Zero DSR electric motorcycle is wickedly quick

Zero DSR electric motorcycle is wickedly quickBring on the hate mail: I love electric motorcycles.
I love their power, their torque and their stealthy silence. I love their ease of operation and their low cost of maintenance.
Although I am not alone in this, I don’t have a lot of company. Resistance to electric motorcycles is fierce.
Detractors — many of whom have not actually ridden the battery-powered machines — describe themselves as dyed-in-the-wool enthusiasts who live for the roar and rumble of a big internal combustion engine. They love the smell of the gas, the sound of the pipes and the sensation of pulsing vibration between their legs.
But they also have practical objections to electrification. Battery bikes cost too much, recharge too slowly and have insufficient range, they say. Some riders even believe electric motorcycles are more dangerous than their gasoline counterparts, because they don’t make enough noise to be heard by nearby motorists.
For two months this year I used a Zero DSR electric motorcycle as my main commuter vehicle. The experience deepened my appreciation for battery-powered transportation, and my admiration for the Zero line. But it also taught me that electric bikes aren’t for every rider, or for every ride. Even a state-of-the-art bike like the DSR could not satisfy all of a dedicated biker’s needs.
The DSR is Zero’s top model, and the company is right to be proud of it. Wickedly quick off the line, delivering spookily seamless power, the bike feels like a magic carpet ride that violates the laws of thermodynamics.
The electric battery delivers 70 horsepower and 116 pound-feet of torque on a bike that weighs about 450 pounds. That seems high, but the absence of any rotating mass — no pistons, no flywheel, no clutch — makes the bike feel almost weightless when it’s on the move. Zero says the bike will hit a top speed of 102 miles per hour.
Zero has improved its braking and suspension systems, bringing them into line with modern sport bikes. The DSR is fitted with a Bosch ABS that uses J. Juan calipers, and Showa suspension at both ends. The 17-inch rear and 19-inch front wheels wear Pirelli MT-60 tires. The combination makes the DSR feel playful but firmly planted.
Since there is no clutch or gear shift lever, operation is a breeze. Just twist the throttle and go. And because the DSR burns no fuel, requires no lubrication and is driven by a carbon belt instead of a metal chain, there is virtually no maintenance.
Riding without noise, heat or vibration is strangely liberating. Without those things occupying the senses, I feel like I can hear more, see more and even smell more than when I ride a traditional bike.
One night on the DSR I became concerned about a squeaky sound accompanying my ride up a Hollywood canyon road that I’d ridden dozens of times before. I finally pulled over, worried that I had a bad bearing or a defective belt. Only when I stopped did I realize I was hearing frogs and crickets from a nearby creek.
Commuting, I felt confident in traffic and comfortable lane-splitting on the freeway. Somehow the DSR felt lighter, more nimble and even thinner than my other motorcycles — though in reality it is not. I found that, when I needed to run an errand and had the option of the DSR or another bike, I almost invariably chose the DSR. It just seemed simpler, somehow.
The exception? Longer rides. Zero boasts that the DSR, fitted with the optional Power Tank accessory, can go 220 city miles or 110 freeway miles on a single battery charge.
That was not my experience, and will probably not be the experience of anyone who does not ride this kind of bike very conservatively. Though I didn’t drain the battery down to its last bit of juice, my range would have been something more like half what Zero advertises.
Granted, I was really enjoying the terrific torque and acceleration, which meant I was riding at the rate of about 120 miles to the tank, with mixed city and highway riding.
Zero boasts, too, that the DSR, when fitted with the necessary fast-charging hardware, can be refueled in as little as two hours, at the rate of 103 riding miles per charging hour.
Because I was commuting, I didn’t test that. But arriving home in the evening, plugging the DSR into a standard household outlet, I observed recharge rates of about 6 to 8 riding miles per hour. Plugging in overnight, I always got up the next morning to a full tank, with plenty of juice to get me where I needed to go.
But that meant a day ride to Big Bear, or even a spirited run up the Angeles Crest Highway to Newcomb’s Ranch or Wrightwood, was problematic. I could get there all right, but would I find a place to plug in, and how long would it take to recharge sufficiently to get home? I took a gas-powered bike on those jaunts.
Zero puts the cost of charging its electric bikes at $1.50 to $2 per tank, and says some of its machines get the fuel efficiency equivalent of 403 miles per gallon. Studies have shown that the cost of owning and operating an electric motorcycle may make it cheaper than comparable gas-powered bikes.
But the cost of entry is steep. Zero’s least expensive machines start as low as $8,495. The basic DSR starts at $10,995. The model I rode, outfitted with a variety of options, would retail well above that, at just above $19,000, before tax, license and delivery.
Some government incentives would offset that, and could include a federal tax credit of up to $1,500 and a California state rebate of $900.
There will still be those who, until they ride one, will view electric bikes as a passing fad. If so, they’re passing in good company.
BMW, Yamaha and others have put substantial resources behind their electric scooter programs. Alta Motors’ motocross bikes are beating internal combustion machines wherever they’re allowed to compete. And Harley-Davidson, which recently made a substantial investment in Alta, is coming to market with its electric LiveWire superbike and half a dozen other new electric machines.
The future isn’t coming. It’s here.
Read or Share this story: https://detne.ws/2KVFw78

Could Musk's tweet about taking Tesla private lead to legal trouble?

Could Musk's tweet about taking Tesla private lead to legal trouble?Nine words tweeted by Tesla CEO Elon Musk Tuesday afternoon raised questions for the outspoken auto executive.
At 12:48 p.m. Musk tweeted: “Am considering taking Tesla private at $420. Funding secured.”
The tweet caused a stir in the stock market. Tesla shares spiked 11 percent to close at $379.57 after trading was halted for part of the afternoon while investors awaited clarification. The stock's record high was $389.61 on Sept. 18, 2017.
But the tweet could be in violation of state and federal laws, said a former federal prosecutor.
“You’re not allowed to issue misleading information that investors could act on, and it looks like investors acted on it,” said Peter Henning, a professor at Wayne State University Law School specializing in securities law.
Read more:
Musk: Tesla hit weekly Model 3 production goal
Tesla CEO's tweets cause stir in Flint
Legally, shareholders could sue Musk for a breach of fiduciary responsibility, said Henning. If the tweet gives an impression that Musk is trying to “stampede the board,” that’s a violation of state fiduciary duty of directors, Henning said.
“You’re not allowed to strong-arm the directors, even if you are a 20 percent stakeholder” as Musk is, Henning said.
If the Securities and Exchange Commission believes Musk's tweet misled shareholders, the SEC could deem it a violation of anti-fraud prohibition in the federal securities law, said Henning.
“I suspect the corporate lawyers are scrambling right now and hoping the SEC doesn’t go after him and the company, because it could be viewed as a statement from Tesla,” said Henning. “If it misleads investors, the SEC can bring a case even if no one’s been harmed.”
The SEC in 2013 did say that companies can use social media such as Facebook and Twitter to announce key information so long as investors have been alerted about which social media will be used to disseminate the information.
Musk offered some clarification to his tweet later, saying the “only reason why this is not certain is that it’s contingent on a shareholder vote.”
Musk, whose tweets initially caused confusion as some investors questioned whether he had been hacked, later confirmed his thinking through Tesla's official website.
“I think this is the best path forward,” he said in an email to employees, further clarifying that “a final decision has not yet been made, but the reason for doing this is all about creating the environment for Tesla to operate best.”
The explanation could have been late, said Henning. Corporate governance requires a company officer to first notify the board of directors of any deals, then negotiate a deal with the board.
“The tweet is potentially misleading. It didn’t give the kind of details that shareholders would want. The key detail being that it’s not a done deal. It sounded like, 'We’ve got the financing and we’re done.' That’s not how it works.”
He added, “If an analyst said, 'Musk should take the company private,' people would shrug their shoulders. It’s much different when the CEO says it. The law is protective of shareholders. You have to get them the best deal, and whether $420 is a fair price or not? We don’t know.”
Contact Jamie L. LaReau at 313-222-2149 or jlareau@freepress.com. Nathan Bomey of USA Today contributed to this report.
Read or Share this story: https://on.freep.com/2nmksgG

Pace Of Battery Development May Leave Latest Tech In The Dust

53 M BY DOMENICK YONEY To the victors go the spoils We hear about improvements in battery technology pretty regularly, and no wonder. With the potential for a superior chemistry to result in billions of dollars of revenue, teams around the world — in commercial enterprises and universities alike — are hard at work trying to create… Continue reading Pace Of Battery Development May Leave Latest Tech In The Dust

Elon Musk Details ‘Excruciating’ Personal Toll of Tesla Turmoil

Elon Musk was at home in Los Angeles, struggling to maintain his composure. “This past year has been the most difficult and painful year of my career,” he said. “It was excruciating.” The year has only gotten more intense for Mr. Musk, the chairman and chief executive of the electric-car maker Tesla, since he abruptly… Continue reading Elon Musk Details ‘Excruciating’ Personal Toll of Tesla Turmoil

PROTON AFTER SALES SERVICE COMPETITION REWARDING SKILLED TALENTS

Kota Kinabalu, 15 August 2018 – PROTON After Sales Service Competition 2018 (“the Competition”) is a platform for all after sales personnel around the country to showcase their ability and quality of work in handling customers’ cars. As part of PROTON’s talent management and development initiatives, winners will be rewarded with cash prizes and incentive trip to Shanghai, China worth RM50, 000.
For pre-qualifying round in East Malaysia, participants from PROTON dealers and branches in Sabah and Sarawak were tested to prove their skills, speed and accuracy in their area of expertise.
Sharpening Skills for First Proton SUV and Future Models

“Throughout the Competition, our technicians will compete against each other, helping them to sharpen their skills. Ultimately, this assists to build the quality of our after sales services and take it to a higher level to be on par with global standards. We believe our after sales service personnel are ready to receive the coming of the first Proton..

After vehicle fires: Koreans want to sue BMW boss Kruger

BMW boss Harald Krüger A lawsuit is to be filed against the group leader in Korea. (Photo: AP) Munich, TokyoThe pressure on BMW growing in South Korea: On Friday, a law firm in Seoul wants to file a collective complaint against the carmaker. Lawyer Jason Ha said he also filed a lawsuit against the company’s… Continue reading After vehicle fires: Koreans want to sue BMW boss Kruger

For Tesla, ‘going dark’ might not be as easy as just turning off the lights

Simon Dawson | Bloomberg | Getty Images
Elon Musk, billionaire, co-founder and chief executive officer of Tesla Motors Inc.

Elon Musk still hasn't made a formal proposal to take Tesla private, an idea he floated last week in a series of tweets he has since attempted to clarify.

Many questions remain about his plan, chief among them how he would pull off taking private a $60 billion publicly traded company.

Lawyers and advisors tell CNBC it's not going to be as simple as “going dark,” as smaller companies have done in a big wave in the decade since the financial crisis. In order to pull that off, a company has to have fewer than 300 shareholders (or 500 in some cases). The process involves filing a few forms with the Securities and Exchange Commission and removing the shares from the exchange where they were listed.

It has been an escape for hundreds of companies over the last decade that found themselves crippled by the pressures of having to meet rigorous public financial disclosure requirements. But Tesla is a big company, and removing itself from the public market is a lot more complicated.

“No one has done it on this large a scale,” said Peter Bible, chief risk officer of EisnerAmper and a former chief accounting officer of General Motors.

Usually, the investing public waits impatiently for the next hot initial public offering, but Silicon Valley's tech elite has been disappointing those expectations lately. Many are content to stay private. CB Insights counts 260 $1 billion-plus “unicorns” with a combined private valuation of $840 billion. Last year, there were 160 IPOs versus 486 in 1999 at the height of the dot-com frenzy, according to Statista.

Constant pressure from shareholders and analysts about near-term performance was enough to drive companies like Dell and Tibco to move in the opposite direction and go private, but through the traditional buyout route where shareholders are cashed out.

Tibco, a business intelligence software maker, delisted from Nasdaq in 2014 and went private through a $4.3 billion deal with Vista Equity Partners. “Private provides you with the leeway you do't have in a public setting,” its chief technology officer told Britain's CIO magazine at the time.

Tesla debuted on the Nasdaq in 2010, raising $226 million as its shares jumped 41 percent on their first day of trading, and it has returned to the market several times since then issuing more shares. Musk's personal stake in the company has risen in value from $512 million at the time of the IPO to $12.8 billion.

But the electric car company's founder and CEO has complained that being publicly traded invites distracting focus on short-term financial goals and makes Tesla the target of traders who attack the company in order to profit from a decline in its shares.

How it's done

Simply going dark is a multistep process. The exchanges need several days notice of the plan, and the public has to be informed at the same time. Then forms are filed with the SEC, one to notify it of the delisting and another to deregister the shares if the company has 300 or fewer shareholders. But if the shareholders aren't bought out with cash, the shares continue to trade, moving over to the more thinly traded over-the-counter market.

Going private requires cash to buy out the minority shareholders, usually through a merger, tender offer or reverse stock split.

But Musk's proposal adds a complicating factor.

He has said he wants to preserve a broad ownership of Tesla as a private company. That might be impossible for the mom and pop investors in the stock now who don't qualify to invest in private companies as accredited investors. If they want to keep their ownership, it might have to be through a special purpose fund, something Musk has mentioned.

And that special purpose fund might have to be publicly traded, Morningstar's David Whiston said.

“Issues around regulatory approval come to mind because it is unclear how Tesla will allow retail investors who are not accredited investors to own stakes in a private Tesla,” he wrote in a note this week. “That issue is why we think the special-purpose vehicle Musk pointed to in the Aug. 7 email may have to be publicly traded.”

Tesla said Tuesday its board has set up a special committee to examine Musk's idea. Lawyers for the committee and the company have been hired, and Musk has tweeted that he has his own advisors, including the private equity firm Silver Lake, which is said to be interested in a possible investment.

The special board committee, including directors Brad Buss, Robyn Denholm and Linda Johnson Rice, hadn't reached any conclusions about “the advisability or feasibility” of a transaction and that it could consider alternatives, Tesla said Tuesday. Shareholders would also have to vote on a transaction, lawyers and advisors said.

That's another complicating factor, lawyers said. There's no guarantee that enough shareholders will agree or that enough will want to sell their shares at Musk's suggested $420 price to get Tesla's shareholder count low enough to deregister the shares. Whiston estimates about 40 percent of the shareholders might take the money, and that would cost about $28.7 billion.

Depending on state law, he'd have to get a super majority of shareholders (in Delaware, it's 90 percent) to be able to squeeze out any holdouts, lawyers said. But Musk has said there will be no forced sales.

Its biggest investors, aside from Musk himself, are mutual funds and money managers in addition to China's Tencent and Saudi Arabia's sovereign wealth fund. Collectively this group holds about 66 percent of the shares. About 17 percent are owned by investors who are too small (either in the amount of Tesla they own or the size of their portfolios) to have to report their stakes. Musk has said he believes two-thirds of Tesla's shareholders will stick with it as a private company.

The deal could turn out to be as unique as the collection of space transportation, electric automobile, high-speed transportation and solar power generation projects Musk has cobbled together in his business empire.

“There is a recipe for going private, but like everything else, Elon Musk does it his own way,” said Barry Genkin, a partner at law firm Blank Rome. “He hasn't put any meat on the bones and everyone is scratching their heads about what he means.”

Bill: Government demands toleration of private charging stations

The Federal government has its design for promoting private charging stations for electric cars submitted. Both tenants and owners receive a legal claim. But it can be very expensive. A report  from Friedhelm old man August 17, 2018, 11:43 am The government wants to facilitate the installation of private charging stations. (Image: Mary Turner /… Continue reading Bill: Government demands toleration of private charging stations

Vinfast, Siemens sign deals for electric bus manufacturing

They are key deals to begin the process of building a value chain for eco-friendly public transportation vehicles manufacturing.  The first line of electric buses is expected to debut in late 2019.  Vinfast is also developing other eco-friendly personal vehicles such as electric motorbikes and automobiles, and autos (sedan, SUV) that run on petrol meeting… Continue reading Vinfast, Siemens sign deals for electric bus manufacturing

A choked up Elon Musk says his health has suffered and that he believes ‘the worst is yet to come’

Elon Musk was at home in Los Angeles, struggling to maintain his composure. “This past year has been the most difficult and painful year of my career,” he said. “It was excruciating.” The year has only gotten more intense for Mr. Musk, the chairman and chief executive of the electric-car maker Tesla, since he abruptly… Continue reading A choked up Elon Musk says his health has suffered and that
he believes ‘the worst is yet to come’