Self-driving cars are a central part of our vision for reducing individual car ownership, creating safer streets, and alleviating congestion. Alongside providing on-demand options for shared rides, electric bikes, scooters, and transit, self-driving cars in the Lyft app provide another way for people to get around reliably without needing to own a car. One year… Continue reading One Year In, 50,000 Self-Driving Rides Later
Tag: Autonomous
Here’s how a Fiat Chrysler-Renault merger could spark some mega auto deals
2017 Chrysler Pacifica BraunAbility is on display at the 109th Annual Chicago Auto Show at McCormick Place in Chicago, Illinois on February 9, 2017.Raymond Boyd | Getty ImagesFiat Chrysler's (FCA) proposed 50/50 merger with Renault could pave the way for a long-awaited M&A (merger and acquisition) boom in the sector, analysts have told CNBC.
The tie-up looks to strengthen FCA's position in electric vehicle technologies but would also create the third largest global automaker by production, behind Volkswagen and Toyota.
It's been lauded by many analysts, including Philippe Houchois, autos equity research analyst at Jefferies, who published in a note that there is nothing to dislike in a proposed merger that offers scope for synergies and restructuring.
“(It's) hard to disagree with the logic (of the deal) and with net synergies. We are positive on both shares with proforma combination still at low end of sector,” Houchois said.
Gaetan Toulemonde, autos equity research analyst at Deutsche Bank, said in a note that it would allow both groups to share platforms and “capture economies of scale at a time when the industry needs to invest massively in CO2 reduction (and) autonomous driving.”
VIDEO3:0103:01Renault would boost Fiat Chrysler in electric vehiclesClosing BellThe auto industry has long promised consolidation but has never fully delivered on market expectations. Now, under mounting pressure from structural changes including new technologies and stricter emissions standards, we could finally be on the brink of an M&A bonanza in the sector.
“There is certainly scope for a lot of co-operation throughout the industry, either through a full merger such as Renault-FCA or just sharing R&D or sourcing,” said Anna-Marie Baisden, Head of Autos, Macro Research at Fitch Solutions.
And Arndt Ellinghorst, the head of global automotive research at investment banking firm Evercore ISI, told CNBC he “wouldn't rule anything out at this stage as we know from public statements that various players are open to consolidation.”
Daimler and BMW recently struck an agreement to pool their mobility services to create a new global player providing sustainable urban mobility for customers. They have also joined forces on autonomous driving. If they are forced to compete with another mega automaker in FCA-Renault, Daimler and BMW could perhaps even explore deepening their ties.
“The recent FCA-Renault announcement confirms that the auto industry is changing and that cooperation will be one of the keys for future success. We are monitoring the next steps closely and certainly see the possibility that the merger can also create opportunities and potentials,” wrote a Daimler spokesperson in an email to CNBC.
VIDEO3:0703:07Cramer: Auto companies have too many employeesSquawk on the StreetAngus Tweedie, auto equity research analyst at Citi agrees that closer collaboration between Daimler and BMW would seem very logical given their similar target markets and therefore commonality of components. Areas of difficulty would be the shareholder structure and there also seems some opposition at both companies from an operational perspective. Like all European deals, headcount reductions would be difficult, Tweedie added.
Ford and Volkswagen have already forged a global alliance to develop commercial vans and medium-sized pickups together and have signed a memorandum of understanding to investigate collaboration on autonomous vehicles, mobility services and electric vehicles and have started to explore opportunities.
On the prospect of a bigger deal down the line for the two giants, Fitch's Baisden said there was appealing logic.
“Their strategies both focus on EVs and autonomy in the medium to long term and so with a challenging market that threatens their income, it would make sense.”
And don't forget about Peugeot. Multiple reports suggest the French carmaker was interested in doing a deal with Fiat Chrysler. If FCA consummates this deal with Renault, Peugeot will have to look elsewhere for merger opportunities.
Getty ImagesSome market participants suggest a tie-up between Peugeot and Jaguar Land Rover (JLR) could make sense.
“I can see how JLR would be an appealing partner in giving PSA exposure to the premium segment and also the US, which it is looking to return to,” said Baisden.
JLR has been struggling recently, posting losses in the first three quarters of 2017 before swinging to a small profit in the final quarter of the year. Further, PSA's chief Carlos Tavares has successfully turned around the Opel Vauxhall brand he bought from General Motors in 2017, demonstrating his ability to restructure and integrate new businesses.
Ellinghorst also wouldn't rule out Peugeot coming back for FCA: “They have shown interest in FCA before. (But) we must see how Renault and the French government reacts first.”
The European auto sector rallied on the back of FCA's proposal to merge with Renault earlier this week. Market watchers highlight that the positive share price moves show how undervalued carmakers are.
“There has been talk of consolidation for years. Now at the peak of the cycle, the market welcomes the fact that there is some action with regards to consolidation,” Ellinghorst told CNBC.
Peugeot and BMW did not respond to CNBC's request for comment.
Lyft has completed 55,000 self-driving rides in Las Vegas
Sponsored Links Roberto Baldwin / Engadget One year ago, Lyft launched its self-driving ride service in Las Vegas. Today, the company announced its 30-vehicle fleet has made 55,000 trips. That makes it the largest commercial program of its kind in the US. Unsurprisingly, Lyft says it’s thrilled. “So far, we’ve been very pleased with what… Continue reading Lyft has completed 55,000 self-driving rides in Las Vegas
VW is driving forward factory redevelopment in Zwickau: 1500 new robots for Germany’s first e-car factory
Volkswagen Volkswagen’s Future Hope ID.3 Volkswagen drives the Conversion of his work in Zwickau, Saxony to the first pure E-car factory of Germany Ahead. From mid-2020, only electric vehicles will be built on site. It starts with the ID.3, the end of 2019 roll off the line. “It will be converted for a new era,”… Continue reading VW is driving forward factory redevelopment in Zwickau: 1500 new robots for Germany’s first e-car factory
AEye Team Profile: Jim Robnett
On June 5th, AEye’s VP of Automotive Business Development, Jim Robnett, will give a Keynote Address entitled “Brains vs. Brawn: The Quest for Artificial Perception” at TU-Automotive Detroit.
A 25-year automotive veteran, Jim Robnett is charged with building AEye’s partnerships with leading OEMs and Tier 1s. Robnett is a proven executive and technology leader with a strong track record of driving product innovation, development, and revenue across automotive and industrial markets. Prior to joining AEye, he was VP of Strategic Partnerships for Luminar. He has also held executive leadership positions at NNG, Fiat Chrysler Automobiles, HERE, SiriusXM, and Denso. Robnett earned his Bachelor’s Degree in Mechanical Engineering at the University of Michigan, and his MBA from Michigan State University.
We sat down with Jim to learn more about what sparked his interest in autonomous vehicles, the burgeoning relationship between Detroit and Silicon Valley, and his all time favorite musician.
Q: You have extensive experience in the automotive industry. What was it about autonomous vehicles (AVs) that shifted your interest and drew you into this space?
For the last 10-15 years, I worked in the infotainment sector of the automotive industry. This included anything from maps and navigation, telematics, connected services, traffic, etc. Going back 5-10 years ago, there was a lot of innovation in that space. The innovation continues today, but at a much slower rate, and that’s because now, the main source of infotainment in the car comes from the cell phone. So, the main source of infotainment innovation in the automotive industry is focused on incorporating the cell phone into the vehicle. This will change with better embedded connectivity in the vehicle, but this is the current trend.
At the same time that the infotainment sector was slowing down, ADAS, advanced safety and autonomous vehicle innovation was picking up. Having grown up in Detroit, witnessing my dad’s 30 year career at GM, I wanted to continue to be a part of the incredible legacy of innovation in the automotive industry. Advanced ADAS solutions and, eventually, fully autonomous vehicles, will be the most important transportation technology innovation event in my lifetime – and I knew that I needed to be a part of it.
Q: How have you seen the Detroit automotive culture interact with Silicon Valley technology culture? Do you view it as more of a collision or a co-mingling?
It’s interesting to see the mix of cultures, because I spend half of my time in each. There is a definite merging and the two co-exist, but there is a sense of friction, still.
I consider myself, and my role, as a bridge between the two cultures, especially since I grew up in the automotive industry, but feel very comfortable in the emerging technology space.
AEye is the perfect example of a “disruptor” to the industry. Making cars is very difficult. To be successful, we have to take the best aspects of the history and experience of the Detroit culture with the innovation and velocity of change of Silicon Valley. The companies that combine these two cultures the best will not only benefit from both worlds, but and will emerge as the industry leaders.
Q: You sing and play guitar in a band – what is your favorite music genre to play? To listen to? Who is your favorite musician?
I didn’t start playing guitar until after college, but once I started, I almost immediately formed a band with some buddies. That band (in different versions) has been going strong for about 25 years. We write a lot of our own songs – I’d describe it as kind of punk/rock and roll. In terms of my own taste in music, I listen to almost everything, but I especially love the Rolling Stones. And that’s because they’ve survived after so many decades and are still rocking and innovating. Their longevity and creativity is what interests me the most. As to my favorite musician? Keith Richards is my hero.
Connect with AEye at TU-Automotive Detroit! Learn more here.
AEye Team Profile: Jim Robnett — AEye Team Profile: Dr. Allan SteinhardtAEye Expands Business Development and Customer Success Team to Support Growing Network of Global Partners and CustomersAEye Advisory Board Profile: Luke SchneiderAEye Team Profile: Indu VijayanAEye Advisory Board Profile: Tim ShipleAEye Advisory Board Profile: Elliot GarbusLG Electronics and AEye Announce Strategic Partnership to Address Sensing and Perception Needs of ADAS MarketAEye Advisory Board Profile: Scott PfotenhauerBlair LaCorte Named President of AEyeThe Future of Autonomous Vehicles: Part I – Think Like a Robot, Perceive Like a Human
Ridecell and Dataspeed partner to enhance autonomous vehicle safety – Geospatial World
USA: Ridecell Inc., the leading platform for shared and autonomous mobility operators, and Dataspeed Inc., a globally established drive-by-wire solution provider, announced a strategic partnership to enhance autonomous vehicle (AV) safety. The companies will begin leveraging each other’s technology and testing new technologies in real world conditions to improve vehicle safety. “Dataspeed is a leading provider… Continue reading Ridecell and Dataspeed partner to enhance autonomous vehicle safety – Geospatial World
Uber lost another $1B last quarter
Uber posted losses of $1 billion on revenue of $3.1 billion for the first quarter of 2019 in what was the company’s first earnings report as a public company. Gross bookings rose 34% to $14.6 billion in the same time period, as Uber Eats continued to show notable growth. Amid both positive and negative stock… Continue reading Uber lost another $1B last quarter
Fiat Chrysler’s $40 billion proposed merger with Renault is no done deal
The logos of automobile companies (LtoR) Abarth, Lancia, Fiat, Alfa Romeo and Jeep are pictured at the entrance to the Fiat Chrysler Automobiles (FCA) at the Fiat Mirafiori car plant on May 27, 2019 in Turin, northern Italy.Marco Bertorello | AFP | Getty ImagesFiat Chrysler's proposed $40 billion merger with Renault, which would create the world's third-largest automaker, is far from a done deal.
The merger, announced Monday, is fraught with “significant execution risks” that could scuttle it altogether, according to Moody's Investors Service. If the deal gets done at all, it will take a minimum of a year and up to 18 months to complete, according to an executive at Fiat Chrysler briefed on the negotiations.
The companies both have complex business models — particularly French automaker Renault's alliance with Japan's Nissan Motor and Mitsubishi — and powerful executive teams, which complicates choosing leaders for the combined company, said Joe Phillippi, president of AutoTrends Consulting.
The deal comes at a critical time for the automakers. Global sales are slowing after nine years of growth, and the industry is trying to come up with extraordinary amounts of cash to invest in autonomous driving and electric vehicles.
'Historic deal'Jim Press, the former deputy CEO for Chrysler Group, called it a “historic deal” that will likely be followed by others in the industry.
“The consolidation in the global auto business is something that has to happen,” he said on CNBC's “Closing Bell ” on Tuesday. “The pressure on profits is increasing at a time when the investments required for the new technology of autonomous vehicles and electric transition, all of that is adding a significant burden on investments.”
The Italian-American automaker has offered Renault a 50-50 merger of equals that would create an 11-member board split equally between Renault and Fiat Chrysler, with one seat going to Nissan. Fiat Chrysler's shareholders would receive a special dividend of 2.5 billion euros (about $2.78 billion) to account for Fiat Chrysler's higher market value. Existing shareholders of both automakers would get half of the combined company.
Fiat Chrysler said the deal would save an average of roughly 5 billion euros (about $5.57 billion) a year without closing any plants, which is an important detail that should help smooth the deal with unions, politicians and regulators. France's Finance Minister Bruno le Maire told RTL radio on Tuesday he wants “four guarantees,” including “the preservation of industrial jobs and sites in France.”
Shaky groundThe deal is significantly complicated by the French automaker's role in the Renault-Nissan-Mitsubishi Alliance. Collectively, the alliance forms the world's second-largest automotive group, with 2018 sales of 10.8 million vehicles. Renault merging with Fiat Chrysler would create the world's third-largest automaker, with 8.7 million in annual sales.
The alliance itself is on shaky ground since its longtime chief, Carlos Ghosn, was arrested in November in what many consider a corporate coup orchestrated by Nissan, which has accused him of a variety of financial misdeeds.
“It's regressing fast,” according to a high-level executive with the alliance, who asked not to be identified because the internal discussions are private. He said the operation “could come apart” in the months ahead, with Fiat Chrysler's merger proposal adding to the ongoing friction.
The alliance, initially between Renault and Nissan, was formed 20 years ago when the French automaker invested $5.4 billion to keep the then-failing Japanese manufacturer from going under. Renault took a controlling stake in Nissan and subsequently increased that to 43.4%. The Japanese carmaker, in turn, has a 15% stake in its ally. Over those two decades, Renault and Nissan have claimed to develop a closely interwoven business relationship, with the two sharing platforms, engines and other technology as well as parts purchasing, among other things.
Carlos Ghosn, former chairman of Nissan Motor Co., leaves his lawyer's office in Tokyo, Japan, on Thursday, May 23, 2019.Toru Hanai | Bloomberg | Getty ImagesNot as hopedGhosn is a powerful and charismatic auto executive who wore multiple hats up until his arrest — he ran the alliance, was chairman of Nissan and CEO of Renault. Because of the structure of the alliance, however, the two companies haven't achieved all the benefits executives had hoped, Ghosn has previously said. Their engineering units, for instance, still operate largely autonomously, said the alliance executive.
That's partly why in the year leading up to his arrest, Ghosn was trying to orchestrate a full merger between Renault and Nissan that many industry executives believe may have contributed to Nissan's move to have him prosecuted.
Nissan has made it clear it doesn't want to merge with Renault, rejecting another merger attempt by the French automaker last month. The new proposal from Fiat Chrysler would effectively shelve those plans. Nissan and Mitsubishi would get about 1 billion euros ($1.11 billion) a year in “synergies” stemming from the merger, Fiat Chrysler said Monday.
Yokohama meetingExecutives from the three alliance companies gathered at Nissan's headquarters in Yokohama on Wednesday for a prescheduled meeting. Japan's Nikkei newspaper reported that Nissan wasn't opposed to the deal, while noting that “many details need to be worked out,” citing an unnamed Nissan executive who attended the meeting.
Since Ghosn's arrest, Nissan CEO Hiroto Saikawa has met with senior officials from Renault on several occasions. Both sides have attempted to put a positive face on their relationship. But Saikawa has stressed internally that there is no interest on the Japanese automaker's part for a full merger right now, the alliance executive said, adding that “hubris and arrogance” on the part of “senior executives at both companies” are making it increasingly hard to hold the group together.
Ghosn actually initiated merger talks in 2008 between Renault and Nissan and what was just Chrysler when it was teetering on insolvency, said a former Chrysler executive involved in those negotiations. The effort failed because of the U.S. automaker's troubled finance unit during the financial crisis.
Makes sense “The tie-up between Chrysler and Renault made sense in 2008,” Press said in a separate interview. He should know, as vice chairman and co-president of Chrysler at that time. “It makes even more sense today given the market strength of Fiat Chrysler [in SUVs and pickups] and their similar cultures that would make them uniquely suited to work well together.” Press now heads the RML Automotive dealer network.
One of the questions the proposed merger raises is how the new management structure would shake out. The consensus sees Fiat Chrysler Chairman John Elkann filling the same role at the combined company, say industry analysts and executives. Elkann is heir to the Fiat founding family, the Agnellis, who currently hold a 29% stake of the automaker's stock and 44% of its voting rights. Elkann played a critical role in the merger.
“He has the phone book,” said one of the executives briefed on the negotiations. Elkann is also critical in helping to smooth approval from the French government, which holds a 15% stake in Renault, these people said.
Renault's chairman, Jean-Dominique Senard, is the most likely candidate for CEO of the combined company, industry analysts and executives say.
Fight over No. 3There could be a fight over the No. 3 role, president, between the two companies' current CEOs: Thierry Bollore at Renault and Mike Manley at Fiat Chrysler.
Manley handled much of the nitty-gritty details of the deal, the executive briefed on the negotiations said. There were some questions raised in the press, though, about the timing of his elevation shortly after former CEO Sergio Marchionne's untimely death last summer. Manley currently has strong support from the automaker's board, industry analysts and executives say.
Bollore was a longtime colleague of Ghosn's, though that currently carries far less weight than it would have a year ago. European newspapers reported that Bollore's own promotion was also controversial, following Ghosn's unexpected arrest last year, and caused some tension on the board.
Unanswered questionsHow the operations and production might come together is a question yet to be answered. Among other things, would the merged entity maintain the broad portfolio of brands now in place? As part of the five-year plan outlined by Marchionne in June 2018, Fiat Chrysler's two namesake brands were set to scale back significantly, leading many analysts to question how much longer they might be around. In recent months, with sales continuing to weaken, many have begun to speculate that the Fiat marque could soon be pulled out of the U.S. market.
The other uncertainty is Alfa Romeo. Under the current plan — as with the prior one — that Italian marque is getting billions of dollars in product development funding. But sales of new models such as the Giulia sedan and Stelvio SUV have been disappointing.
“At least for now, we intend to continue following the five-year plan,” said the Fiat Chrysler executive. What might happen after a merger is another matter.
Surprise dealThe move by Fiat Chrysler to propose a merger with Renault caught many observers by surprise. After being appointed to replace Marchionne last year, Fiat Chrysler's Manley appeared to be downplaying his mentor's push to find a partner.
“I think partnerships and alliances are important and will continue,” Manley said during a media roundtable at the North American International Auto Show in January. “If there [are] ways we can get better return for our capital, if there [..
Waymo bringing self-driving trucks to Phoenix area freeways
Original Article
Adam Jonas’s Thoughts on Tesla: Facts or Fantasies?
Invest
Electric Cars
Electric Car Benefits
Electric Car Sales
Solar Energy Rocks
RSS
Advertise
Privacy Policy
Autonomous Vehicles
Published on May 29th, 2019 |
by Peter Forman (aka Papafox)
Adam Jonas’s Thoughts on Tesla: Facts or Fantasies?
Twitter
LinkedIn
Facebook
May 29th, 2019 by Peter Forman (aka Papafox)
The trading week of May 20–24 was not kind to Tesla. The stock dropped more than 20 points, which translates into a loss of some $3.5 billion in market capitalization. The primary reason for the plunge was investor reactions to a full-court press of negative comments from analysts and the media.
A central figure in the week’s vortex of negativity was Morgan Stanley analyst Adam Jonas. Not only had he posted recent reductions in Tesla stock’s price targets, but he went so far as to host an investor’s conference call, aimed at institutional investors, to share his negative impressions of Tesla with those companies holding the lion’s share of the company’s stock (TSLA).
How well did Jonas portray Tesla’s prospects? We have a unique opportunity to judge his presentation because just one day later, on May 23, Elon Musk issued an email to employees in which he shared critical information about second quarter vehicle production and deliveries. Armed with actual data, let’s look at the claims in Jonas’s investor call and judge his points on a scale of Hit or Miss.
Adam Jonas position
Reality Check
Hit or Miss?
Tesla is burning money.
Tesla had operating cash flow of $1.4 billion in Q3 2018 and $1.2 billion in Q4 2018. Q1 of 2019 had substantial negative cash flow, but Q2 2018 deliveries in the vicinity of Q4 2018’s would produce positive cash flows again, and expectations are that Q3 2019 will be better than Q2. One quarter does not a money burner make, especially when Musk warned early that logistics of beginning international deliveries in Q1 would lead to an additional 10,000 vehicles in transit during the quarter.
Miss
Supply of Tesla vehicles is greater than demand
Tesla’s production of Model 3 in Q1 2019 was constrained by the availability of Panasonic produced cells. Message boards indicate brisk demand for all Tesla vehicles at the moment. With M3 production at 900/day, trying to push 1000/day, production is the bottleneck in Q2, not demand. Q2 increase in production is possible because of shift to standard range M3s, which use fewer cells. No standard range M3s were shipping to Europe or China in Q1. Musk’s email explained how 50,000 new orders had come in already during the first 7 weeks of Q2, suggesting continued growth of organic demand.
Miss
Nobody cares about Model Y
In Q1, Model 3 was the highest grossing vehicle of any type in California. As Jonas points out, the sedan market is dying in America. It’s being replaced with the CUV and SUV market, which is why Elon Musk predicts Model Y will outsell S,X, and 3 combined. If you review the Model Y presentation, you’ll see how Musk downplayed the vehicle (likely to avoid distracting from Model 3 orders during the long wait for Model Y). Moreover, the Tesla Semi is a commercial vehicle with extremely attractive economics and it, too, begins production in in 2020.
Miss by a mile
China is a big concern
Model 3 begins production in China late this year, and the vehicle will be tariff-free to Chinese customers, regardless of trade war status. Chinese automotive expert Michael Dunne appeared on the May 26 edition of Autoline This Week and explained how well positioned Tesla is for success in China with its factory, huge support from Shanghai’s government, and the Chinese being big fans of Tesla and Elon Musk. Meanwhile, teardown expert Sandy Munro says the China-built Model 3 SR should generate 25% gross margins. Current orders in China for long-range Model 3s with tariffs attached does not provide a good basis for judging demand for the more affordable Model 3s soon to be built in the country.
Miss
Tesla is no longer a growth story
To solve the battery cell bottleneck, installation of three fast cell production lines at GF1 and transition to local labor will help in the short run. In long run, changing to a dry electrode battery technology pioneered by recently-acquired Maxwell Technologies will allow many times the production within the existing factory space. These cheaper and longer-lasting batteries will allow Model Y and Semi to move forward with adequate cell availability and cost reductions of about 20%. The exciting lineup of future Tesla models, along with GF3 coming on line, will allow substantial growth in 2020. Musk’s email suggests that Tesla has a chance in Q2 to exceed the 90,700 vehicles delivered in Q4 2018 if production allows.
Miss by a country mile
The problem with the Jonas report on Tesla was not one or two isolated points, but rather a pattern of over-the-top negativity that completely distorts the company’s attractiveness as an investment.
The publication of these points of negativity brought up by Jonas damaged Tesla’s stock price because the public expects analysts from a firm with the stature of Morgan Stanley to be capable of somewhat accurately analyzing a company that falls within their specialty. Moreover, Jonas went after Tesla’s biggest investors with this presentation, the people who could most damage Tesla’s stock price. He called Tesla “a distressed-credit story and restructuring story,” thus sounding his alarm as loudly as possible.
The fallout for Tesla was greater than what one would expect from just a bad analyst’s opinion, however. In a note released by Jonas earlier in the week, he dropped his bear-case price target for Tesla from $97 to a mere $10 (yet didn’t change the overall price target). This amount was so far removed from reality that even Musk’s nemesis Jim Cramer called the number “really insane.” Nonetheless, that $10 target received enormous traction as reporters of every type picked up and repeated the $10 price target story. Predictably, a copycat “really insane” worst-case target soon followed, this time from Citigroup, as it gave a $36 target which was likewise picked up by reporters. Such ridiculously low targets turned out to be a truly effective form of FUD, however, and those of us who share Tesla stock information with friends and family members were deluged with questions from worried stockholders ready to sell. If the goal was to drive down the stock price, it worked.
The calamity of a seriously inaccurate appraisal of a company’s prospects reached its zenith as reporters chose to write stories about Jonas’s imaginings rather than base stories upon the far less sensational words of Tesla’s CEO, who had just indicated to employees that Q2 looked promising. The week concluded with the Associated Press sending out a story which quoted Senior Analyst Jessica Caldwell of Edmunds as saying, “There doesn’t appear to be anything in the (product) pipeline that is going to save them.” Each retelling of the story gets worse as the ethics of click reporting continue to erode the few remaining hints of journalistic integrity still out there.
To Adam Jonas, I pose this question: Knowing what you learned from the Musk email to employees the day after your investor’s call, are you going to publicly share a significantly revised view of Tesla within a week?
A lack of action would suggest only the worst of motivations for producing such an inaccurate assessment of Tesla. Mr. Jonas, do the right thing.
About the Author
Peter Forman (aka Papafox) Peter is a writer and innovator who began buying Tesla’s stock at $28 a share and has never looked back. This former airline pilot and college professor has a passion for applying new technologies to education. More recently, he has focused on understanding the trajectory of today’s clean energy revolution. He drives a Tesla and powers 100% of his house and vehicle’s energy needs through rooftop solar panels.
Back to Top ↑
Advertisement
Advertise with CleanTechnica to get your company in front of millions of monthly readers.
CleanTechnica Clothing & Cups
Top News On CleanTechnica
Join CleanTechnica Today!
Advertisement
Advertisement
Follow CleanTechnica Follow @cleantechnica
Our Electric Car Driver Report
Read & share our new report on “electric car drivers, what they desire, and what the demand.”
The EV Safety Advantage
Read & share our free report on EV safety, “The EV Safety Advantage.”
EV Charging Guidelines for Cities
Share our free report on EV charging guidelines for cities, “Electric Vehicle Charging Infrastructure: Guidelines For Cities.”
30 Electric Car Benefits
Our Electric Vehicle Reviews
Tesla News
Cleantech Press Releases
“That Was Quick” Category: Carbon Engineering Partners With Occidental To Pump More Oil
Texas Cooperatives Agree to Purchase 7 MW of Distribution-Scale Solar Energy
Tesla Raising ~$2 Billion
38 Anti-Cleantech Myths
Wind & Solar Prices Beat Fossils
Cost of Solar Panels Collapses
© 2018 Sustainable Enterprises Media, Inc.
Invest
Electric Cars
Electric Car Benefits
Electric Car Sales
Solar Energy Rocks
RSS
Advertise
Privacy Policy
This site uses cookies: Find out more.Okay, thanks