SAN FRANCISCO, July 9, 2019 /PRNewswire/ — Ridecell Inc., the leading platform provider for shared and autonomous mobility operators, and Blu Smart, the pioneers in all-electric shared smart mobility, today announced Ridecell as the platform provider for the recently launched Blu Smart Mobility ride share service in India. The first all-electric rideshare service on the Indian… Continue reading Blu Smart Chooses Ridecell to Power First All-Electric Ride Sharing Car Service in India – PRNewswire
Tag: Financial Results
NIO Inc. Provides Second Quarter 2019 Delivery Update
Delivered 3,553 ES8 and ES6 vehicles in the second quarter of 2019 Delivered 1,340 vehicles in June 2019, including 927 ES8s and 413 ES6s Cumulative deliveries of ES8 and ES6 reached 18,890 SHANGHAI, China, July 10, 2019 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) — NIO Inc. (“NIO” or the “Company”) (NYSE: NIO), a pioneer in China’s premium electric vehicle market,… Continue reading NIO Inc. Provides Second Quarter 2019 Delivery Update
Udelv partners with HEB on Texas autonomous grocery delivery pilot
Autonomous delivery company Udelv has signed yet another partner to launch a new pilot of its self-driving goods delivery service: Texas-based supermarket chain HEB Group. The pilot will provide service to customers in Olmos Park, just outside of downtown San Antonio where the grocery retailer is based. California-based Udelv will provide HEB with one of… Continue reading Udelv partners with HEB on Texas autonomous grocery delivery pilot
Volvo solves autonomous revenue riddle with package deals
STOCKHOLM (Reuters) – Swedish truckmaker AB Volvo’s first commercial autonomous truck deal shows how it is bundling services to generate revenue from a technology that is years away from wide deployment. FILE PHOTO: A self-driving Volvo electric truck with no cab called Vera is seen during a presentation in Berlin, Germany, September 12, 2018. REUTERS/Emma… Continue reading Volvo solves autonomous revenue riddle with package deals
Greenhous Group acquires Southampton’s Adams Morey
Greenhous Group has acquired £61 million turnover Adams Morey to grow its representation with Fiat vans and Daf Trucks and Ford van servicing. The Telford-based retail group rose from 15th to 14th in the AM100 rankings last month and looks set to continue its growth in 2019 following the new acquisition, which adds to its… Continue reading Greenhous Group acquires Southampton’s Adams Morey
Notice Regarding Disposal of Own Shares as Restricted Stock Compensation
July 10, 2019
Notice Regarding Disposal of Own Shares as Restricted Stock Compensation
Company name:SUBARU CORPORATION
Representative:Tomomi Nakamura, President and CEO
Code number:7270 (First Section of Tokyo Stock Exchange)
Contact for inquiries:Katsuo Saito, Corporate Vice President
and General Manager of Investor Relations Department
Phone:+81-3-6447-8825
Subaru Corporation (the “Company”) hereby announces that its Board of Directors, pursuant to Article 370 of the Companies Act of Japan and Article 29 of the Articles of Incorporation (written resolution in lieu of a Board of Directors meeting), resolved to dispose of its own shares as stock compensation as follows (the “Disposal of Own Shares”).
1. Overview of Disposal
(1) Disposal date
July 31, 2019
(2) Class and number of shares to be disposed
56,827 shares of common stock of the Company
(3) Disposal price
¥2,632 per share
(4) Total value of share disposal
¥149,568,664
(5) Grantees of shares and number thereof;
number of shares to be granted
The Company’s Directors (excluding Outside Directors)
6 persons, 20,134 shares
Corporate vice presidents
19 persons, 36,693 shares
(6) Other
The Disposal of Own Shares is conditioned on the Securities Registration Statement taking effect in accordance with the Financial Instruments and Exchange Act.
2. Purpose and Reasons for Disposal
The Company, its Board of Directors, at the meeting held on April 28, 2017, resolved to introduce a Restricted Stock Compensation Plan (the “Plan”) as a new compensation plan for the Company’s Directors other than the Outside Directors and corporate vice presidents (collectively, the “Eligible Officers”) with the purpose of raising awareness of their contribution to the sustained improvement of the corporate value of the Company. Furthermore, at the 86th Annual General Meeting of Shareholders held on June 23, 2017, it was approved by the shareholders that under the Plan, the compensation for no more than 100,000 the granting of restricted stocks per year will be provided to the Eligible Officers.
This time, based on the Plan, after the consideration of the purpose of the Plan, the Company’s business performance, the scope and nature of the performance of duties of each of the Eligible Officers, and various circumstances, the Company decided to pay a total amount of ¥149,568,664 in the monetary compensation claim and grant 56,827 shares of the common stock of the Company by way of in-kind contribution of the said monetary compensation claim to 6 Eligible Directors and 19 corporate vice presidents. Furthermore, since the purpose of the Plan is to provide the management with incentives to achieve sustained improvement of the corporate value of the Company and to share more of that value with the Company’s shareholders, the Transfer Restriction Period has been set at 3 years.
For the Disposal of Own Shares, the Eligible Officers to whom the stock is scheduled to be granted will pay in all the said monetary compensation claim as property contributed in kind, and receive the common stock of the Company to be disposed of by the Company.
3. Overview of the Contract Regarding the Grant
The Company and each of the Eligible Officers will execute the Contract Regarding the Grant individually, which is summarized as follows:
(1)Transfer Restriction Period: July 31, 2019 through July 31, 2022
(2)Conditions for Cancellation of the transfer restrictions
The transfer restrictions for all of the granted shares held by the Eligible Officers will be cancelled at the expiration of the Transfer Restriction Period. Additionally, in cases where any one of the Eligible Officers loses all of his/her status as a director, officer, corporate vice president or employee of the Company or any of its subsidiaries during the Transfer Restriction Period, due to death, completion of his/her term of office or reaching of his/her retirement age, or any other legitimate reasons approved by the Board of Directors of the Company, the transfer restrictions on all the shares granted to the said one of the Eligible Officers shall be cancelled immediately after such his/her status is lost.
(3)The Company’s acquisition of the shares at no cost
In cases where any one of the Eligible Officers loses all of his/her status as a director, officer, corporate vice president or employee of the Company or any of its subsidiaries during the Transfer Restriction Period, the Company shall naturally acquire at no cost all of the granted shares held by the said one of the Eligible Officers at the time of such lost. However, this shall not apply to cases where such losing of his/her status occurs due to death, completion of his/her term of office or reaching of his/her retirement age, or other legitimate reasons approved by the Board of Directors of the Company.
(4)Administration of shares
To prevent the Eligible Officers from transferring, setting collateral rights for, or otherwise disposing of the granted shares during the Transfer Restriction Period, each of the Eligible Officers opens a dedicated account with Mizuho Securities Co., Ltd. for administration of the granted shares. To enforce the transfer restrictions, etc. on the granted shares, the Company enters into a contract with Mizuho Securities Co., Ltd. for the administration of the accounts of the granted shares held by the Eligible Officers. In addition, the Company has obtained consent from the Eligible Officers as to the details of the said transfer restrictions, etc.
(5)Treatment in the event of organizational restructuring, etc.
Prior to the expiration of the Transfer Restriction Period, if the General Meeting of Shareholders of the Company approves of any matters with regard to a merger contract under which the Company will become a dissolving company; an absorption-type split agreement or incorporation-type company split plan under which the Company will be a split company (but only if the Company, on the effective date of the company split, delivers to the Company’s shareholders a whole or part of the consideration for the said company split that it acquired); a share exchange agreement or share transfer plan under which the Company will become the wholly owned subsidiary; or any other organizational restructuring, etc. set forth in the Contract Regarding the Grant (or, in cases where the approval at the General Meeting of Shareholders of the Company for the said organizational restructuring, etc. is not necessary, if the Board of Directors of the Company approves), based on a resolution of the Board of Directors, the transfer restrictions shall be cancelled immediately before the business day immediately prior to the effective date of the said organizational restructuring, etc., regarding the number of the granted shares that is reasonably calculated considering the period from the beginning of the Transfer Restriction Period to the approval date of the said organizational restructuring, etc.
4. Basis of calculating the amount to be paid in for the granted shares and other specific details
The Disposal of Own Shares shall be funded by the monetary compensation claim provided as a restricted stock compensation by the Company and any of its subsidiaries under the Plan. To eliminate arbitrariness in the disposal price, the average closing price of the Company’s common stock on the Tokyo Stock Exchange over the one-month period up to the day immediately preceding July 10, 2019 (from June 10, 2019 through July 9, 2019) of ¥2,632 (with amounts less than ¥1 truncated here and elsewhere) was used as the disposal price, which is believed to be reasonable as the market price.
Note that the divergence ratio from the closing price on the Tokyo Stock Exchange of ¥2,789 on the day immediately preceding the date of the resolution by the Board of Directors was (5.63 %) (Divergence figures have been rounded up at the three-digit level below the decimal here and elsewhere). The divergence ratio from the simple average value of ¥2,644 of the closing prices for the three-month period (from April 10, 2019 to July 9, 2019) was (0.45 %), and the divergence ratio from the simple average value of ¥2,654 of the closing price for the six-month period (from January 10, 2019 to July 9, 2019) was (0.83 %). Accordingly, the price is believed not to be particularly favorable to the share recipients.
###
[PDF/164 KB]
GOJEK said to have secured investment from Thailand’s Siam Commercial Bank
Ride-hailing giant Go-Jek has secured an investment from Siam Commercial Bank Pcl, the Thai lender that counts King Maha Vajiralongkorn as its biggest shareholder, according to people familiar with the matter. It’s unclear how much Thailand’s biggest bank is investing in Go-Jek, the people said, who asked not to be identified because the matter is… Continue reading GOJEK said to have secured investment from Thailand’s Siam Commercial Bank
Harald Krüger To Step Down As CEO Of BMW
Invest
Electric Cars
Electric Car Benefits
Electric Car Sales
Solar Energy Rocks
RSS
Advertise
Privacy Policy
Autonomous Vehicles
Published on July 6th, 2019 |
by Steve Hanley
Harald Krüger To Step Down As CEO Of BMW
Twitter
LinkedIn
Facebook
July 6th, 2019 by Steve Hanley
Just a few days ago, Klaus Fröhlich, the head of research and development for BMW, was whining to the press that nobody wants to buy electric cars. Well, actually, as it turns out, nobody wants to buy BMWs if the latest financials for the company are any indication. According to the Toronto Star, BMW has seen its position as Germany’s luxury car leader evaporate over the past few years and is facing strong financial pressure associated with developing electric and self driving cars that can compete with the likes of Tesla and other manufacturers.
The BMW Group has delivered more than 100,000 electrified vehicles to customers worldwide in 2017, as promised at the beginning of the year. An eye-catching light installation transformed the BMW Group headquarters, the world-famous “Four-Cylinder” in the north of Munich, on the evening of 18 December 2017 into a battery. (Ralph Larmann, 12/2017)
Now it reportedly will not renew the current contract for its CEO, Harald Krüger, when it expires next April. The company has just reported its weakest earnings in a decade, a reversal after sporting some of the highest profit margins in the automotive business for many years.
Krüger was chosen to lead the company in December, 2014 after his predecessor, Herbert Diess, left unexpectedly to take the reins at rival Volkswagen. In a statement to the press, he said, “After more than 10 years in the board of management, more than four of which as the CEO of the BMW Group, I would like to pursue new professional endeavors and leverage my diverse international experience for new projects and ventures.”
It is customary for German companies to renew the CEO’s contract one year before its termination. When BMW did not do so in April of this year, it started speculation that Krüger would step aside when his contract ended instead of signing on for another 5 year term.
BMW was once thought of as a leader in the nascent electric car field when it brought its highly innovative BMW i3 electric car to market in 2013. But, the company failed to capitalize on its early lead as it struggled to find a way forward for EVs.
BMW i3s at the National Drive Electric Week Event in Oxnard, California. Image credit: Kyle Field | CleanTechnica
Krüger was “too cautious,” Ferdinand Dudenhoeffer, director of the CAR Center for Automotive Research at the University of Duisburg-Essen tells The Star. “BMW was not able to use the head start for a new generation of electric vehicles.”
David Bailey, a professor at the Birmingham Business School, told CNN that BMW needed to accelerate its move into new technologies. “[Krüger has] done a very good job in recent years, but BMW faces some very big challenges going ahead. They felt the needed to bring in somebody new given the scale of the challenge.”
The Tesla Effect
It has not been lost on management or customers that the Tesla Model S is now the best selling large luxury car in Germany, which is hugely embarrassing to BMW as well as Mercedes-Benz and Audi. We may never know exactly how the changes in the marketplace brought about by Tesla have affected the fortunes of those companies but there is little question it has roiled the industry and forced companies to confront the coming electric vehicle revolution faster than they might done otherwise.
The Tesla Model S. Image courtesy: Tesla
In addition to being hit with an antitrust penalty of $1.6 billion by EU authorities recently, BMW has has been adversely affected by a rise in tariffs on vehicles exported to China from its plant in South Carolina due to the tariff war going on between the US and China. In March, it downgraded its profit projections for 2019 and announced a cost saving plan that will trim $13.6 billion in costs by the end of 2022. That plan focuses on dropping some models and streamlining vehicle development.
Bankwupt?
BMW says it is rushing to bring electric cars to market, but in truth, when your head of R&D says nobody wants to buy electric cars it is hard to take such statements seriously. At CleanTechnica, we have said for a while that some traditional car companies may go out of business or be forced to merge with other companies as a result of the arrival of electric vehicles.
BMW and Mercedes have indicated they will collaborate on the development of electric and self driving cars, a sign that a consolidation in the industry may already be under way. Unless BMW can get back on track with its development of competitive electric, autonomous vehicles, it could even be the first traditional automaker to go bankwupt — but it probably won’t be the last.
About the Author
Steve Hanley Steve writes about the interface between technology and sustainability from his home in Rhode Island and anywhere else the Singularity may lead him. His motto is, “Life is not measured by how many breaths we take but by the number of moments that take our breath away!” You can follow him on Google + and on Twitter.
Back to Top ↑
Intern OpportunitiesWe Need You! Internship Program Openings
Advertisement
Advertise with CleanTechnica to get your company in front of millions of monthly readers.
CleanTechnica Clothing & Cups
Top News On CleanTechnica
Join CleanTechnica Today!
Advertisement
Advertisement
Follow CleanTechnica Follow @cleantechnica
Our Electric Car Driver Report
Read & share our new report on “electric car drivers, what they desire, and what the demand.”
The EV Safety Advantage
Read & share our free report on EV safety, “The EV Safety Advantage.”
EV Charging Guidelines for Cities
Share our free report on EV charging guidelines for cities, “Electric Vehicle Charging Infrastructure: Guidelines For Cities.”
30 Electric Car Benefits
Our Electric Vehicle Reviews
Tesla News
Cleantech Press Releases
Hannon Armstrong & Summit Ridge To Jointly Invest In Community Solar; Initial Projects Launching in Maryland
“That Was Quick” Category: Carbon Engineering Partners With Occidental To Pump More Oil
Texas Cooperatives Agree to Purchase 7 MW of Distribution-Scale Solar Energy
38 Anti-Cleantech Myths
Wind & Solar Prices Beat Fossils
Cost of Solar Panels Collapses
© 2018 Sustainable Enterprises Media, Inc.
Invest
Electric Cars
Electric Car Benefits
Electric Car Sales
Solar Energy Rocks
RSS
Advertise
Privacy Policy
This site uses cookies: Find out more.Okay, thanks
Tesla CEO Elon Musk pours cold water on fans waiting for Model S, Model X refresh
Elon Musk, co-founder and chief executive officer of Tesla Motors.Yuriko Nakao | Bloomberg | Getty ImagesTesla CEO Elon Musk said on Twitter Monday night that the company is planning “a series of minor ongoing changes” for its older Model S and Model X vehicles, but not a major refresh.
Musk's declaration follows the departure of Tesla's former vice president of production, Peter Hochholdinger, who oversaw Model S and X manufacturing during his tenure there. Hochholdinger has joined Lucid Motors, a would-be Tesla competitor that plans to ship its first electric vehicle next year. Lucid CEO Peter Rawlinson was previously the chief engineer of Tesla Model S.
In May, Tesla employees told CNBC the company was then planning a Model S refresh that would potentially include a 400-mile range battery — a goal that Musk later nodded to during a shareholders' meeting, although he didn't say it would be for the Model S — and could use Model 3 seats. They also said Tesla was rejiggering its Fremont, California, factory to make way for the refresh and for production of its upcoming Model Y crossover.
While plans for the Model S refresh have been reined in, changes at the Fremont plant are underway, according to a passel of new filings with the City of Fremont.
Specifically, the filings reveal that Tesla aims to overhaul its body-in-white and paint facilities and equipment in Fremont before embarking on its next phase of electric vehicle production.
Musk promised that Tesla would deliver between 90,000 and 100,000 vehicles for the second quarter of 2019, and this time, his forecasting was right on target with Tesla reporting deliveries of 95,200 cars to customers for the second quarter.
A Tesla Model S is displayed during the London Motor and Tech Show at ExCel on May 16, 2019 in London, England.John Keeble | Getty Images News | Getty ImagesWaxing optimistic about demand in its production and deliveries report last week, Tesla stated:
“Orders generated during the quarter exceeded our deliveries, thus we are entering Q3 with an increase in our order backlog. We believe we are well positioned to continue growing total production and deliveries in Q3.”
However, the company did not specify if “orders generated” included those for vehicles besides their Model 3, S and X. Tesla has already begun taking orders for its Model Y, which is a crossover SUV, and for its electric Semi. It has a Roadster refresh and Tesla pickup in the works, as well.
None are in commercial production yet.
On its existing lines, Tesla produced a record87,048 electric vehicles during the second quarter of 2019. Tesla's earlier record was in the fourth quarter of 2018, when it produced 86,555 vehicles.
Company executives have repeatedly stated that Tesla expects to deliver at least 360,000 vehicles to customers in 2019, meaning they have to deliver 201,650 to hit their own guidance in the second half of the year.
That will require production to ramp significantly beyond previous levels.
WATCH: Elon Musk says Tesla will have 'robotaxis' on the road by 2020
VIDEO1:2601:26Elon Musk says Tesla will have 'robotaxis' on the road by 2020The Bottom LineFollow @CNBCtech on Twitter for the latest tech industry news.
Ferrari one-off models have five-year waiting list
The growing trend for one-off Ferraris is in response to clients’ increasing demands for extreme personalisation, says Ferrari commercial and marketing boss Enrico Galliera. Such is demand, Galliera says unique models “have the longest waiting list of all our product lines” at four to five years. “The client has not only a unique car but… Continue reading Ferrari one-off models have five-year waiting list