EU ready to retaliate if US imposes car tariffs: European Commission chief

FRANKFURT: European Commission chief Jean-Claude Juncker warned Friday the EU would hit back with tariffs of its own if Donald Trump made good on threats to slap duties on foreign cars, as an EU-US trade truce wobbled. “We agreed with Trump on a kind of ceasefire when it comes to new car tariffs,” Juncker told… Continue reading EU ready to retaliate if US imposes car tariffs: European Commission chief

Dyson gears up for electric car testing

Dyson has unveiled plans for a 10-mile test track in Wiltshire where its new electric cars will be put through their paces. The track and other facilities are part of a plan to start selling a “radical” electric car from 2021. The company best known for its vacuums and domestic appliances bought the disused airfield… Continue reading Dyson gears up for electric car testing

‘We don’t like the trade war,’ says one of China’s biggest carmakers

China is a big market for MPVs: Geely Automobile
11:07 PM ET Wed, 22 Aug 2018 | 02:03

Geely Automobile, the third-largest carmaker in China, has been largely shielded from the ongoing trade tensions between Beijing and Washington. But the company could still be hit in other ways if the dispute drags on, a top executive said.

Geely doesn't rely on imported parts to make its cars, not does it sell many of its products outside China, which helps the automaker avoid direct hits from the trade dispute, according to Daniel Li, Geely's vice chairman and chief financial officer.

“Geely doesn't have a lot of sales to other countries yet … we don't have any cars sold to the U.S.,” Li told CNBC's “Squawk Box” on Thursday. “Nevertheless, we don't like the trade war,” he added.

Li explained that the dispute between the world's two largest economies has generated a lot of uncertainty and is starting to affect consumers' willingness to spend.

His comments come a day after the company announced a 54 percent year-over-year jump in net profit for the first half of 2018. The net profit of 6.67 billion yuan ($971.3 million) is higher than the 6.55 billion yuan estimated by four analysts, according to Thomson Reuters data.

The company sold 766,630 vehicles during the first six months of the year, 44 percent higher than the same period in 2017 and outperforming the overall automobile sales in China, Li said.

Li said the company is on track to meet its full year sales target of 1.58 million units, and has plans to launch five new models later this year, including a multi-purpose vehicle (MPV).

“As you know, China has a new birth policy to encourage every family to have a second child instead of only one child,” Li said, explaining that families would soon require more seats in a car to accommodate grandparents, parents and two children. That opens up the opportunity to sell more MPVs, which typically have seven seats, Li said.

Despite the strong earnings report, Geely shares in Hong Kong were down about 1.3 percent on Thursday morning. But some analysts remain upbeat about the company's prospects.

“The outlook for Geely remains strong, in our view, led by a strong product pipeline … Geely is still our top sector pick,” analysts from Daiwa Capital Markets wrote in a Wednesday report after the company released its earnings report.

— Reuters contributed to this report.

(LEAD) Hyundai Motor creates new exec position to increase sales in China

(ATTN: MOVES UP photo; ADDS sales data in China and background in last 3 paras) SEOUL, Aug. 24 (Yonhap) — Hyundai Motor Group, South Korea’s biggest automotive conglomerate, said Friday it has created a new executive post to improve lackluster sales in China, the world’s biggest automobile market. Hyundai named Vice Chairman Kwon Moon-sik, who… Continue reading (LEAD) Hyundai Motor creates new exec position to increase sales in China

Coup of cold stock on the automobile

Black day for Continental. The German equipment maker fell Wednesday about 14% on the Frankfurt Stock Exchange, its largest decline since 2009, causing in its fall the European automotive values. At the Paris Bourse, Michelin, Valeo, Faurecia or Peugeot also gave ground – but to a lesser extent -, just like Pirellli in Milan or… Continue reading Coup of cold stock on the automobile

A day in the life of a Waymo self-driving taxi

In a nondescript depot in suburban Arizona, the future of transportation is getting a tune-up. This is where Waymo, the self-driving unit of Google parent Alphabet, houses its growing fleet of self-driving cars — hundreds of Chrysler Pacifica minivans fitted with highly advanced hardware and software that enables them to safely ride on public roads… Continue reading A day in the life of a Waymo self-driving taxi

Elon Musk’s stunning interview was a $1 billion gift to the short sellers he loathes

VCG | Getty Images
Elon Musk, Tesla CEO, addresses a press conference in October 2015.

The investors betting against Tesla just got a gift from the company's chief executive, Elon Musk.

Mr. Musk opened up on Thursday in an emotional interview with The New York Times about the toll the past year has taken on him, blaming those so-called short-sellers for much of his stress. It followed his cryptic tweet last week about converting the publicly traded company into a private one, which created a frenzy in the market.

The day after the interview, the stock of the electric-car maker tumbled 9 percent to $306.

Those losses were gains for the short-sellers. The slide in Tesla's shares generated more than $1 billion in profits for short-sellers, according to S3 Partners, a financial technology and analytics firm, which tracks the positions held by those investors.

The stock drop helped them recover much of their losses that came on Aug. 7, the day Mr. Musk tweeted he was considering taking Tesla private at a stock price of $420. Short-sellers lost $1.3 billion that day after Tesla's shares jumped 11 percent on the news.

Read more from The New York Times:

Elon Musk Details 'Excruciating' Personal Toll of Tesla Turmoil

Tesla Directors, in Damage Control Mode, Want Elon Musk to Stop Tweeting

Did Elon Musk Violate Securities Laws With Tweet About Taking Tesla Private?

Mr. Musk had long sparred with investors who make money when the company's stock falls. And he is bracing for the fight to get worse. Mr. Musk told The New York Times that he was expecting ''at least a few months of extreme torture from the short-sellers, who are desperately pushing a narrative that will possibly result in Tesla's destruction.''

Tesla is among the most shorted stocks in the United States. More than a quarter of its stock valued at more than $11 billion is being shorted, according to S3 Partners.

Short-sellers have increased their bets against Tesla this year as its struggles have mounted. The company has continued to lose money. Its Model 3, crucial to the company becoming profitable, has faced glitches and delays.

In March, a driver was killed after a Model X crashed into a concrete highway divider while Autopilot, Tesla's driver-assistance feature, was in use.

That same month, Moody's Investors Service downgraded the company's credit rating, concerned that the company was burning through cash.

It has made for a bumpy ride for Tesla investors — on either side of the trade.

Through it all, Mr. Musk's public attacks on shorts have only intensified.

In May, he took to Twitter and warned of the ''short burn of the century comin soon.'' A month later, he predicted that those wagering on the stock's decline ''had three weeks before their short position explodes.'' He even taunted David Einhorn, whose Greenlight Capital hedge fund has performed poorly this year in part because of its short bet on Tesla.

Mr. Musk has pointed to short-sellers as a reason he is considering taking Tesla private. In a message to employees explaining his thinking, he wrote: ''As the most shorted stock in the history of the stock market, being public means that there are large numbers of people who have the incentive to attack the company.''

He isn't exactly right on his history of short-sellers. At various points in the past 10 years, the value of bets against Procter & Gamble, General Electric, Pfizer and Johnson & Johnson exceeded Tesla's high of roughly $13 billion, according to IHS Markit.

The value of short bets against Alibaba currently stands at $25 billion.

Even by the percentage of shares being shorted, it is not the highest. It's not even the biggest of 2018. So far this year, 26 companies have had a higher percentage of their stock shorted than Tesla did at its peak of 33 percent in May.

But he does have a point about the persistence of short-sellers trying to profit on Tesla's troubles. The short position in Tesla's shares has remained above $10 billion for nearly five months. In the past decade, short-sellers have not held a position valued at more than $10 billion in any other American company for more than three months, according to IHS Markit.

Betting against Tesla has been expensive. Since 2016, short-sellers collectively have lost $5 billion, as the company's shares rose 27 percent.

Even this year, amid all of Tesla's woes, betting on a decline in the company's share price has not been a winner. Its short-sellers remain down $650 million this year.

TSLA

After fatal accident, Uber’s vision of self-driving cars begins to blur

Getty Images
An Uber self-driving car drives down 5th Street on March 28, 2017 in San Francisco, California.

SAN FRANCISCO — After Dara Khosrowshahi took over as Uber's chief executive last August, he considered shutting the company's money-losing autonomous vehicle division. A visit to Pittsburgh this spring changed that.

In town for a leadership summit, Mr. Khosrowshahi and other Uber executives were briefed on the state of the company's self-driving vehicle research, which is based in Pittsburgh. The group was impressed by the progress its autonomous division had made in testing driverless cars in Pittsburgh and in Arizona, according to three people familiar with the ride-hailing company, who were not authorized to speak publicly. They left the meeting energized, convinced that Uber needed to forge ahead with self-driving cars, the people said.

But days after the summit, one of Uber's autonomous cars struck and killed a woman who was pushing a bicycle across a street in Tempe, Ariz. Video from the March 18 collision showed a distracted safety driver failing to react in time as the vehicle barreled into the pedestrian, Elaine Herzberg.

The accident threw Uber's autonomous vehicle efforts into flux, immediately forcing the suspension of its self-driving car tests in cities including Tempe, Pittsburgh and Toronto. Months later, Uber's executives are divided over what to do with the autonomous business, according to the people familiar with the company. While one camp is pushing Mr. Khosrowshahi to seek partnerships or even a potential sale of the unit, known as the Advanced Technologies Group, a rival contingent is arguing that developing self-driving technology is crucial to Uber's future, the people said.

Mr. Khosrowshahi remains undecided, the people said, though he has expressed a desire to partner with other companies on autonomous technologies. In recent months, Uber has started talking with a few auto manufacturers about potential partnerships, including supplying Uber's autonomous driving technology for use in Toyota's minivans, according to one person familiar with the talks. Toyota declined to comment.

More from The New York Times:
Alexa vs. Siri vs. Google: Which Can Carry on a Conversation Best?
Google Employees Protest Secret Work on Censored Search Engine for China
After the Cryptocurrency Boom: Hard Lessons for New Investors

The internal debates are unfolding at a time when many companies can ill afford to pause on autonomous technology given stiff competition from carmakers and other tech companies. In recent months, top engineers have left Uber's self-driving project for lucrative opportunities elsewhere. Uber's self-driving cars recently returned to the road in Pittsburgh but with human drivers at the wheel, meaning employees are driving around like any other motorist — except their vehicles are carrying hundreds of thousands of dollars in technology.

The issue of whether to retain or sell A.T.G. is complicated by Uber's stated intention to go public by the end of 2019. The company, valued at $62 billion, has racked up billions of dollars in losses since it was founded in 2009 and needs to persuade investors that it can eventually create a sustainably profitable business. The self-driving efforts, which have been losing $100 million to $200 million a quarter, do little to help that case. And Mr. Khosrowshahi has been shedding money-losing businesses since he joined Uber.

At a meeting in Pittsburgh on Aug. 8, according to a person briefed on the event, Mr. Khosrowshahi did not address what he would do with the self-driving efforts but told employees there that it ''is a big-time hardware manufacturing, software problem at scale. Lots of tech companies out there are going after this problem, but I think there are very few companies who are taking this on end-to-end at scale the way we are.''

In a statement, Uber said: ''Right now the entire team is focused on safely and responsibly returning to the road in autonomous mode. That's our No. 1 objective, and we have every confidence in the work they are doing to get us there.''

Uber first made its interest in self-driving cars public when it hired about 40 researchers and scientists from the National Robotics Engineering Center at Carnegie Mellon University in 2015. At the time, the company's chief executive was one of the founders of Uber, Travis Kalanick, who had decided to bet big on self-driving vehicles. He wanted to prepare Uber for a future when fleets of driverless cars could move passengers efficiently and safely around the clock.

In 2016, Uber acquired Otto, a self-driving truck start-up whose founders had decamped from Google. The deal later spurred a trade-secrets-theft lawsuit from Google's onetime self-driving car unit, Waymo. The case briefly went to trial this year, generating headlines and embarrassing revelations, before Uber settled with Waymo in February.

In its rush to get on the road with driverless cars, Uber also ran afoul of regulators. The company started testing its autonomous vehicles in San Francisco in 2016, without a permit from California's Division of Motor Vehicles. The state agency ordered Uber to apply for a permit, but the company refused, saying permits were not necessary since safety drivers were monitoring the cars. The D.M.V. ultimately revoked the registrations for the 16 self-driving cars that Uber was testing in the city.

By early this year, Uber's self-driving division was preparing to ramp up development, pushing its testing cars in Arizona to tally more miles. The goal, according to internal documents reviewed by The New York Times, was for Uber to win regulatory approval to start testing a self-driving car service in Arizona before the end of this year.

But the crash in March — the first known fatality involving a pedestrian and an autonomous car — altered everything. Since then, Uber has steadily narrowed the scope of its autonomous vehicle operations.

In May, Uber announced that it was shutting its driverless testing hub in Arizona and laying off 300 employees. A day later, preliminary findings from federal regulators investigating the crash confirmed what many self-driving car experts suspected: Uber's self-driving car should have detected a pedestrian with enough time to stop, but it failed to do so. Uber has begun a safety review and plans to publish its assessment in the coming months.

Mr. Khosrowshahi has started to subtly de-emphasize the company's role in developing driverless technology.

At a conference last year, he said it was a ''huge advantage'' for Uber to have its own autonomous technology while operating a global ride-sharing network. But this May, Mr. Khosrowshahi said that while Uber needed to have access to autonomous technology, it aimed to be ''neutral.'' He said Uber would be open to licensing its own technology or building around alternatives from other companies — a stark contrast to the company's previous approach of owning and operating the entire self-driving ''stack'' of technology and hardware.

And in July, Uber announced that it was closing its autonomous trucking business. The company instead said it would focus exclusively on building self-driving cars.

''For now, we need the focus of one team, with one clear objective,'' Eric Meyhofer, who leads Uber's driverless car efforts, wrote in an email to employees.

In the preceding months, some senior engineers and executives with expertise in self-driving vehicles had already left. One of those was Don Burnette, one of Otto's founders, who became the chief executive of a new self-driving company called Kodiak, which focuses on long-haul trucking.

''I really wanted to focus on the trucking problem, and there was not as much focus on that at Uber,'' Mr. Burnette said.

He added that Uber would most likely continue to pursue its vision of driverless cars because it and other companies ''have been working on it for so long, promising this for so long, and they have a tremendous amount of money behind them.''

Interested in All Things Tech? Get the Bits newsletter delivered to your inbox weekly for the latest from Silicon Valley and the technology industry.

Ford says slow-and-steady will win the self-driving car race

Ford doesn’t want to be the first company to offer self-driving cars to the public; it it wants to be the brand most synonymous with the word “trust” — at least, that’s what the company says in its self-driving safety report, which it delivered to the US Department of Transportation Thursday. The 44-page document, entitled… Continue reading Ford says slow-and-steady will win the self-driving car race