CrimpIQ Cloud-Based Industrial Solution Saves Time and Money for Hydraulic and Industrial Hose Customers

European premiere: Smart crimper for hydraulic and industrial hose markets reduces costly downtime Coupling solution for digital age: CrimpCloud connectivity platform provides latest specifications and updates and enables remote maintenance Hanover, March 2019. Technology company Continental will be unveiling its smart crimper for hydraulic and industrial hoses, the CrimpIQ controller, to a European audience for… Continue reading CrimpIQ Cloud-Based Industrial Solution Saves Time and Money for Hydraulic and Industrial Hose Customers

Mercedes-Benz EQ Silver Arrow Formula E electric racing car debuts in special livery

Follow Bengt

Mercedes-Benz EQ Silver Arrow 01 concept
Mercedes-Benz is formally entering Formula E electric-car racing for the upcoming 2019-2020 season, and for the upcoming Geneva Motor Show it has revealed what it terms a “teaser” version of the racing car, called the EQ Silver Arrow 01.

Mercedes says that it “provides an idea of the team’s Formula E campaign to come.” The vehicle won’t be shown in its final livery, according to a release “at a later stage ahead of the season opener.”

DON’T MISS: 11 things you need to know about Formula E electric-car racing

“The blue touches and the subtle contrast between matte and gloss in conjunction with the star motif at the rear of the vehicle convey the concept of progressive luxury in electric motorsport,” said chief design officer Gordon Wagener of this version, in a company press release, with notes that the horizontal blue line symbolizes Mercedes’ electrification-focused EQ brand and is in contrast to the green hue of its Formula 1 car, the Mercedes-AMG F1 W10 EQ Power+.

“Formula E is going to be a completely new playing field for us,” said Toto Wolff, the head of Mercedes-Benz Motorsport. “But we are looking forward to the challenge of demonstrating the performance of our intelligent battery-electric drives in motorsport and of giving a positive boost to the EQ brand.”

CHECK OUT: Formula E signs on to complete battery recycling

Mercedes-Benz EQ Silver Arrow 01 concept

The upcoming 2019-2020 racing season will be the first one in which Mercedes will compete in both Formula 1 and Formula E.

Season 6 of Formula E, slated to start in December 2019, will also include Porsche for the first time. With the current Season 5, BMW entered as a manufacturer team, and Nissan entered Formula E, replacing its Renault affiliate.

Mercedes lists the top speed of its car as 174 mph, with an acceleration time of 0-60 mph in about 2.7 seconds.

READ MORE: New York race closes out Formula E season and multi-car strategy

The current season is the first with an all-new Gen2 racing car, with “halo” cockpit protection for the driver, higher power and top speeds, and no full-car swaps mid-race. At 52-kwh and 849 pounds, the battery that needs to power all Formula E cars for the entire 45-minute races is a product of McLaren Applied Technologies and Lucid Motors (Atieva), with Sony cells.

Three of 13 Season 5 races have already been held, with the next one on March 10 in Hong Kong and the season ending with two Brooklyn street circuit races on July 13-14, 2019.

Marshall buys Progress Group, adds more Skoda dealerships

Marshall Motor Holdings is claiming the title of the UK’s largest Skoda dealer after its takeover of Progress Group. Having recent added two outlets representing the Czech brand of Volkswagen Group from Sandicliffe Motor Group, it has now added four more Progress Skoda dealerships at Bedford, Harlow, Letchworth and Northampton. Once rebranded, these take the… Continue reading Marshall buys Progress Group, adds more Skoda dealerships

78% Of Tesla’s 2018 Model 3 Sales Were Online — Musk Email Sheds Light On New Sales Strategy

InvestElectric CarsElectric Car BenefitsElectric Car SalesSolar Energy RocksRSSAdvertisePrivacy Policy
Cars Published on March 3rd, 2019 | by Dr. Maximilian Holland
78% Of Tesla’s 2018 Model 3 Sales Were Online — Musk Email Sheds Light On New Sales StrategyTwitterLinkedInFacebookMarch 3rd, 2019 by Dr. Maximilian Holland

An email sent to Tesla employees by Elon Musk on Thursday explains some of the reasons for Tesla’s shift in sales strategy from brick-and-mortar stores to an online focus. Notably, 78% of all Model 3 sales in 2018 were already conducted online. Further, 82% of buyers didn’t even take a test drive before buying. Added to this, awareness of the Tesla brand is as strong as it has ever been, and prospective customers are forward-looking and tech-savvy, comfortable with online purchases. Transitioning from store-based sales to online sales, along with other efficiencies, reduces vehicle costs by an average 6%. That made this a priority area for overall savings and cost reductions.
The net effect of the shift is that Tesla’s vehicles are now being sold at more affordable price points, increasing demand and accelerating Tesla’s core mission.

Understanding the Change in Tesla’s Sales StrategyAny loss of jobs is never good news for those affected. It remains to be seen what proportion of store sales staff can be transitioned to roles in the galleries, showcases, and information centres that will be maintained in high traffic locations. There will be increasing positions in service and in manufacturing as well, but how many can transition to such jobs is unclear.
Tesla went from 899 employees in 2010 to an estimated 45,000 in Q4 last year, but with several periodic cutbacks to the workforce along the way. The cutbacks are unfortunate, but not unexpected in a fast evolving company seeking to ramp up the number of vehicles sold, learn on its feet, and seek cost efficiencies in every area of its operations.
In a phone-in session for journalists on Thursday, Musk called the move to online sales a “hard decision” which “unfortunately will entail a reduction” in the sales staff, but also called it an “extremely important strategic decision.”
Whilst the phone call did not go deep into the reasoning for the shift in sales strategy (instead focusing on the announcement of the $35,000 Model 3 and details about the car), the employee email on the same day did shed more light. I have attached the full text of the email at the end of this article. Obviously, reducing internal costs enough to enable the sale of the $35,000 Model 3 was a key proximate motivation for the strategy shift. But there’s also more context to understand the overall change in strategy. Amongst other points, the email noted that, in 2018:
“78% of all Model 3 orders were placed online, rather than in a store, and 82% of customers bought their Model 3 without ever having taken a test drive.”
Given that 140,000 Tesla Model 3s were sold in 2018, 78% online sales corresponds to almost 110,000 vehicles, of the 240,000 total 2018 vehicle sales (when we include Models S and X). That’s some 46% of the total. In 2019, the Model 3 will likely sell close to 300,000 units or more, and the S and X 80,000–100,000 (combined). This means that — assuming the same 78% online sales proportion of 2018 Model 3 sales — at least some 62% of overall sales would likely have come from online anyway, even without the recent changes.
The key question is: does Tesla actually need brick-and-mortar sales outlets to maintain brand awareness, drive demand, and create sales?

The EV Transition & Tesla’s Brand AwarenessConsider that, in the comments section of Zach’s recent article, one of our UK readers pointed out that the release of the $35,000 Model 3 was the #2 news story on the BBC. Given that the Tesla Model 3 won’t even begin delivery in the UK until sometime in the second half of 2019, that’s pretty healthy brand awareness right there.
There has been dramatic growth in awareness of EVs in general over the past couple of years. The vast majority of people who are considering transitioning to an EV are without doubt aware of Tesla. With the availability of the $35,000 variant of the Model 3, and low running costs, a Tesla EV is now within reach of a greater proportion of aspirational new car buyers in the key markets in which the company operates. Of the folks in these markets that are considering buying a new premium car anyway, many if not most of them are already aware of the Tesla brand. All in, it’s not hard to conceive that — even without brick-and-mortar sales stores — there’s enough demand to keep Tesla running at full production potential for at least the medium term. The upcoming Model Y reveal (and likely many more reservations) will only boost brand awareness and demand.
Tesla Model Y teaser.
Tesla has obviously crunched the numbers and decided that encouraging an online sales process — whilst keeping vehicles visible and curated by a few personnel in high-traffic areas in galleries (and similar locations) — will result in more than sufficient demand going forwards. Whilst being a calculated guesstimate, there’s surely a positive feedback between removing the significant cost of sales locations, thus allowing Tesla “to lower all vehicle prices by about 6% on average” (Musk email), thus bootstrapping relatively more demand and resulting in more customers overall.
As quoted above, that “82% of customers bought their Model 3 without ever having taken a test drive” shows that test drives are not needed for most prospective buyers to pull the trigger on a purchase — at least, they haven’t been. Tesla’s tweaked sales contract now allows customers who have not previously test driven the vehicle to return it within 7 days (or 1,000 miles) for a fast, full refund if they are not happy with the purchase. (This was also was part of the reasoning given in the employee email). Since driving a Tesla for the 1st time is invariably a revelation, the percentage of returns will likely be negligible. And there will likely still be some opportunities for test drives in key locations, even if that’s arranged via a service centre location (or even a mobile service/test drive) rather than a sales location per se. Our own Kyle Field got a home test drive from Tesla before purchasing his Model 3.

Finally, there are additional demand levers that Tesla can still pull if necessary. The company could readily re-introduce a referral program (albeit a more cost efficient and capped one). And leasing is not even offered yet on the Model 3. That’s a huge demand lever right there.
In short, with three Model 3 choices at price points between $35,000 and $40,000 — themselves to a large extent enabled by the move to an online sales focus — Tesla calculates that this reconfigured approach to sales and costs will generate more than enough demand going forwards, and further the company’s mission.
Whilst we can all agree that the loss of store sales jobs is sad, do you agree or disagree with Tesla’s reconfigured sales approach from the point of view of the business case? Please provide your own thoughts in the comments.
Here’s Elon Musk’s email to employees (Thursday, February 28):
Last month, I noted in my email that the fundamental issue Tesla must overcome is that our products remain too expensive for most people. We know there are many people who want to buy Model 3, but simply can’t afford to do so.
That is why we’re excited to announce today that we are now offering the standard Model 3 at $35,000. This is a significant milestone for Tesla, the culmination of years of hard work by employees across the company, and something of which you should all be very proud. You can read the details of the announcement on our blog: https://www.tesla.com/blog/35000-tesla-model-3-available-now
In addition, we are also making the decision to shift all sales worldwide to online only.
Last year, 78% of all Model 3 orders were placed online, rather than in a store, and 82% of customers bought their Model 3 without ever having taken a test drive. Customers can now buy a Tesla in North America via their phone in about 1 minute, and that capability will soon be extended worldwide. We are also making it much easier to try out and return a Tesla without a test drive. You can now return a car within 7 days or 1,000 miles for a full refund. Customers are becoming increasingly comfortable making purchases online, and that is especially true for Tesla — which is a testament to the products we make.
As a result, over the next few months, we will be winding down many of our stores and significantly reducing our spend on sales and marketing, which will help make the price changes we’ve announced today possible. Shifting all sales online combined with other ongoing cost efficiency will enable us to lower all vehicle prices by about 6% on average, allowing us to achieve the $35,000 Model 3 price point.
A small number of stores in high-traffic locations will remain as galleries, showcases and Tesla information centers. At the same time, we will be increasing our investment in the Tesla service system and manufacturing, and I expect that headcount to grow next year.
Unfortunately, this means that some jobs will be impacted or transitioned to other areas of the business. This is a hard decision, but it necessary to make our cars more affordable. Our sales team has fought on the front lines of advancing our mission and has been our connection to hundreds of thousands of customers along the way. I want to express my sincere gratitude for all that you’ve done.
In the coming weeks, we will be evaluating all of our sales and marketing organization to understand where there are operational efficiencies, and how best to support the transition to online sales while also continuing to deliver a truly awesome and educational Tesla buying experience.
We’ll be sharing more information on this transition soon.
Thank you,
Elon

About the ..

UPDATE 1-Tesla’s store-shuttering strategy may pull the rug out of solar

SAN FRANCISCO (Reuters) – Tesla Inc’s sudden decision to shutter the bulk of its stores around the world raises a red flag over the future of its solar branch, a declining business it paid $2.6 billion for in a controversial 2016 deal. FILE PHOTO: A SolarCity vehicle is shown in San Diego, California, U.S., November… Continue reading UPDATE 1-Tesla’s store-shuttering strategy may pull the rug out of solar

RPT-Tesla’s store-shuttering strategy may pull the rug out of solar

SAN FRANCISCO (Reuters) – Tesla Inc’s sudden decision to shutter the bulk of its stores around the world raises a red flag over the future of its solar branch, a declining business it paid $2.6 billion for in a controversial 2016 deal. FILE PHOTO: A SolarCity vehicle is shown in San Diego, California, U.S., November… Continue reading RPT-Tesla’s store-shuttering strategy may pull the rug out of solar

Sixt merges car sharing and car rental: “We are responsible for car dealership”

DPA Alexander Sixt is the head of strategy of the car rental company of the same name and the eldest son of company founder Erich Sixt With its new, global mobility platform “One”, Germany’s largest car rental company now offers Sixt Car rental, car sharing and travel services in a single app on. Strategy director… Continue reading Sixt merges car sharing and car rental: “We are responsible for car dealership”

Subaru Corporation Announces Changes in Directors and Auditors(Effective June 2019)

March 1, 2019

Subaru Corporation Announces Changes in Directors and Auditors
(Effective June 2019)

Tokyo, March 1, 2019 – The Board of Directors of Subaru Corporation today resolved the following changes in the members of the Board of Directors and the Board of Corporate Auditors, with the aim of reinforcing the company’s corporate governance. Appointments of the Directors and Auditors will be proposed at the Company’s 88th General Meeting of Shareholders scheduled for June 2019.

1. Nominees for Directors
All of the current Directors will retire on the expiration of their term of office.
Nominees for new Directors are as follows:

Director of the Board
Chairman
Yasuyuki Yoshinaga
(Current title: Director of the Board, Chairman )

Representative Director of the Board
President
Tomomi Nakamura
(Current title: Representative Director of the Board, President)


Representative Director of the Board
Deputy President
Kazuo Hosoya
(Current title: Deputy President)

Director of the Board
Executive Vice President
Toshiaki Okada
(Current title: Director of the Board, Executive Vice President)

Director of the Board
Executive Vice President
Yoichi Kato
(Current title: Director of the Board, Executive Vice President)

Director of the Board
Executive Vice President
Tetsuo Onuki
(Current title: Director of the Board, Executive Vice President)

Outside Director
Shigehiro Aoyama
(Current title: Outside Director)


Outside Director
Yasuyuki Abe
(Current title: Outside Corporate Auditor)


Outside Director
Natsunosuke Yago
(Current title: Chairman of the Board, Ebara Corporation)

◎: Newly appointed

2. Nominees for Corporate Auditors
Akira Mabuchi and Shinichi Mita will retire as Corporate Auditors on the expiration of their term of office.
Yasuyuki Abe will resign.
Nominees for new Corporate Auditors are as follows:

Standing Corporate Auditor
Akira Mabuchi
(Current title: Standing Corporate Auditor )


Outside Corporate Auditor
Shigeru Nosaka
(Current title: Vice Chairman of the Board of Directors, Oracle Corporation Japan)


Outside Corporate Auditor
Kyoko Okada
(Current title: Audit & Supervisory Board Member (standing), Shiseido Co., Ltd.)

◎: Newly appointed

As current Corporate Auditor Shuzo Haimoto will continue to be in his term of office, the total number of Corporate Auditors will be four.

3. Retiring Director

Yoshinori Komamura (Current title: Outside Director)

4. New Board of Directors
(Subject to election of Directors at the Company’s 88th General Meeting of Shareholders scheduled for June 2019)

Name

Areas of responsibility
as Executive Officer
(Effective April 1, 2019)

Yasuyuki Yoshinaga
Director
Chairman
Chairman of the Board of Directors

Tomomi Nakamura
Representative Director
President
Member of the Executive Nomination Meeting and the Executive Compensation Meeting
– Chief Executive Officer (CEO)
– Aerospace Company
– Quality

Kazuo Hosoya
Representative Director
Deputy President
Member of the Executive Nomination Meeting and the Executive Compensation Meeting
– Manufacturing
– China Project Office

Chief General Manager of Manufacturing Div. and Gunma Plant

Toshiaki Okada
Director
Executive Vice President
Member of the Executive Nomination Meeting and the Executive Compensation Meeting
– Chief Financial Officer (CFO)
– Secretarial Office
– Finance & Accounting Dept.
– Human Resources Dept.

Yoichi Kato
Director
Executive Vice President

– Chief Risk Management Officer (CRMO)
– Risk Management Group
– External Relations Dept.
– Intellectual Property Dept.

Tetsuo Onuki
Director
Executive Vice President

– Chief Technology Officer (CTO)

Shigehiro Aoyama
Outside Director
Member of the Executive Nomination Meeting and the Executive Compensation Meeting

Yasuyuki Abe
Outside Director
Member of the Executive Nomination Meeting and the Executive Compensation Meeting

Natsunosuke Yago
Outside Director
Member of the Executive Nomination Meeting and the Executive Compensation Meeting

###

[PDF/364 KB]

A month ago, Elon Musk thought Tesla would be profitable. Now he doesn’t. What changed?

Noah Berger | Reuters
Tesla Chief Executive Office Elon Musk speaks at his company's factory in Fremont, California.

How rapidly things change in Silicon Valley.

A month ago, Tesla CEO Elon Musk seemed confident the electric car maker would turn a profit in the first quarter. Now he's predicting a loss. The reversal — disclosed on a media call Thursday night — overshadowed what was supposed to be good news during a tough week of headlines: Tesla was finally unveiling its long-awaited Model 3 sedan at $35,000.

The shares, already under pressure from Musk's ongoing tussle with federal securities regulators, tanked by almost 8 percent in midday trading Friday.

To make its popular electric car at a more affordable price for consumers, Musk said the company has to trim stores, cut employees and shift sales online. It's all part of a push to profitably sell the long-anticipated (and much delayed) $35,000 variant of the Model 3, the midsize sedan Musk and company had long bet would take Tesla from a niche manufacturer to a major automaker.

On Jan. 30, Musk told investors he thought Tesla would continue making money after finally turning its first back-to-back profits during the third and fourth quarters of last year, fulfilling his previous forecast that Tesla would become “sustainably profitable” from the third quarter of 2018 onward.

“I would say at this point I'm optimistic about being profitable in Q1,” Musk said on the Jan. 30 conference call discussing the company's fourth-quarter earnings. “Not by a lot, but I'm optimistic about being profitable in Q1 and for all quarters going forward.”

So what happened?

Musk cited one-time charges this quarter as one major factor, though he did not specify what those are. The company has $920 million in debt due Friday, and Musk has previously said it had enough cash on hand to cover.

He also said there have been some difficulties getting cars to China and Europe.

How much money Tesla can make selling a cheaper Model 3, and whether customers will actually buy it, are major concerns among investors.

“Tesla cut the size of their battery by 30 percent to get this $35,000 base unit out the door,” said Craig Irwin, an analyst with Roth Capital Partners. That is probably a reduction in cost of about $5,500 per car, Irwin said. But who wants a low-range car, he said.

“They killed the 60 kWh Model S for poor demand, and even weaker margins,” he said. “It seems to dovetail nicely that 2019 will see major margin pressure,” he said.

The fact that the company is moving all vehicle sales online and cutting retail jobs also suggests it is coming to the realization that many industry observers suspected all along — profitably selling a $35,000 electric car will be very difficult.

“Tesla appears to have answered the question we have long asked around whether the company was going to be able to profitably produce the $35k Model 3 through production efficiencies and increased volumes,” Cowen analyst Jeff Osborne said in a note to clients Friday. “Switching the strategy now to shed stores that are the face of the brand beyond Elon Musk's Twitter feed, likely means that management has come to the realization that it was not going to be feasible.”

It is also significant that this is all happening as federal tax credits for Tesla cars start to wind down, said CFRA analyst Garrett Nelson. The first 200,000 customers to buy Tesla cars received a federal tax credit of $7,500. But those were halved at the beginning of the year, after Tesla hit the limit. They will continue to be phased out by the quarter.

“I think it all goes back to the EV tax credits, which are negatively impacting sales and gross margins,” Nelson said.

Red flags went up for Nelson just a few days after the New Year when Tesla said it would cut prices on its vehicles. Then the company announced it would focus on producing higher-cost exports to China and Europe, lay off workers and introduce a Model 3 leasing program, he said.

“The earnings warning just confirms these red flags, and while it's a bit early to say, it appears that the company's profitability challenges could potentially linger well beyond Q1,” he said.

The announcement certainly was abrupt and did not appear to be made from a position of strength, said Bernstein analyst Toni Sacconaghi in a note Friday. But over the long term there are still several levers Tesla can pull to improve profits, including reducing sales and manufacturing costs as well as driving higher sales volume with the cheaper Model 3, its leasing programs and international expansion, he said.

“In some ways, we believe CEO Musk's recent focus on profitability each quarter may have been misplaced – and that Tesla might be best served by looking to press its brand and first mover advantage by aggressively making and distributing its cars – which yesterday's move appears to be doing,” he said.