Ford says the cuts it made a decade ago to its plants went deep enough. GM has argued it is trying to avoid those deep cuts this time with proactive measures like those announced a week ago.
Products, products, products
Product allocation is likely to take center stage in GM's negotiations with the UAW next year, as the union fights to keep plants open. Ford negotiated most of that during the last round of UAW negotiations in 2015, Ford officials said.
“Forecasting and planning made that happen,” Ford President of Global Operations Joe Hinrichs said. “It was really important that these manufacturing sites have the kind of utilization that we're talking about, because that's what protects the jobs. We do that by filling up the plants with products that people want.”
Ford's Michigan Assembly plant had a 25 percent utilization rate through November this year. In October, the Wayne plant began making the the 2019 Ranger — a product Ford says will sell better than the Focus and C-Max they'd been building there.
UAW Vice President Rory Gamble said in a statement Wednesday that a big part of the collective bargaining process is understanding plant utilization. The automakers and the UAW will begin to negotiate a new four-year contract in late 2019.
“A major part of collective bargaining is to pay attention to plant utilization and product footprint,” Gamble said. “This is a long-term process that involves strategic investment decisions by the company…”
Experts and officials told The News that no automaker plans for a plant to go down to one shift for any extended period of time. It demonstrates a flaw in product planning, though several factors could have held up GM's ability to better allocate products in the U.S., or close unnecessary plants sooner.
“There's skill and luck here,” LMC analyst Jeff Schuster said. “FCA made some of the tough decisions sooner, which at the time cost them volume. They made those decisions, and had the market not done what it has done since then, they might have been caught from a competitive standpoint. Call it foresight or luck or a combination of both, but from a management standpoint, they got there sooner.”
ithibodeau@detroitnews.com
Twitter: @Ian_Thibodeau
Detroit News staff writer Nora Naughton contributed
Read or Share this story: https://www.detroitnews.com/story/business/autos/general-motors/2018/12/06/excess-plant-capacity-hastens-gm-cuts/2162582002/

And Uber is going with . . . Bird (looks like)

Five months ago, the Bay Area-based electric scooter rental company Lime joined forces with the ride-hailing giant Uber, which both invested in the company as part of a $335 million round and said it was going to promote Lime in its mobile app. It’s looking now like that may have been a mistake for Lime. Though… Continue reading And Uber is going with . . . Bird (looks like)

Barra stands firm on GM austerity plans in DC meetings

Barra stands firm on GM austerity plans in DC meetingsWashington — General Motors Co. Chairman Mary Barra stood firm on plans to idle five plants, lay off 6,000 salaried employees and imperil the jobs of 3,300 hourly workers as she met Wednesday with Ohio's U.S. senators and several of Michigan's newly elected U.S. members.
Speaking with reporters after a closed-door meeting with Barra at the U.S. Capitol on Wednesday, Ohio Sens. Sherrod Brown and Rob Portman said the GM chief committed to trying to expedite negotiations with the United Auto Workers union on the future of the company's recented “unallocated” plants, including the Lordstown Assembly plant in northeast Ohio. But they said Barra did not reverse course on the decisions as they would have preferred.
“Both of us want to be sure that both the company and the UAW expedite that as much as possible and get to a decision to provide some potential certainty,” said Portman, a Republican. “She agreed that's a potential opportunity. Also, she has said to us that she is going to keep an open mind, but she does not want to raise expectations.”
Brown, a Democrat who is being mentioned as a potential presidential candidate, said of the Lordstown plant: “Are they going to bring an electric vehicle? Are they going to retool their plant and maybe look at one of their SUVs moving into this plant? They can do that. They've been the beneficiary of a tax bill that has produced some dollars for them to reinvest. Some of it is stock buybacks, but a lot of it can go to reinvesting in this plant.”
Lawmakers are furious at GM for moving to cease production next year at Lordstown, at its Detroit-Hamtramck and Warren Transmission plants in Michigan, at Oshawa Assembly in Ontario and at Baltimore Operations in Maryland. Work will stop next year at predetermined dates, but plants will not officially close. The future of those facilities will be determined during 2019 negotiations with the United Auto Workers union.
The company is planning to lay off nearly 6,000 salaried workers next year after a buyout program last month only had 2,250 takers, according to a memo sent to employees by CEO Mary Barra and obtained by The Detroit News. The salaried buyouts and the layoffs together will affect 8,000 North American employees and a number of global executives, none of whom are part of the senior leadership team.
Barra on Wednesday at the same press conference defended the decisions as a response to market conditions that have resulted of a shifting U.S. consumer preferences that have made sedans tough to sell.
“We are in an industry that is transforming faster than I've ever seen in my 38 year career,” she said. “What we are trying to is make sure that General Motors is strong and that we're in a leadership position with technologies like electrification and autonomous vehicles and connectivity, because that's what customers want. That's where industry is going.”
Barra deflected criticism of GM's decision that invokes the company's receipt of nearly $50 billion in federal assistance in the 2008 and 2009 auto bailouts, which the company notes has repaid.
“Since 2009, we have invested $22 billion in the United States, and in the last couple of years we've invested several more billions of dollars and we'll continue to do that,” Barra said.
“We will be forever grateful for the assistance that the U.S. government provided General Motors, and we're trying to make sure we're good corporate citizens and continue to provide jobs and and provide vehicles and transportation that consumers want in this country,” she continued. “That's what I think is the most responsible thing that we can do to thank the American taxpayers for what they did for us.”
Barra also met Wednesday with incoming U.S. representatives from Michigan. Rashida Tlaib, Haley Stevens, Elissa Slotkin and Andy Levin, all Democrat, will be in Boston for training and can't attend the Barra's meeting on Thursday with Michigan lawmakers in person. Michigan's congressional delegation will meet with her at 2 p.m.
Tlaib said in a statement after the meeting: “From the 1,300 homes, churches, and shops in Poletown that were seized and bulldozed to build the Detroit-Hamtramck plant, to the $51 billion public bailout that lost hardworking taxpayers more than $11 billion, we have paid a terribly steep price to placate and keep GM afloat.
“Now, as we fight to rebuild our regional economy and create living-wage jobs, GM is repaying our sacrifice and investment by slashing thousands of jobs and closing the plant an entire neighborhood was torn down to build,” Tlaib continued. “I’ll always stand in solidarity with workers and for what’s right and this is simply wrong. GM's announcement reaffirms my commitment to demanding binding community benefits agreements whenever a wealthy corporation is lining up for public subsidies.”
klaing@detroitnews.com
(202) 662-8735
Twitter: @Keith_Laing
Read or Share this story: https://www.detroitnews.com/story/business/autos/general-motors/2018/12/05/barra-stands-firm-gm-austerity-plans-dc/2217522002/

GM CEO will keep ‘open mind’ on plant closings, acknowledges anger

WASHINGTON (Reuters) – General Motors Co (GM.N) Chief Executive Mary Barra on Wednesday vowed to keep an “open mind” about the future of an Ohio plant that will lose vehicle production, but warned the Detroit automaker has excess capacity and did not suggest the company was reconsidering the plan. General Motors (GM) Chairman and CEO… Continue reading GM CEO will keep ‘open mind’ on plant closings, acknowledges anger

UPDATE 3-GM CEO will keep ‘open mind’ on plant closings, acknowledges anger

WASHINGTON (Reuters) – General Motors Co (GM.N) Chief Executive Mary Barra on Wednesday vowed to keep an “open mind” about the future of an Ohio plant that will lose vehicle production, but warned the Detroit automaker has excess capacity and did not suggest the company was reconsidering the plan. General Motors (GM) Chairman and CEO… Continue reading UPDATE 3-GM CEO will keep ‘open mind’ on plant closings, acknowledges anger

Ford’s Venezuela unit offers buyouts as output dwindles -sources

CARACAS (Reuters) – Ford Motor Co (F.N) is offering buy-outs to staff at its moribund plant in Venezuela to reduce its payroll, two union leaders said, as the U.S. automaker seeks to streamline its money-losing South America operations. FILE PHOTO: The corporate logo of Ford is seen on a billboard at the facilities of the… Continue reading Ford’s Venezuela unit offers buyouts as output dwindles -sources

Google’s robotic spinoff launches ride-hailing service

Google’s robotic spinoff launches ride-hailing serviceSan Francisco – Google’s self-driving car spinoff is finally ready to try to profit from its nearly decade-old technology.
Waymo is introducing a small-scale ride-hailing service in the Phoenix area that will include a human behind the wheel in case the robotic vehicles malfunction.
The service debuting Wednesday marks a significant milestone for Waymo, a company that began as a secretive project within Google in 2009. Since then, its cars have robotically logged more 10 million miles on public roads in 25 cities in California, Arizona, Washington, Michigan and Georgia while getting into only a few accidents – mostly fender benders.
The company is initially operating the new service cautiously, underscoring the challenges still facing its autonomous vehicles as they navigate around vehicles with human drivers that don’t always follow the same rules as robots.
The service, dubbed Waymo One, at first will only be available to a couple hundred riders, all of whom had already been participating in a free pilot program that began in April 2017. It will be confined to a roughly 100-square-mile area in and around Phoenix, including the neighboring cities of Chandler, Tempe, Mesa, and Gilbert.
Although Waymo has been driving passengers without any humans behind the wheel in its free pilot program, it decided to be less daring with the new commercial service.
“Self-driving technology is new to many, so we’re proceeding carefully with the comfort and convenience of our riders in mind,” Waymo CEO John Krafcik wrote in Wednesday blog post heralding the arrival of the new service.
The ride-hailing service is launching in the same area where a car using robotic technology from ride-hailing service Uber hit and killed a pedestrian crossing a darkened street in Tempe, Arizona seven months ago. That fatal collision attracted worldwide attention that cast a pall over the entire self-driving car industry as more people began to publicly question the safety of the vehicles.
“I suspect the Uber fatality has caused Waymo to slow down its pace a bit” and use human safety drivers in its ride-hailing service,” said Navigant Research analyst Sam Abuelsamid. “If people keep dying, there will be a bigger backlash against these vehicles.”
The Uber robotic car had a human safety driver behind the wheel, but that wasn’t enough to prevent its lethal accident in March.
Waymo’s self-driving vehicles are still susceptible to glitches, as an Associated Press reporter experienced during a mid-October ride in an autonomous minivan alongside Krafcik near company’s Mountain View, California, headquarters.
The minivan performed smoothly, even stopping for a jaywalker, before abruptly pulling to the right side of the road. Ahead was a left-turning FedEx delivery truck. In a digital message to the two human backup drivers, the van said it “detected an issue” and it would connect to a rider support agent. Rider support didn’t respond, so they switched to manual mode and returned to Waymo headquarters.
At that time, Krafcik conceded to the AP that Waymo’s self-driving vehicles were still encountering occasional problems negotiating left-hand turns at complicated intersections.
“I think the things that humans have challenges with, we’re challenged with as well,” Krafcik said. “So sometimes unprotected lefts are super challenging for a human, sometimes they’re super challenging for us.”
Waymo eventually plans to open its new ride-hailing app to all comers in the Phoenix area, although it won’t say when. It also wants to expand its service to other cities, but isn’t saying where. When that happens, it could pose a threat to Uber and the second most popular U.S. ride-hailing service, Lyft, especially since it should be able charge lower prices without the need to share revenue with a human driver in control at all times.
General Motors also is gearing up to begin offering a ride-hailing service through its Cruise subsidiary under the management of a new CEO, Dan Ammann, who has been the Detroit automaker’s No. 2 executive. Cruise plans to start its ride-hailing service at some point next year in at least one U.S. city. Another self-driving car company, Drive.ai, has been giving short-distance rides to all comers within Frisco, Texas and Arlington, Texas since the summer.
–––
AP Auto Writer Tom Krisher in Detroit contributed to this story.
Read or Share this story: https://www.detroitnews.com/story/business/autos/mobility/2018/12/05/google-robotic-spinoff-launches/38676567/

Waymo starts commercial ride-share service

Geoff Robins | AFP | Getty Images
John Krafcik, CEO of Waymo speaks at a press conference at the 2017 North American International Auto Show in Detroit, Michigan, January 8, 2017.

After months of testing and millions of miles developing self-driving vehicle technology, Waymo has officially launched the country's first commercial autonomous ride-share service.

The company's Waymo One program will give customers rides in self-driving vehicles 24 hours a day. Initially, the service will be limited to cities surrounding Phoenix, including Tempe, Mesa and Chandler.

While there may be many potential customers who want to ride in an autonomous vehicle, the Waymo One service will initially be offered to a limited number of people. Those customers will include hundreds of people in the Phoenix area who were test users of the Waymo self-driving vehicle fleet that has been in development since April 2017.

“Self-driving technology is new to many, so we're proceeding carefully with the comfort and convenience of our riders in mind,” said Waymo CEO John Krafcik. One example of Waymo taking a cautious approach rolling out its ride-share service is the company's use of safety drivers to supervise the rides, at least initially. In addition, the company's app and consoles in the Waymo One vehicles will allow riders to instantly connect with support agents who can assist riders with questions.

Alphabet's Waymo One marks the start of the race by automakers, tech companies and other firms to launch autonomous ride-share services. General Motors subsidiary Cruise plans to launch a similar service using self-driving vehicles next year.

What's driving the competition? The pursuit of greater profits. Studies of have shown the biggest cost for ride-share operations is the expense of paying a driver. General Motors estimates it costs ride -share companies more than $3 per mile in San Francisco. However, GM believes that cost could drop to roughly $1 per mile by 2025 with driverless vehicles in ride-share fleets.

Waymo has said it expects the cost to consumers for using Waymo One to be competitive with Uber, Lyft and other ride-hailing services.

What will happen to GM’s Voltec system now that the Chevy Volt has been discontinued?

2019 Chevrolet Volt
GM's discontinuation of the Chevy Volt plug-in hybrid—sorry, extended-range electric vehicle—technology last month came as a blow to many plug-in car fans.

The car could allow 90 percent of Americans, according to federal Bureau of Labor Statistics data, to drive to work and back every day without using a drop of gas.

For all intents and purposes it was an electric car that generated no range anxiety. If you went beyond its 53-mile electric range, you could just keep driving as far as you wanted on gas.

DON'T MISS: GM to kill Chevy Volt production in 2019 (Updated)

GM announced on Nov. 19 that it would discontinue building the car in a wave of layoffs and plant closings that saw both the Volt's factory and that of the Chevy Cruze that underpinned it cut off. As a fuel-efficient small hatchback, the Volt was no longer meeting sales targets.

That has left a lot of fans of its complex-but-ingenious Voltec gas-electric powertrain wondering whether they've missed the opportunity to own one (or another one), or whether GM or someone else might build another car along the same lines.

So our Twitter poll question for this week is: “What will happen to GM's Voltec system now that the Chevy Volt has been discontinued?”

Among the possibilities that occurred to us are that: It may just die. This is the scenario that most worries Volt fans.

GM will build an SUV with the Voltec battery-electric hybrid system, perhaps with a bigger battery, or slightly less range than the Volt with the same battery. (This seems the most likely scenario to us.)

CHECK OUT: Commentary: How the media may have punctured plug-in hybrids' balloon

GM could sell the Voltec technology to another automaker. In 2016, the company said it was looking for other companies to license the technology, but never found any takers.

Taken to the extreme (and to Volt fans' delight) our fourth answer considers that systems operating like Voltec could become the new normal, sort of a minimum barrier to entry for hybrid vehicles.

Whether you're an optimist or a pessimist about the Volt's technology, remember that our Twitter polls are unscientific because of a low response rate and because our respondents are self-selected. We can't wait to hear what you think!